Jump to content

User talk:SunDawn/Archives/2022/April

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Edit War UMNO

Hi Sir, I could Really need a Tiny help here. There's a Edit war on UMNO Page and can you block both Account please and Semi-Protected Page. One person who keep Using the slander sources about Contraversial things like ICERD Rally which This person think it's a Racist thing. Another one is trying to stop This user for slandering. Many Users like User Amin Noor Muhammad Remove her Edits because it's a Fake Sources she brought with. I don't want to involve with them althrough i have a bit edit remove just like others did. Currently im not that active much so can you solve it out please ?, Thank You.LTSV 48 (talk) 16:35, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Greetings LTSV 48! Hopefully you are in good health! I will take a look at the article and I will see what I can do. I am not an admin so I can't block people's account, but I will see what I can do. Have a good day! SunDawntalk 04:20, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Hey Sun Dawn, im the one who edited the page of oldest football clubs. The reason behind it is that the current Sevilla Football Club from 1890 was a different club founded by british residents in that city and it has nothing to the current Sevilla's team. Hence the oldest football club in Spain is actually Recreativo de Huelva. I will justify the changes once i edit it, thanks for warning me! 212.230.161.191 (talk) 15:16, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 March 2022

  • Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:53, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi SunDawn. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

  • Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
  • If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed, Rosguill talk 15:46, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! I will do my best! SunDawntalk 02:25, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Barrie (band)

I've added to the talk page of Barrie that was deleted including a plethora of links to other music websites which are notable and are on wikipedia. Therefore they are notable enough to be included.

Frankly I would have preferred if you asked me before deleting the article.

@Metrotitan: The article as I have seen before the tagging does not include any sources that demonstrate their notability. If you have sources that demonstrate their notability, please include them in the article, instead of the talk page. Because there is no demonstration of notability, the article is liable to be removed quickly through a speedy deletion procedure. If there are ways I could help, please ask. Thank you! SunDawntalk 09:03, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
@SunDawn: Ok so if I add all these links can the article go back up.

Administrators' newsletter – April 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Access to Special:RevisionDelete has been expanded to include users who have the deletelogentry and deletedhistory rights. This means that those in the Researcher user group and Checkusers who are not administrators can now access Special:RevisionDelete. The users able to view the special page after this change are the 3 users in the Researcher group, as there are currently no checkusers who are not already administrators. (T301928)
  • When viewing deleted revisions or diffs on Special:Undelete a back link to the undelete page for the associated page is now present. (T284114)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:14, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

your username kinda reminds me of the Warriors series

i mean, i'm not lying, it kinda does Mochi (talk) 15:25, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello! I do not know about the Warriors series, lol. I think my initial intention is to have "SunDown" but somehow it is "SunDawn". SunDawntalk 15:57, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

User Fracabicon

Hi Sir, it's me again. This guy Fracabicon really didn't want to give up as he keep repeat his fake article on UMNO and PAS which he's made an edit war. I already revent back for now but he will keep coming back for his "Reliable Sources" to post some propaganda from Mkini which a lot of people misunderstood in some way. I know You said you not a admin but please do something to stop this guy posting it.LTSV 48 (talk) 07:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello LTSV 48 for the time being I restored his content as it seems that there is no ground for removal of the content. UMNO did participate in Anti ICERD rally. I haven't read much about the Sheraton Move. What is your reasoning that the Anti ICERD rally participation should be removed? I think Malaysiakini is credible enough. SunDawntalk 09:39, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
MalaysiaKini sometime their Journalist they always misunderstood and bias toward the party (UMNO & PAS). Anti-Icerd Rally as i read their Article was actually based on lies. It wasn't controversial actually but User Fracabicon THINKS it's a Controversial issue. Few Wiki Editors like Amin Noor Muhammad and few more also trying to stop Fracabicon from editing the bias he thought.
And sheraton Move controversial is Also Not UMNO And PAS involve. It's just Unexpected from Bersatu and Ex PKR's Chaos movement.
Not all MKini's Article are Credible. Most of them are bias when it comes to UMNO, BN & PAS.
Sorry man.LTSV 48 (talk) 12:17, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
again Im sorry if you think im not right or not. If you notice Fracbicon Never edit Controversial party on Pakatan Harapan and Democratic Action Party. Still she keeps spining asking where's the evidence and i have no time for the evidence because there's too many.LTSV 48 (talk) 12:23, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Concerning 2018 anti-ICERD rally it is pretty obvious that UMNO takes part on it, other sources such as CNA have stated that UMNO joined the rally. The question that remained is whether the anti ICERD rally is a controversy or not. From my personal viewpoint, it is better to be merged into "Belief" instead of "Controversy".
Concerning the edit pattern of Fracabicon that never edited about other parties, that is his/her concern. Bias is expected from all editors, but what is important is adhering to Wikipedia rules. SunDawntalk 13:17, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Yes Umno takes part of the rally but there's no such thing as Controversial to against Icerd. CNA also Mistook about Anti-Icerd Rally as well.
About Fracabicon, he/she wasn't only wrote about controversy but Ideology as well by writing Umno as a Facist, which is Fake cause there's no such thing UMNO can be Facist.
I tried my best to stay away but he/she keeps coming over and over until me or some editors give up.LTSV 48 (talk) 13:34, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 April 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:44, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Stop it

People need to know they shouldn't be too friendly to people they don't want to be friends with you pig — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.11.32.128 (talk) 00:39, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I have only gotten one revert today, and that was 2 hours ago. Good job! interstatefive  (talk) - just another roadgeek 00:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for the barnstar! I really appreciate it! SunDawntalk 00:33, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Original research

Original research my butt you jackass.

No worries 103.255.156.37! Hopefully you have a great day! SunDawntalk 10:52, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Neutrality Stand Ground

Hi :@SunDawn:, I came here to thank you for your fair judgement on the matters previously. Also would you mind sharing some information on how can i be more neutral within this wikipedia page because I always wanted to write fairly. If i do have any mistake made in the future i hope that you can address it to me too.Thank You.Francabicon (talk) 09:53, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

No worries. I will gladly help you anyway I can. The point about neutrality is just to write the facts, and not adding some opinion, you can read more on that on WP:NPOV. If you have any questions please do ask. Is there any article you would like for me to check on? Happy editing! SunDawntalk 10:51, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

German Shepherd

Hello SunDawn

The official GSD day is celebrated by fans all over the world on May 10 every year. It is a fact and hence I added it here. I found it on social media as well as in google search. I'm a new member here and I apologize if I'm wrong.
Regards
The GSD day The GSD day (talk) 11:18, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello The GSD day (talk · contribs)! I think the article in discussion is German Shepherd. The problem I see is that you have no source on the material. Do you have any source? The source I found is this and I don't think it is reliable enough to be used on the article.SunDawntalk 12:44, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Disagreement on RfA

Hi! I tend to sound very passive agressive so I just wanted to say that I don't have animosity towards you or anything. I'm enjoying the conversation there and understand where you're coming from, even if we disagree :) — Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Join WP:FINANCE! 10:32, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

No no! I don't feel any animosity from you at all! And I don't feel that you are acting passive-aggressively at all. I enjoy the conversation as well, though we have different opinion on the RFA. I still feel that both the Support and Oppose (including my vote!) are tainted by politics, and it should not have been that way. SunDawntalk 10:44, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
I agree with your sentiment there. — Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Join WP:FINANCE! 10:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SunDawn/Archives/2022/April&oldid=1085835552"