User talk:Sukusala

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Anantarika-karma, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 22:46, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hi Sukusala! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Greyjoy^talk 11:44, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Four Noble Truths, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 21:08, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please can I ask you about this? Can I do it through this box? Sukusala (talk) 23:31, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DS-alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 21:10, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... I would like to ask about Joshua Jonathon's comments, please. Can I do it here? Sukusala (talk) 23:09, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It appears you may be involved in a dispute over content and Joshua Jonathan is a counterparty to this dispute.

The best place to discuss the actual content issues is on the talk page of the article. I see that there is already a discussion happening at Talk:Four Noble Truths.

If you think the back-and-forth reverts or the placement of warning templates on your talk page are a sign of behavior in violation of WP's rules, you could consider taking those matters to a noticeboard, such as WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring or WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, but so far, I think discussion on the article talk page should develop more before taking things to a noticeboard.

The DS-Alert message is just an alert. It is not an indication you are thought to have done anything wrong, as it makes clear in its text. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:28, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Anantarika-karma, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. JimRenge (talk) 23:39, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit used texts from within a religion or faith system without referring to WP:secondary sources that critically analyze them. JimRenge (talk) 23:50, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Child sex abuse. —Wasell^(T) 🌻🇺🇦 19:29, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I am new to Wiki, so I would appreciate your comments: I wrote three sections. Please let me know which of them is original? 1) Child abuse causes spiritual harm. 2) It has economic consequences. 3) Government departments are facilitating it. Of that information, which is personal analysis? It seemed all well referenced. Many thanks. Sukusala (talk) 20:24, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spiritual Death

Hi, I have reverted your edit at Spiritual Death per WP:BURDEN, WP:UNDUE, and WP:OR. Please consider visiting the WP:TEAHOUSE if you have any questions about editing wikipedia. JimRenge (talk) 00:11, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Spiritual death, you may be blocked from editing. JimRenge (talk) 00:21, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Your edit to Ecstasy of Saint Teresa has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 12:27, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External links

Hi Sukusala!

I noticed that in a few articles, such as Our Lady of Guadalupe, you've added an external link to the body of the article. According to WP:EXTERNAL, Wikipedia's guideline on external links, these should never appear in the body of the article, but only in the "External Links" section and only if they add something beyond what's in the article. Unfortunately, this link doesn't appear to be by experts, and it doesn't contain anything beyond what's written in the article, so in this case, I don't think it would be a good candidate for the External Links section either, so I've removed the link completely.

I would suggest familiarizing yourself with more of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines by checking out the links in the first section on this page. Smdjcl (talk) 23:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]