User talk:Sugarrayeverymorning

Welcome!

Hello, Sugarrayeverymorning, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:31, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello, I'm Qflib. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Montana Jordan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Qflib (talk) 21:02, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I just did not add that.

Hi, I did have a look at the wikipedia page that you linked to for the Young Artist awards, but I don't see Jordan's name listed on it. Is there some other source that we could link to in order to establish that he was a nominee? Sorry if I'm just not seeing it there. Cheers, Qflib (talk) 17:43, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind - I found the citation. Looks like the organization sponsoring the awards changed their website domain name. I added the citation. Cheers! Qflib (talk) 02:22, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at A Return to Salem's Lot, you may be blocked from editing. DonIago (talk) 02:56, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 22:44, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stealing Sinatra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eric Johnson. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 08:29, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Role Models, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 02:08, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Luke Wilson. You've received multiple warnings about inserting unsourced content, but you continue to do so. I strongly recommend that you review WP:BURDEN as well. DonIago (talk) 01:49, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Acekard. Thank you. Mike Allen 19:20, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:2019AlwaysLit per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Acekard. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 11:33, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Competition film.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Competition film.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Underdeveloped tv show.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Underdeveloped tv show.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:57, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]