User talk:SueJenkins

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...advice on how long from submitting my Sandbox entry (my first ever Wikipedia entry) to getting it published. I appreciate that it's an open question as it will depend on the quality of my contribution, but just wanted a sense of whether days for someone to review, or weeks, or more? Thanks and apologies for disturbing. I've found everything very straightforward so far and have an entry that's nearly ready to submit. Sue

SueJ 21:52, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

There currently are about 350 drafts awaiting review, so it may take a week or two - maybe even longer. On the other hand, drafts are not necessarily reviewed in chroological order, so it may be much faster than that. I'm sorry I cannot give you a more precise estimate, but the reviewers are volunteers too. That said, parts of the draft seem to be copy-pasted from elsewhere. That's a copyright violation. You should fix that s soon as possible or the draft may be deleted. Please summarize in your own words what reliable third-party sources report about the subject. Huon (talk) 22:22, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Huon kindly explained how the submission process works. I submitted my first ever draft two weeks ago, and just wondered how long it will be before it gets looked at. I did take Huon's advice and revise my draft to ensure everything was in my own words to avoid copyright violation. Thanks for any further advice on timescale, and hope I'm not being a nuisance.

SueJ 11:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

You submitted the page 9 days ago, and the backlog is currently 28 days. Thus, your page could be reviewed any time in the next two weeks. Please be patient. Primefac (talk) 14:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Robert Beck self portrait.jpg

Hello, SueJenkins. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Robert Beck self portrait.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:42, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Beck (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Daniel kenneth was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

videography and art market are still unreferenced

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert Beck and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Daniel kenneth (talk) 13:34, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! SueJenkins, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Daniel kenneth (talk) 13:34, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:BlizzardManhattan.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BlizzardManhattan.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:BlizzardManhattan.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BlizzardManhattan.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:02, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, SueJenkins. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

Hello SueJenkins. You used the {{Help me}} tag but did not ask a question. Please write out your question and replace the {{Help me}} tag when you are done, and someone will be along to help. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance. Click here for instant access to the channel.

Please help me with...I just wanted to say that I am finishing for tonight but will start again in the morning working on adding citations and getting the date format right. Please be patient with me - I hope to have a huge improvement within 24 hours! Thank you. Sue

SueJ (talk) 02:42, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Bob Krist has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bob Krist. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 06:34, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bob Krist (September 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Domdeparis was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

this article does not explain why this person is notable and there is no in-depth independent coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bob Krist and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Domdeparis (talk) 12:16, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, SueJenkins. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Robert Beck (painter), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 15:19, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Thank you for the advice and education, Huon. I am removing the references to the Honored Artist Award, as well as to the Philadelphia Sketch Club one, until/unless I can find a less parochial source of information on the subject. I would then like to remove the template that indicates there's a problem with the page, but I am afraid I am struggling there, and would be grateful for your guidance again. Best wishes, Sue SueJ (talk) 12:33, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me with... Thank you for pointing out a possible conflict of interest. I do know Robert Beck as I live in the same town as his gallery. I wanted to add an item under the 'Awards' section: Phillips' Mill 88th Juried Art Exhibition, Honored Artist 2017. The Phillips' Mill Community website has a reference to this, which I added as citation: [24].

I was also planning to add a reference to the Award that featured in the Bucks County Herald October 5th 2017 edition (link to article at: http://edition.pagesuite-professional.co.uk/html5/reader/production/default.aspx?pubid=8cfa36d5-b00d-43c3-8fac-398cf2b87549&edid=afba6d09-282d-45f3-a89a-0b90ddab2521&pnum=6)

There is an additional item about Beck that it would seem useful to include. Robert Beck painted a portrait of Dr Robert Schoenberg on the occasion of the renaming of the LGBT Center to the Schoenberg Carriage House at the University of Pennsylvania, where the portrait will hang. Citation at: http://sketchclub.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Portfolio-November-2017.pdf [the reference is on P.17 of this document]. Robert Beck presented his portrait of Dr. Robert Schoenberg at the University of Pennsylvania on October 14 2017.

I apologise for not following the Wikipedia rules and will in future use only the Talk page to make a suggestion. I am also looking for an article in the Bucks County Herald which supports this Award information, and will add it to the Talk page when I find it, if that is acceptable.

Apologies again.

Sue

SueJ (talk) 15:30, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia content should be based on what reliable sources that are independent of the subject have reported about it. The Phillips' Mill Community website is not an independent source about the Phillips' Mill's activities. Similarly, the Philadelphia Sketch Club's newsletter is not an independent source about the members of the Sketch Club. That leaves us with the Bucks County Herald, which is a reliable secondary source. It's also very local news. Even worse, it also doesn't actually say Beck won an award at that art show, which in fact he didn't. In general, I don't think adding such local honours improves an article. Yes, the local newspaper may report on who won the cheesecake competition at Auntie Jen's Bake Sale, but that doesn't mean Auntie Jen's Cheesecake Award is a significant honour that our readers need to know about to have an appropriate understanding of the subject. Huon (talk) 01:04, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

COI Template

Following Huon's guidance I have removed the parochial items from the Robert Beck entry, along with their supporting citations. I have also read, several times, the information about removing the template from the page, but still cannot see how to do this. Please may I ask for your help one more time? Thanks so much. Sue

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, SueJenkins. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Bob Krist concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bob Krist, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bob Krist

Hello, SueJenkins. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bob Krist".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 08:33, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, SueJenkins. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]