User talk:SuddenDeth

Welcome!

Hello, SuddenDeth, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 03:49, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Midnight In The Labyrinth

Hey man - this is the discussion I was talking about. It's mostly about Bitter Suites but Midnight becomes part of it. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cradle_of_Filth#.22Studio_albums.22_discussion If you don't want to read that for some reason, the basic gist is simply that the list on that main Cradle page is just the core studio albums, of which Midnight isn't one. It's a side release; just a curio. All the official wording around Manticore was that it was the tenth studio album. So we list the core ten in that basic list, and it gets more detailed and exhaustive on the actual discography page. Hope that makes sense. Cardinal Wurzel (talk) 08:33, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever I don't really care. I know it's a studio album and well wikipedia isn't really reliable anyway.

It's a collection of re-recorded old songs. That's not quite the same thing. Cardinal Wurzel (talk) 13:34, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is. It's a studio album IT WAS RECORDED IN A STUDIO SPECIFICALLY FOR THIS RELEASE. It is not a Compilation of previously released material (they are newly recorded unique versions of songs) therefore it is a studio album.

You're missing the point - deliberately I think. You get what I'm saying, right? That there are ten main albums and then there is other stuff? And that other stuff was recorded in a studio, yes. But... Cardinal Wurzel (talk) 14:32, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Butt-nothing. It's a studio album. You are wrong.

April 2015

Your recent editing history at Template:AC/DC shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Also, this is a WP:BLP matter. Tread lightly, or risk being blocked. Drmies (talk) 22:42, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bloodborne.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bloodborne.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. The1337gamer (talk) 22:44, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Slipknot ref

Your cited source is good but the citation needs reformatted. By any chance, do you know what the interview question was that mentioned this part that Venturella played on .5? DannyMusicEditor (talk) 17:14, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you ctrl+f and type in "you played" it'll take you straight to the question which he states Alessandro played on 5 or 6 tracks and below it states that Donnie played bass on a few too along with Jim.

Thanks! That's going to be very useful for me in the future. I didn't know I could do that. Oh, and type 4 tildes (~) after your posts so people are sure to know it's you who's talking. Don't make the SineBot do all the work. DannyMusicEditor (talk) 17:23, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome SuddenDeth (talk) 17:43, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"XIX"

I have reverted your last edit per WP:BRD. "XIX" has charted, and has six references to its name. Please present this at WP:AFD if you would like to delete or redirect the page. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:26, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Volume 8: The Threat Is Real, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Bush. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Untitled tenth Metallica studio album, did not appear constructive and has been or will be undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 22:37, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Untitled tenth Metallica studio album. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 10:26, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Follow the Leader (Korn album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Marin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Hardwired...to Self-Destruct.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you disagree with the reasoning that I have provided for you in regards to "Lords of Summer", you should really be discussing on the talk page. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 23:34, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That "please provide a source" edit summary was also supposed to apply to you. I understand that "Lords of Summer" was released as a single on vinyl, I can see that clearly – but that was later in 2014, not now; it wasn't released as a single from the album. It was released as a demo and had no connection to the album, as stated in my previous edit summary. This time around, two years later, it was included in the deluxe version of the album, but that does not make it the first single from the album, because – as stated before – it is not on the album proper. "Hardwired" is the first single from the album, and the point that I'm trying to make is that you need to find a source stating that it was the second, not the first. Again, the "Lords of Summer" demo, and the single later released on vinyl, had no connection to the album. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 03:40, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Lords of Summer

added links pointing to Heavy metal and Black Friday

Hardwired...to Self-Destruct

added a link pointing to Black Friday

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hardwired...to Self-Destruct. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 23:55, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Bleeding, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Barnes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Metallica.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 22:35, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hardwired... to Self-Destruct. Discuss on the Metallica talk page, please. How can Lulu be considered a standalone Metallica studio album if Hardwired is considered their tenth? 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 00:48, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hardwired Deluxe Vinyl.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hardwired Deluxe Vinyl.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The1337gamer (talk) 16:45, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hardwired Vinyl.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hardwired Vinyl.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The1337gamer (talk) 16:45, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hardwires Deluxe.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hardwires Deluxe.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The1337gamer (talk) 16:45, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, SuddenDeth. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hardwired credits

Your two most recent edits are contradictory. First you deleted the lyrics credits saying they weren't in the liner notes, but then you added Trujillo on backing vocals, which is not written in the booklet either (I'm reading the vinyl issue).--Retrohead (talk) 11:53, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nine Inch Nails. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Laser brain (talk) 17:55, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you make any more disputed edits to NIN without gaining consensus first, I will have no choice but to report you to the Edit Warring noticeboard, where your may receive a block to prevent further disruption. --Laser brain (talk) 06:02, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Laser brain (talk) 22:39, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The report is here. You should consider responding to this complaint. Otherwise, a block for edit warring is possible. EdJohnston (talk) 22:57, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Nine Inch Nails

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:34, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ride the Lightning. - Mlpearc (open channel) 18:36, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you're not going to start another edit war over this shit, SuddenDeth—especially not on a Featured Article. Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 23:06, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The digital edition bonus tracks section already had a source attached to it therefore no extra source was needed. Also I am reporting you for your unprofessionalism in dealing with this and use of profanity towards another user. SuddenDeth (talk) 23:33, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring, again !

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ride the Lightning. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - Mlpearc (open channel) 23:17, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have already had another administrator agree with my consensus Mlpearc so you are the one edit warring and can't accept you're wrong. You still have not explained why Jason cannot be listed. He appears on those 2 tracks and the credit I added clearly states he plays on those tracks only. What good comes from not listing Jason as that means that the credits are incomplete. SuddenDeth (talk) 23:29, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

One editor (regardless of status) is not consensus, period. - Mlpearc (open channel) 23:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still waiting for your reasons for believing Jason should not be listed in the credits despite PLAYING ON THOSE 2 TRACKS. Do you not understand what a credit is? If a performer performs on a track he is entitled to a credit. If Jason's credit is ignored then it gives the impression that Cliff Burton the only listed bass guitarist after your edit would have performed on those tracks thus provides incorrect information which destroys the whole point of having an article about the album. Seriously how did you get to become an admin? You want to delete FACTS. I am considering reporting you on the incident board. SuddenDeth (talk) 23:43, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it's already been stated by Curly Turkey. Any further responses by me on this issue will be made on the article's talk page, once you start the discussion. - Mlpearc (open channel) 23:53, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Curly Turkey calls giving credit where credit is due absurd.... SuddenDeth (talk) 23:59, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus—SuddenDeth has already had his warning. Why hasn't he been blocked already? Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 00:26, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A warning that was unjustified SuddenDeth (talk) 00:51, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] - Mlpearc (open channel) 00:52, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ride the Lightning. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Flat Out (talk) 02:58, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:SuddenDeth reported by User:Flat Out (Result: ). Thank you. Flat Out (talk) 03:13, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kill 'Em All. - Mlpearc (open channel) 16:32, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Master of Puppets. - Mlpearc (open channel) 16:34, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Born Again (Black Sabbath album). - Mlpearc (open channel) 16:36, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Haha yeah you've already tried and failed xD SuddenDeth (talk) 16:37, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. - Mlpearc (open channel) 16:41, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Hello, I'm JudgeRM. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Not the Actual Events, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Please note that the verifiability policy mandates that unsourced material that has been challenged, such as by a "fact" tag, or by its removal, may not be added back without a reliable, published source being cited for the content, using an inline citation. The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article, and the burden is on the person wishing to keep in the disputed material. So if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so, following these requirements! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please be aware that your personal experience is not a reliable source. Thank you. JudgeRM (talk to me) 21:14, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It says "to be shipped January 2017" it's now February and no one has received it. SuddenDeth (talk) 21:42, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:49, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of treating the WP:ANI thread as a wake up call, you instead continue to edit war on other articles, ignoring what other editors are telling you about Wikipedia's guidelines. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:53, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm VQuakr. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Prince (musician), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 05:04, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Prince (musician). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. VQuakr (talk) 17:35, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SuddenDeth, it appears that your last two blocks have had zero effect on your editing behavior as you've returned to edit warring at Prince (musician). Your next trip to WP:ANEW is likely to result in a lengthy block, so I suggest a careful reading and following of WP:BRD. If someone reverts you, discuss it instead of strapping on your gloves for a fight, even if you think you are right. Pinging NeilN, the last blocking admin. --Laser brain (talk) 18:10, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dirk Verbeuren

Hi, I know Verbeuren didn't record any songs with Megadeth yet and Adler drummed in the songs for Dystopia. The thing is: Megadeth got awarded with the Grammy when he was already a member, so literally seen this counts for Verbeuren too. For example, if Metallica would win an award for Kill 'Em All, Hammett gets all the honour (together with the other Metallica members) while Mustaine wrote almost all songs for that album. I just think it's a fact that when a band wins a Grammy, the prize is for all band members at the moment the Grammy's take place. Also, I wrote "With Megadeth, he won the Grammy for 'Best Metal Performance'", so I mean that he/they won that prize when he was a member and at the time they won it, he was a member. If he doesn't deserve the Grammy as well, then why was he invited to the Grammy's...? I know why: Because he's a member of Megadeth and they won the prize as a band. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.165.77.61 (talk) 19:07, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

81.165.77.61 actually for Hardwired only James Hetfield and Lars Ulrich were nominated because it was for best song not best performance. For best performance the whole band gets credit however Dirk was not part of the performance therefore he did not win a prize. By your logic then David Bowie doesn't get credit for his Grammy because he's no longer part of his band and didn't attend the ceremony which is ludicrous logic. He attended the ceremony because Mustaine decided not to bring Chris Adler instead. That doesn't mean Dirk is the recipient of the award it just means the current band attended the ceremony. Also please see this link from the official Grammy website listing Chris Adler as the nominee for Megadeth https://www.grammy.com/node/218641 SuddenDeth (talk) 19:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on AC/DC. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Laser brain (talk) 23:35, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion 2

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Laser brain (talk) 03:19, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider responding to the complaint. In a February discussion at ANI I proposed that the next step should be an indefinite block of your account. You haven't used an article talk page for six months, and it seems unlikely you have any plan to change. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:41, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for long-term edit warring

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for long-term edit warring on a variety of articles; no interest in seeking consensus. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:56, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lords of summer cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lords of summer cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:25, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Raising hell.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Raising hell.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:40, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]