User talk:Suburbanabstrakt

Suburbanabstrakt, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Suburbanabstrakt! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like MrClog (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dennis H. Osborne has been accepted

Dennis H. Osborne, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:46, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Galway MacCann has been accepted

George Galway MacCann, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spicy (talk) 21:23, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Romeo Toogood has been accepted

Romeo Toogood, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:25, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Saidie Patterson

Thanks for your editing on Saidie Patterson though now the sources are no longer referenced at the end of the sentence or paragraph they went with, making it look like there are no sources for the content. ☕ Antiqueight ^chatter 16:12, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message. Unfortunately the responsibility for that lies elsewhere. The references were all at the end when I arrived on the page. I thought it was rather rubbish too. Regards Suburbanabstrakt (talk) 21:13, 3 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crawford Mitchell has been accepted

Crawford Mitchell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:49, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Suburbanabstrakt

Thank you for creating Bob Sloan.

User:MarioGom, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good job! The lead section could be expanded a bit, sett Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MarioGom}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

MarioGom (talk) 00:04, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{Re|MarioGom}} Cheers, I'll have a lok at that over the weekend. Regards Suburbanabstrakt (talk) 19:26, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hi Suburbanabstrakt! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 23:08, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Colin Middleton page findmypast problems

Hi Suburbanabstrakt , something weird seems to be going on with the Colin Middleton page. You will recall that you did a lot of edits to this page from 15-30 August 2021, and from 27 March- 4 April 2022, including adding many citations. It is the links in these citations that have gone haywire. So if you click on, say, "A Drama League success". Northern Whig. 19 March 1937 what you get is a message aying 'Whoops! Something went wrong on our end'.

These messages come from the site findmypast, and you have 19 references to findmypast on the page, of which most, if not all, don't work. It looks like this site is unreliable (to put it mildly). I don't know when it went wrong: I was editing the page in August and didn't notice anything wrong then, so it might have happened after that. Can the position be salvaged?

By the way, what are the references to 'Northern Whig' about? I thought this was a bar in Belfast . . . Brymor (talk) 20:09, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]