User talk:Subs99

Welcome!

Hello, Subs99, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 19:03, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: National Security Analysis Center (June 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a dictionary. We cannot accept articles that are little more than definitions of words or abbreviations as entries. A good article should begin with a good definition, but expand on the subject. Please try creating an article at Wiktionary instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:National Security Analysis Center and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 16:27, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:National Security Analysis Center concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:National Security Analysis Center, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:National Security Analysis Center

Hello, Subs99. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "National Security Analysis Center".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Cahk (talk) 08:17, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:National Security Analysis Center

Hello, Subs99. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "National Security Analysis Center".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 08:56, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: A Fork in the Road (2009 film) (July 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was:

The proposed article is not suitable for Wikipedia. Because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, articles on fictional subjects should cover their real-world context and contain sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's development, impact or historical significance—not just a summary of the plot. You may wish to add this content to an existing article. As anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are free to do so yourself.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:A Fork in the Road (2009 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 17:52, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:39, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Subs99, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 17:52, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: A Fork in the Road (2009 film) (July 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joe Decker was:

I'll leave a note on your talk page.

I know you would like there to be an article on this.

The right place to ask for someone to write such an article isn't here.

You want to add it to the list at Wikipedia:Requested_articles/Arts_and_entertainment/Film,_radio_and_television, instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:A Fork in the Road (2009 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

joe decker ^talk 04:03, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's an automatic message, this is me talking in plain English.

The right place to ask for someone to write an article on a topic isn't AfC.

Instead, you want to add it to the list at Wikipedia:Requested_articles/Arts_and_entertainment/Film,_radio_and_television

Because *all* work at Wikipedia is done by volunteers, whether or not that gets done is nothing I can promise. But that's your best shot, short of writing an article on it yourself. --joe decker ^talk 04:06, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Goulston

Hello Subs99. I noticed that you recently made this edit at Mark Goulston. I wonder could I ask you to keep an eye out for any secondary source(s) confirming his death, that could be used in place of the family's Twitter message? I'll also keep looking. Many thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:43, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]