User talk:Stylus123

July 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hibiscus has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Hibiscus was changed by Stylus123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.915319 on 2019-07-01T06:11:36+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:11, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Stylus123 (talk) 07:12, 17 July 2019 (UTC) As part of the wikipedia Notablity, Do we need to provide a source which have a clear mention about the topic we are talking about or just a reference would be enough? for example can we give the links which are linked back to our topic (backlinks)

For notability purposes, you need multiple sources (not just one), which are reliably published (so no blogs or personal websites), which are independent of the company (so no company websites or press releases), and which devote significant coverage to the topic (usually taken to mean multiple paragraphs).

You should also be aware that Wikipedia strongly discourages edits about a topic with which you are personally involved, due to the conflict of interest this creates. If you have any financial relationship with the subject of an article, you must disclose this in line with Wikipedia's Terms of Use; failure to do so will result in you being blocked from editing. Yunshui ^雲_水 08:37, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Insight Consultants moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Insight Consultants, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 06:35, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Stylus123! You created a thread called Notability Source clarification at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Insight Consultants (July 30)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:52, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Stylus123! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 14:52, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Stylus123! You created a thread called Re-submission of article at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Stylus123! You created a thread called Article rejection query at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Insight logo with tagline-01.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Insight logo with tagline-01.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Insight Consultants concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Insight Consultants, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Insight Consultants

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Insight Consultants has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. kingboyk (talk) 21:30, 7 February 2020 (UTC)