User talk:Style777

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Maryam Heydarzadeh. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ArcAngel (talk) 04:29, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Kelly2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kelly2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:29, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Kelly Killoren appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Someguy1221 (talk) 06:49, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Kelly killoren.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kelly killoren.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

It's come to my attention that the text you've added to Kelly Killoren has been copied off of this website. Further, it appears that the images you've uploaded of Kelly Killoren are professional photographs. Please note that copying the work of others onto Wikipedia is a copyright violation, and is not allowed here. If you happen to be the rightful owner of the copyright on the web material, you should post a notice of release of copyright on the website. If you are the rightful owner to the copyrights on the photographs, you may email the release of copyright to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Thank you. Someguy1221 (talk) 08:09, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Kellykillorenpicture.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kellykillorenpicture.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:50, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism to Kelly Bensimon page - May 2009 Warnings (multiple)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Arrests and lawsuits are part of factual public record and are not "gossip." Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Template:uw-delete2 --> ~ <font color="#228b22 PR (talk) 18:16, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Kelly Killoren. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:49, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Kelly Killoren has been reverted, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Someguy1221 (talk) 06:57, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Kelly Killoren Bensimon, you will be blocked from editing. You are one of the many editors who repeatedly remove a referenced section regarding Bensimon's arrest for assault; as the self-described publicist for Ms. Bensimon, you have a clear Conflict of Interest (COI) WP:CONFLICT; you are also attempting to present information in this article in a non-neutral manner. Wikipedia is not a public relations vehicle for Ms. Bensimon. Wikipedia takes COI (conflict of interest) and repeat vandalism violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. PR (talk) 14:09, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Conflict of Interest

Hi, you have been reported to the Conflict of interest noticeboard here Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#COI_on_Kelly_Bensimon due to your editing of Kelly Killoren Bensimon. You are welcome to make any comments with regard to this possible conflict of interest at the noticeboard. Please read the conflict of interest guidelines posted below. Thank You Smartse (talk) 15:03, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Smartse (talk) 15:03, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation

The recent edit you made to User talk:Style777/Sandbox has been reverted, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Someguy1221 (talk) 17:56, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

COI & removal of sourced material

Hi, if you continue to remove sourced material it is considered vandalism and your account can be blocked. Also, since you claim to be the publicist for the subject of an article you have edited, that constitutes a conflict of interest. Please read the policies I have linked to because you have a long history of warnings and can be banned from editing if it continues. Thank you. Drawn Some (talk) 21:15, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Style777. You removed others' comments from the article's talk page here. If you remove comments again, or if you violate our policies with your edits of the article itself, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. There is still time for you to respond to the complaint about your edits at WP:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 22:15, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page move without consensus

Hi, you moved the page Kelly Killoren Bensimon without discussion. That is the name the press uses as well as her legal name. Please do not move popular pages without achieving consensus on the talk page. Consider this a formal warning, you can be blocked if you do it again. see WP:VANDAL. Thanks. Drawn Some (talk) 19:32, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

e-mail and reply

Ron, We have been having several problems editing Ms.Killoren's account. We are her oficial webdesigner and technicians. We have been hired as that, and not "PUBLICIST", as reffered to in your other messages from you and your colleuges. Personal arrests are public records, but not to be edited in someones biography and career. This is "Character Assasination" and not proper authorized conduct. We would like to solve this properly, but in worse case, if we have to involve our Legal team, we will. Wikipedia is not TMZ or some cheap online gossip website. People view Wikipedia to receive information on the persons career and biographt...not arrest reports and unconfirmed lawsuits, when indeed her Jewelry is selling on the market as I write you this. If indeed a lawsuite was going on, an immediate stop to all her jewelry line be recommended by court. We can prove that this is a false report. If this is not deleted, we will persue this by law. You should not be embarrasing well known A-Listers with lies and unconfirmed gossip....and should not report this in ther Wikipedia page. There are any celebrities that we know, that have had arrests, but you have not submitted this to their Wikipedia page. I do hope we can settle this soon. This is not a conflict of personal interest. Never in our 11 years of internet marketing and webdesign, have we come upon such untrue insiting words, as in this case.

Ms.Killoren's does NOT have an account. WP makes some space available for an article page that is WP:NPOV and WP:NOTCENSORED. WP is a collection of FACTS, often in a prose fashion. Nothing in WP belongs to any person.

If you can prove that the report in the NY Post is false then why not do so?

There are plenty of other celebrities with arrest data that is on their page. The data is usually only removed if the court case fails or is withdrawn.

Picture Copyrights :

All pictures are legally copyrights of Kelly Killoren. She is the legal owner of all pictures we submitted. We informed you on this, but again we were told we didn't.

WP has specific ways in which to release the copyright for pictures, when that is done the pictures can be used, see Wikipedia:Donating_copyrighted_materials.

Content Copyright :

You mentioned in our messages that we used uncopryrighted content from www.kellykillorenbensimon.com website. We are permitted by Ms. Killoren to use all proper text for any contents of her Wikipedia page. This again is a false accusation and statement from your behalf.

I refer you to the answer I gave earlier - it's not her page. She has no ownership rights. You are not permitted to use copyright material unless you release the material according to WP's policies, again see Wikipedia:Donating_copyrighted_materials.

Official Name of Ms. Killoren :

Her Wikipedia page should read Kelly Killoren (Bensimon). Bensimon is no longer her legal name. I do not know how your company would have the informatin to insist that this is her real name. People recognize her with Bensimon, but her Last name now is only KILLOREN.We must put BENSIMON like this (BENSIMON) .

Sadly I have no company. Happily I don't live in your country either.

As for the name, then I suggest a read of Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Requesting_potentially_controversial_moves and apply the templates as suggested. You cannot force a name change, it's best done by consensus - otherwise someone will change it back.

I hope for your cooperation. If not, Ms. Killoren hand this issue over to her lawyers. This page must be updated as soon as possible correctly, this is a fears game with her reputation.

My cooperation is the comments above Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:11, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]