Jump to content

User talk:StubenviechatSanAkBwPresse

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bundeswehr Medical Academy (November 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 08:27, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, SanAkBwPresse! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 08:27, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bundeswehr Medical Academy has been accepted

[edit]
Bundeswehr Medical Academy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 11:19, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, SanAkBwPresse, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Theroadislong (talk) 13:25, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

It also appears that your account is intended to be used for the purpose of telling the world about an organization, person or cause that you consider worthwhile. Unfortunately, many good causes are not sufficiently notable for their own Wikipedia article, and all users are discouraged from editing in any area where they have an inherent conflict of interest. You may wish to consider one of these alternative outlets. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

 Thank you. Orange Mike | Talk 15:57, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Orangemike, FYI Theroadislong. To be honest I am a bit surprised. Like I wrote on my userpage, and clicked when I wrote the article Bundeswehr Medical Academy (German: Sanitätsakademie der Bundeswehr (SanAkBw) "Presse" is obviously close to "press") that this is the account of the academy. In the German version we are already officially verified. So we declared everything openly from the first edit and of course do everything to remain as neutral as possible. What do we have to do to get unlocked, to continue contributing? Thank you for your efforts!--SanAkBwPresse (talk) 18:13, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo, is it ok, when I continue with my privat account? I do not want to do any mistake.--SanAkBwPresse (talk) 18:44, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unlike de.wikipedia, the English-language Wikipedia expressly rejects and forbids any account which represents any sort of collective entity, be it Verein, Bund, Gewerkschaft or Konfession. Only single individual human beings can have accounts, and they cannot be passed on to or shared with any other human being. Individual persons like User:Uschi von SanAkBwPresse or User:Kemal@SanAkBwPresse could have accounts, but User: SanAkBwPresse Bibliothekar could not - the latter would be a "role account", belonging to a role rather than an individual human being. If a single unique human being has been using this account all along, then she or he needs to follow the instructions and request an unblock for the purpose of renaming. If more than one person has been doing so, then this account must be abandoned and each of them must request an account, identify their status as a paid editor with a conflict of interest, and assure us that they will be following our terms and conditions. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:55, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Orangemike for this information. All edits have been done by one person. Would stubenviech@SanAkBwPresse (one word) be ok? Under this name I am active as a private person.--SanAkBwPresse (talk) 19:09, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It would have to be User:Stubenviech@SanAkBwPresse, not broken up in the middle (although 'at' would be better for software reasons than the '@' symbol). If all the edits of this account were done by the person who also is User:Stubenviech, that person would be able to edit IF they follow the instructions above for a formal request for unblocking, fully disclose COI, etc. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:24, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I hearby confirm, that I am the same person. Of course I will keep both accounts strictly seperated. Thank you for your efforts.Stubenviech (talk) 20:14, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I applied to move this page to User:StubenviechatSanAkBwPresse.--SanAkBwPresse (talk) 19:45, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rename second try

[edit]

Hallo, I didn´t receive any feedback on my request. Now I am trying it the other way. Unfortunately I can´t use the foreseen page to request the new name, so I put it here. How do I have to proceed Orangemike Theroadislong? Thank you for your efforts.--SanAkBwPresse (talk) 07:34, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SanAkBwPresse → StubenviechatSanAkBwPresse

[edit]

--SanAkBwPresse (talk) 07:34, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:StubenviechatSanAkBwPresse&oldid=1255429021"