User talk:StrexcorpEmployee

StrexcorpEmployee, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi StrexcorpEmployee! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Memory conformity. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 17:35, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

I refer to your edit here: [1]. Yes, the image is copyrighted, however, it is also acceptable for use under Wikipedia's fair use rationale. Please read Wikipedia:Non-free content, and please cease removing images from Wikipedia until you have good understanding of copyright law. Have a nice day. Damien Linnane (talk) 01:02, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to J. K. Rowling, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please provide an edit summary when you make changes. Esowteric+Talk 20:39, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Hi, my name is Elfabet (talk · contribs) and I cam across your recent contribution at xkcd. I was wondering about the category, as it seem very opinion-based to me, and against Wikipedia's policy of neutrality. Could you explain it a bit? Thanks! Elfabet (talk) 12:39, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deadline (audio drama), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barbara Wright (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:39, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Short Trips: A Universe of Terrors (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Andrew Campbell and John Binns

Short Trips: The Muses (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chorus

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:24, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello, I'm Ttwaring. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Seinfeld, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ttwaring (talk) 15:21, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Black Mirror, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Romance and Horror (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Because

We are encyclopedians, we should not express or personal opinion. Materialscientist (talk) 01:58, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert Shearman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Finish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:21, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at James Goss (producer). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Schazjmd (talk) 17:17, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Chase (Doctor Who), you may be blocked from editing. DonQuixote (talk) 18:42, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tannis root" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tannis root. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 22#Tannis root until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:49, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Airplane!. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:13, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Straight Story, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Realism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:45, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced category addition to Rod Serling

Question for you here: Talk:Rod Serling#Category:Anti-Zionist Jews.

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Doctor Who (season 22), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Short Trips.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Family Guy, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 01:23, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Living meme" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Living meme. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 1#Living meme until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:14, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Love_and_Monsters_(film). Do not insert your opinions into articles.[2] -- 109.76.141.49 (talk) 00:07, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Derek Chauvin. Thank you. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 21:29, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "StrexcorpEmployee", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it implies shared use. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 21:44, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

― Tartan357 ^Talk 21:29, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sock puppet revert

Hi, I restored an article to the prior "sock-puppetry involvement" version. Could you double check your changes[3] and make them again if necessary? Thanks - GizzyCatBella🍁 14:21, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Hitler's breakfast" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Hitler's breakfast. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 8#Hitler's breakfast until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Freelance-frank (talk) 15:07, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at On the Jewish Question. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 05:50, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Dindu Nuffin" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Dindu Nuffin. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 24#Dindu Nuffin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 19:45, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bob the Builder (TV character)

Did you create this redirect after following the links from a certain simulated Reddit post? (Nothing wrong with that, mind you.) ;) Glades12 (talk) 15:20, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"List of people in the United States who have been executed for murder" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect List of people in the United States who have been executed for murder and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 13#List of people in the United States who have been executed for murder until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:01, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Bush Dick Incident" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Bush Dick Incident and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 15#Bush Dick Incident until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:17, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi StrexcorpEmployee. I pinged you from the RfD, but would like to be a bit more direct: While generally it's optional to show up to the XfD for a page one created, in this case this crosses over to a potential user conduct issue, and so as an administrator I'm going to ask you to explain—here or at the RfD—how that redirect isn't vandalism. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 00:55, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only warning: Inappropriate and vandalistic redirects

If you create another redirect based on a SubredditSimulator post [4] [5] [6] [7], where that is not a term that a human would plausibly use (as with Hitler's breakfast and Bush Dick Incident), or again create a vandalistic redirect for any other reason, I will block your account for vandalism. Such edits are contrary to Wikipedia's purpose. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 22:29, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Germans love to eat" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Germans love to eat and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 27#Germans love to eat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:29, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"N (math)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect N (math) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 28#N (math) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 03:57, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Cereal eating by humans" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Cereal eating by humans and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 28#Cereal eating by humans until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:01, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Touching oneself" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Touching oneself and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 28#Touching oneself until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:06, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Vacuous water" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Vacuous water and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 28#Vacuous water until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 15:28, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Hillary Clintom" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Hillary Clintom and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 28#Hillary Clintom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 20:19, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"New-York Courrier" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect New-York Courrier and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 28#New-York Courrier until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 20:33, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Social Darwinist" and BNP userboxes

Hello, StrexcorpEmployee. Having in mind that the RAC MfD is closed now (as expected – with "Delete" as the outcome), I want to ask about your opinion on what should be done with the "Social Darwinist" and the BNP userboxes (which you mentioned in the RAC MfD discussion). I personally think that your raising of that issue was completely justified. Would you think that they warrant their own MFD, or that something else should be done? — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 01:59, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Doidld Tyatsmr

Hello, StrexcorpEmployee

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username ClydeFranklin and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Doidld Tyatsmr, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 26 § Doidld Tyatsmr.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|ClydeFranklin}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} 18:13, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Night and the Doctor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Night and the Doctor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Night and the Doctor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hektor (talk) 08:20, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"United Rapes" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect United Rapes has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 3 § United Rapes until a consensus is reached. LR.127 (talk) 20:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]