StreamGamer, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi StreamGamer! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Bop34 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021

Hello, I'm Clpo13. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Eric Adams, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! clpo13_(talk) 23:09, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jan 22=

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Slatersteven (talk) 14:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for my actions, I will no longer continue to change the articles on the page, but the updated page has some false information that needs to be fixed StreamGamer (talk) 16:09, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please go to the article talk page(Talk:Breonna Taylor protests) and detail the nature of the errors along with any independent reliable sources that you have(if needed). Please understand that Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources state; if those sources are not being summarized accurately or there are sources missing, please tell us. 331dot (talk) 16:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Battle of Kherson. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. This article is specifically for the battle of Kherson which occurred from February to march. This is what the consensus for the article's scope has been reached to. Curbon7 (talk) 20:10, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2022 Kazakh unrest have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Sumanuil. 07:20, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still getting used to this. Sorry StreamGamer (talk) 21:38, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mythical Creatures Movie (TV Series)

Hello, StreamGamer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mythical Creatures Movie (TV Series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mythical Creatures Movie (TV Series)

Hello, StreamGamer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mythical Creatures Movie".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:18, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]