User talk:Strayacj

January 2020

Your recent editing history at Siege of Ansi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Adakiko (talk) 08:44, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#Two well over 3RR on several articles. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:59, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Millennium Stadium

If either of you edit the article(s) again without clear consensus you will be blocked. Please discuss at Talk:Football in the United Kingdom#Millennium Stadium and seek consensus. Giant Snowman 13:54, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Strayacj reported by User:Esiymbro (Result: ). Thank you. Esiymbro (talk) 11:06, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese hat

Hello! I saw you blanked the page Chinese hat. If it was your intention to request this page be deleted, please list the page on redirects for discussion. If you had a different goal, I'd be happy to help find the right thing to do. In the mean time, I have reverted the change. Thanks for the interest in the project. --TeaDrinker (talk) 05:30, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I look into this further, this redirect is definitely problematic. I have gone ahead and listed it myself with a recommendation for deletion. If you would like to contribute to that discussion, feel free here. Thanks again and let me know if you have any questions or concerns. --TeaDrinker (talk) 05:52, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 1820s in association football

Hello Strayacj,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 1820s in association football for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Xx236 (talk) 11:53, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:DUPLINK

Hey! I saw you reverted my edit on English public school football games. I guess my previous edit linked to the wrong guideline, but it's worth keeping in mind that linking the same article when it's already linked earlier in the article, much less the paragraph, is discouraged via the MOS:DUPLINK guideline. I've reverted it back, along with removing and working on other links – if you think it's useful to keep any of the links in that I removed, feel free to restore them again, I won't fight on it or anything. :) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 20:05, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Edinburgh. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 18:35, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]