User talk:Stranger43286

Hi guys. You can contact me by posting a massage in my Wikipedia talk page or by my YouTube channel!

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Gaplow43286! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Pachu Kannan (talk) 16:51, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pachu Kannan Thanks bro 😄 Gaplow43286 (talk) 03:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gaplow43286 Yeah, stay well. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 16:55, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am a YouTuber!

My YouTube channel name is "Strange Gamer Plays" (username is @Stranger43286), with 63 subscribers. Gaplow43286 (talk) 02:53, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads-up, Wikipedia isn't for advertising your socials. I'd strongly advise removing that stuff from your userpage and whatnot. Sirocco745 (talk) 09:46, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

English

Do you need help in writing English? I can teach you how to write proper sentences. Proper English is useful for responding, editing and creating pages. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 16:48, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Bangladesh internet blackout moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2024 Bangladesh internet blackout. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 05:42, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Improvement

We should Improve more pages related to Student–People's uprising or 2024 Bangladesh quota reform movement. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 16:57, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have already created a draft, the page in draftspace is getting Improved rapidly. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 16:57, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Stranger43286. Thank you for your work on 35 July. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Weller talk 13:52, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello, I'm Owais Al Qarni. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Student–People's uprising have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 07:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Owais Al Qarni Is image you're using is important? BangladeshiStranger🇧🇩 (talk) 07:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is important and highly relevant to this section.–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 07:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t' wants to involved in a edit war and I respect your opinions. But he's just giving speech and I don’t' see his supporters fighting with police like students. You can just add party's name in Infobox. I inform other editors to resolving this dispute

@BangladeshiEditorInSylhet @Mehedi Abedin @Ahammed Saad What you think guys? BangladeshiStranger🇧🇩 (talk) 07:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Stranger43286 To me, the photo has some relevancy but it doesn’t portray the core environment of the movement. Also, the non-cooperation movement was primarily centred on Dhaka which resulted the march of Dhaka. We could use relevant image instead of that. Mehedi Abedin 08:01, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also the text on the article don't exactly reflect the photo's importance specifically. Mehedi Abedin 08:03, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral - I am neutral in the situation here. The image though is not as relevant to the page. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 11:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with @Mehedi Abedin Ahammed Saad (talk) 14:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can also add sources to prove that this image is important. BangladeshiStranger🇧🇩 (talk) 07:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I get 2 supports and @al-Qarni get 0 support. So I can undone the image. BangladeshiStranger🇧🇩 (talk) 13:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"September 2017 bridge incident" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect September 2017 bridge incident has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 20 § September 2017 bridge incident until a consensus is reached. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 06:47, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]