User talk:Storkenleg

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Storkenleg, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains^(talk) 00:38, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tip of the day...

Lead Section Size

The lead section of a Wikipedia article is the section before the first heading. The table of contents, if displayed, generally appears between the lead section and the first subheading.

Rule of thumb: If a topic deserves a heading or subheading, then it deserves short mention in the lead.

The lead section should contain up to four paragraphs, depending on the length of the article, and should provide a preview of the main points the article will make, summarizing the primary reasons the subject matter is interesting or notable. The lead should be capable of standing alone as a concise overview of the article, should be written in a clear and accessible style, should be carefully sourced like the rest of the text, and should encourage the reader to want to read more. The following table has some general guidelines for the length of the lead section:

< 15,000 characters	medium size	> 30,000 characters
one or two paragraphs	two or three paragraphs	three or four paragraphs

Prior tip – Tips library – Next tip

Summary essay:

WP:CREATELEAD

Ways to improve El Salvador at the CONCACAF Gold Cup

Hi, I'm Meatsgains. Storkenleg, thanks for creating El Salvador at the CONCACAF Gold Cup!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Meatsgains^(talk) 01:23, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Panama at the CONCACAF Gold Cup moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Panama at the CONCACAF Gold Cup, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:38, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Panama at the CONCACAF Gold Cup has been accepted

Panama at the CONCACAF Gold Cup, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 13:18, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Articles on CONCAAF

Hi, I suggest that in your 'country at the CONCACAF Gold Cup Championships' articles, you follow the trends of similar articles like in this example and in that example. You don't have to give background about the tournament in each of the 'country at the CONCACAF Gold Cup Championships' articles. Most similar articles don't do that. Thank you for your articles. I already fixed one (Suriname) you should do the same but if you don't ,I won't fight it. Happy editing. JC7V-talk 19:36, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Suriname at the CONCACAF Gold Cup moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Suriname at the CONCACAF Gold Cup, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 08:13, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suriname at the CONCACAF Gold Cup (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vincent60030 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Reads more like about the Gold Cup itself than about the team or so. Please rewrite according to this.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Suriname at the CONCACAF Gold Cup and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Suriname at the CONCACAF Gold Cup, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

VKZY^LUFan (talk) (Mind the Gap!) 03:27, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Storkenleg! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! VKZY^LUFan (talk) (Mind the Gap!) 03:27, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Panama at the CONCACAF Gold Cup) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Panama at the CONCACAF Gold Cup.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Thanks for not giving up on this article, and for adding the references it needed

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|DannyS712}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DannyS712 (talk) 01:07, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 1953–54 Four Hills Tournament

Hello, Storkenleg,

Thanks for creating 1953–54 Four Hills Tournament! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 16:17, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (1955–56 Four Hills Tournament) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 1955–56 Four Hills Tournament.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|PCN02WPS}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 22:58, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chile at the Copa América, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raúl Toro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:36, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jamaica at the Copa América moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jamaica at the Copa América, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:28, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Suriname at the CONCACAF Gold Cup

Hello, Storkenleg. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Suriname at the CONCACAF Gold Cup".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:53, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

El Salvador at the CONCACAF Gold Cup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Kingston and Foxboro

Honduras at the CONCACAF Gold Cup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kingston

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:58, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Uruguay at the Copa América, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diego Pérez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Uruguay at the Copa América, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page José Andrade (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:45, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jamaica at the Copa América concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jamaica at the Copa América, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jamaica at the Copa América

Hello, Storkenleg. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jamaica at the Copa América".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Snowycats (talk) 17:49, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]