User talk:Storialist

This is Storialist's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barlamane (April 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Barlamane and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Barlamane, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:21, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CommanderWaterford, and thank you for your quick answer. Can you please explain what is not reliable in the sources that I have shared. I have appended 8 quality sources for the article, including known organizations such as HRW, Freedom House, and le Desk, who made a full investigation about this website. I do not think that there is an article in the NewYork Times or BBC about this website, but it is not a reason to say that other sources are not reliable. Can you please elaborate more on the sources aspect, given that what I put in the article is the best sources you could find about this matter, and that it is a notable subject in Morocco, the country where I come from. There is even an article in French about the same subject, with the same sources.

Thank you in advance for clarifying.-- Storialist (talk) 12:10, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Storialist Sure, those are unfortunately all passing mentions and not in-depth, independent coverage ��Wikipedia:SIGCOV which is needed to establish sufficient notability per Wikipedia:NORG. CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:15, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@CommanderWaterford Hello again. I am not really understanding the argument that you are mentioning (i.e. those are unfortunately all passing mentions and not in-depth, independent coverage). Can you explain to me please how this full in depth independent investigation made by an independent famous media in Morocco, and just dedicated for "Barlamane", is not fulfilling the criteria that you are mentioning of "in-depth" and "independence"? I would appreciate your answer as this will help us go forward. Thank you. -- Storialist (talk) 09:16, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@CommanderWaterford - Can you please answer my last question or guide me to contact some admin who can look into that matter if you do not have time? Thank you. -- Storialist (talk) 11:48, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First of all you need at least three of those sources, you have (perhaps) one. Secondly your source is not able to be translated so english Reviewers are not able to evaluate it. Lastly as far as I see this article is not dedicated only to your subject, so I am sorry but it does not fit. You can for sure resubmit to see if another reviewer is of different opinion but I would be surprised. CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:52, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@CommanderWaterford - I know that you do not have time, but have you gone through all the sources I have provided before you gave your conclusions? Also to my knowledge it is not an obligation to have sources in English, unless you want to keep English Wikipidia only about USA and UK subjects. Can you connect me with an admin who speaks French? I think they will be more helpful and understanding? Thank you. -- Storialist (talk) 12:23, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Storialist! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:21, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Defamation Press in Morocco (May 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Defamation Press in Morocco and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Defamation Press in Morocco, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:26, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Defamation Press in Morocco (May 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Defamation Press in Morocco and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Defamation Press in Morocco, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:36, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Defamation Press in Morocco (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Grand'mere Eugene was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia already has an article on Omar Radi, which needs updating. Better to focus on that.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Defamation Press in Morocco and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Defamation Press in Morocco, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 19:54, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Grand'mere Eugene was:

Seems to violate Wp:NOR, being more an essay.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 19:56, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barlamane (July 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No improvement since last review. Articles are improved by editing and referencing, not by mere passage of time. Some sources are not WP:RS, and do not collectively provide enough significant coverage to establish notability. Especially given the somewhat contentious nature of the article, strong referencing is needed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Barlamane and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Barlamane, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:36, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Defamation Press in Morocco (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Defamation Press in Morocco and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Defamation Press in Morocco, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 00:14, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Barlamane

Hello, Storialist. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Barlamane, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Defamation Press in Morocco

Hello, Storialist. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Defamation Press in Morocco, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Defamation Press in Morocco

Hello, Storialist. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Defamation Press in Morocco".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:14, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]