User talk:Stoneice02
If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom and start with an appropriate heading, for better formatting. You can just press the plus sign (+) on the top of this page to do that. Don't forget to sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~
To avoid fragmented discussions, if you leave a comment for me, I will most likely respond to it in here, on my talk page, in an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, always feel free to respond to it there, on your talk page. Remember we can use our watch list to keep track and know when each other respond to each comment. Thank you!
Hooray!
[edit]I'm known as a good man! Anyways, thanks for the user page comment. Other than that, good luck trying to pay for that laptop... --The preceding signed comment was added by StonedChipmunk and you can contact them here. 02:18, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
[edit]Thanks for your help with the Transportation section of Lawrence. I was really surprised to hear that 213 is named after the mall, and not vice versa. I'm originally from Tyngsboro, so until my recent move to Lowell (and my father to Haverhill), I had very little reason to travel as far east as Methuen. CSZero 14:50, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- No problem. I lived in Methuen most of my life until I graduated college in 2002 when I moved to Haverhill. The Loop is named for the configuration of the highways, and after it became somewhat popular, they decided to name 213, The Loop Connector, to hopefully bring more customers to it. Stoneice02 15:00, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Here's a question for you: The Merrimack Valley article (which you've worked on as well) has this sentence: "The western region, including Greater Lowell and Haverhill/Lawrence/Methuen, is generally more urbanized than the eastern region." I originally had that saying Lawrence/Methuen, but someone added Haverhill. First, is something like "Greater Lawrence" an often-used term like "Greater Lowell" is, instead of the list of those two cities? I've never heard the term, and I've never heard anyone consider Andover a suburb of Lawrence (*maybe* North Andover, though) so I don't know what it'd incorporate. Secondly, does the Lawrence/Methuen area include Haverhill? I guess that editor is correct that Haverhill has more in common with the Lowell/Lawrence area than it does to say, Newburyport, even though it is so far east. CSZero 15:44, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Good points. Haverhill is usually designated on its own as "Greater Haverhill" and includes, I believe, Groveland, Bradford, Hamilton, West Newbury, Georgetown, and sometimes even Plaistow. Greater Lawrence, on the other hand, is just Methuen, Lawrence, Andover, and North Andover. But yes, both terms are used regularly. I've never heard of Andover being considered a suburb of Lawrence, though. I wouldn't consider that to be the case for Andover or North Andover. And yeah, Haverhill should be grouped in with Greater Lawrence. It's always pissed me off since I moved to Haverhill that I get the Haverhill edition of the Eagle Tribune which covers Greater Haverhill and very little from Greater Lawrence. Stoneice02 19:30, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Here's a question for you: The Merrimack Valley article (which you've worked on as well) has this sentence: "The western region, including Greater Lowell and Haverhill/Lawrence/Methuen, is generally more urbanized than the eastern region." I originally had that saying Lawrence/Methuen, but someone added Haverhill. First, is something like "Greater Lawrence" an often-used term like "Greater Lowell" is, instead of the list of those two cities? I've never heard the term, and I've never heard anyone consider Andover a suburb of Lawrence (*maybe* North Andover, though) so I don't know what it'd incorporate. Secondly, does the Lawrence/Methuen area include Haverhill? I guess that editor is correct that Haverhill has more in common with the Lowell/Lawrence area than it does to say, Newburyport, even though it is so far east. CSZero 15:44, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Re:ECAC Hockey League
[edit]Thank you, you are correct. I was trying to make the college ice hockey conference articles uniform and most of them had it with two capital letters. So I'll go about correcting the others to make things uniform. Freddiem 04:17, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Block
[edit]This account has been blocked, based on information that you are under legal restrictions that preclude editing Wikipedia. Please contact me via email if there is some reason to reconsider the issue. --Michael Snow 20:14, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- I'm a bit confused by this news report - will they let him out in two and a half years or twenty-one and a half years? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 17:49, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Opie and Anthony's Traveling Virus Comedy Tour (2007), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Opie and Anthony's Traveling Virus Comedy Tour (2007) fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Opie and Anthony's Traveling Virus Comedy Tour (2007), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Opie and Anthony's Traveling Virus Comedy Tour (2007) itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 06:36, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Opie and Anthony's Traveling Virus Comedy Tour (2007), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 07:00, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit]
Hello Stoneice02! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- William Beroza - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:11, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Keith Wann for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Keith Wann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Wann until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 16:15, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
The article Warband (games) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence this gaming term passes WP:GNG. Non-notable jargon.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 20:26, 23 January 2020 (UTC)