User talk:Stomper 33

Welcome!

Hello, Stomper 33, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Vejvančický (talk) 10:35, 17 January 2010 (UTC) --Vejvančický (talk) 10:35, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zane cozens

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Zane cozens requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Vejvančický (talk) 10:35, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of surviving silent film actors has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of surviving silent film actors was changed by Stomper 33 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.881538 on 2015-07-13T01:42:44+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:42, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Connormah (talk) 02:17, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Longest Recorded Human Lifespans

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Longest Recorded Human Lifespans. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Oldest people. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Oldest people. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Cabayi (talk) 08:29, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Lake Taupo Ecological Disaster 2019 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Lake Taupo Ecological Disaster 2019, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:52, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lake Taupo Ecological Disaster 2019

Hello, Stomper 33. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lake Taupo Ecological Disaster 2019".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DannyS712 (talk) 08:12, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jacinda Ardern, you may be blocked from editing. I have again removed the addition you added to Jacinda Ardern because it is inaccurate, unreferenced and contains POV. If you restore it you risk being blocked from editing. Moriori (talk) 07:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC) Moriori (talk) 07:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is not inaccurate, it is referenced and true - as you know. If you follow the reference it is supported. I suggest you are politically motivated. And please, do not threaten me.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jacinda Ardern, you may be blocked from editing. --IdiotSavant (talk) 10:15, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive re-editing. If you continue to vandalize free and supported contributions to Wikipedia, as you didwith Jacinda Ardern, you may be blocked from editing. I note you have a history of editing without good reason. Again, your political views - like Moriori need to be parked up. Disappointing behaviour.

August 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. gadfium 09:26, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]