User talk:Stokerbean

January 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Comparison of remote desktop software has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Comparison of remote desktop software was changed by Stokerbean (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.969401 on 2016-01-04T09:56:32+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:56, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NoMachine

I am sorry, but the page clearly states: To be included in this list, the product must be notable, which means it must have an article written first. Redlinks or entries not linked to an article will be removed. NoMachine has no own article, so it is removed. The Banner talk 16:10, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello, I'm The Banner. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Comparison of remote desktop software have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. The Banner talk 16:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NoMachine (June 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Girth Summit were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The only source is the company's website - we can't establish notability from that alone. See WP:NCORP for discussion of the sourcing requirements for articles about companies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NoMachine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:NoMachine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GirthSummit _(blether) 17:01, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stokerbean! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GirthSummit _(blether) 17:01, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

I have requested a sockpuppet investigation, as I doubt that you are playing fair and square: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stokerbean. The Banner talk 15:42, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was actually trying to fix the page I represent with a neutral tone. Obviously I wasn't successful and another user changed what I wrote, and it has improved somewhat. I removed a redirect I never added in the first place. I hadn't realised that a NoMachine page existed, so instead of going through the pains of submitting a new one, I started to edit the existing one thinking that the problem causing all these issues was that redirects weren't allowed. Thanks for the concern anyway. To vandalise was not my desire whatsoever. Stokerbean (talk) 20:05, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am not accusing you of vandalising. But I did notice that you were actively spamming. And I think you use fake-accounts to back that up. The investigation will sort that out. The Banner talk 20:27, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stokerbean. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 07:26, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

I have filed a second sockpuppet investigation ainst you as I have strongly the idea that you came up with sockpuppet3 en 4. See here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stokerbean. The Banner talk 15:49, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:NoMachine

Hello, Stokerbean. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "NoMachine".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:47, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]