User talk:StjepanHR/List of rulers of totalitarian and illiberal democracies

Roosevelt should be added?

Didn't he broke constitution rule of 2 terms? Clarificationgiven (talk) 06:16, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nope it was legal until 1951, when the 22 second amendment was added. Sopher99 (talk) 12:14, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think he should be added, but not because of that, but because of Executive Order 9066. I understand it was war-time decision, but it is classic example of democratic leaders who uses "illiberal" methods. HeadlessMaster (talk) 15:39, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I know it was, that's why it is "illiberal DEMOCRACY". If it was not constitutional, it would be dictatorship. HeadlessMaster (talk) 15:52, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is no totalitarian democracy.

There is only - Authoritarian governments - flawed democracies - or democracy Sopher99 (talk) 15:46, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I request you change the title to "list of rulers and leaders of flawed democracies" Sopher99 (talk) 15:49, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that those terms are commonly used anyway. Clarificationgiven (talk) 04:19, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy_Index Flawed democracy is a common term, and is what Putin's chavez's Ortega's and other leaders put up there are. Sopher99 (talk) 11:36, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]