User talk:Sththeychehe

June 2016

Hello, I'm Passengerpigeon. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to South Sydney Rabbitohs— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Passengerpigeon (talk) 23:56, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at South Sydney Rabbitohs with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Passengerpigeon (talk) 00:01, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at South Sydney Rabbitohs, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: South Sydney Rabbitohs was changed by Sththeychehe (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.940217 on 2016-06-05T01:00:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:00, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sththeychehe, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sththeychehe! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gamma ray has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Gamma ray was changed by Sththeychehe (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950902 on 2016-06-20T10:02:49+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 11:58, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sththeychehe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will never make unconstructive edits again and will try and enhance Wikipedia through my editing. I am sorry for the disruption. I think that I can make up for my misdemeanours by showing I can be constructive, seen in my suggestion for the edit of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brad_Smith_(footballer,_born_1994). I think that the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brad_Smith_(footballer,_born_1994) should be improved with this added, - "Smith made his first Premier League start against https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A.F.C._Bournemouth on the 16th of April 2016. in a 2-0 victory for his side. He made his second Premier League start on the 31st of April against https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swansea_City_A.F.C. in a 3-1 loss, and was sent off for a second yellow card in the 76th minute. Sththeychehe (talk) 08:38, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Given your most recent vandalism was yesterday and given your history of vandalism, why should we believe you now? You had several other second chances and chose to ignore them all. I'm not saying we won't ever consider unblocking you, only that you have so far failed to convince us that you'd never vandalise again. Yamla (talk) 11:22, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Can you please consider my request that I will never, ever make disruptive vandalising edits again. As I have shown with the above request, my knowledge is good enough to enhance wikipedia for all users, and that I will use this knowledge rather than vandalism in my usage of my account. If you unblock me, you can expect edits like the above, as well as other contributions, and can expect the knowledge that if I vandalise I will be blocked and banned forever, and therefore will not do this. I am a user of Wikipedia myself and know the frustration of finding a vandalised account, the reason that I joined myself. I erred in my vandalism, and you can expect not to see it again. Yours sincerely, Sththeychehe Sththeychehe (talk) 06:37, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am not particularly convinced by this unblock request, but to save the drama of having another declined request and your talk page access turned off, I'd like to see some evidence of some good faith edits. Pick any article you like, and on this talk page write some text that adds additional information to it and cites a reliable source that completely verifies the information. If you can do that, I might consider an unblock provided the blocking admin is comfortable with it. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:18, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Sththeychehe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

In response to Ritchie333's above comment I think that the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brad_Smith_(footballer,_born_1994) should be improved with this added, - "Smith made his first Premier League start against https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A.F.C._Bournemouth on the 16th of April 2016. in a 2-0 victory for his side. He made his second Premier League start on the 31st of April against https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swansea_City_A.F.C. in a 3-1 loss, and was sent off for a second yellow card in the 76th minute. ^[1] ^[2] I also believe that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sydney_Grammar_School should be edited in the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sydney_Grammar_School#Headmasters section. This should be added to the end of the first paragraph. Dr Vallance announced his upcoming resignation from the role in February 2016, and announced that he will leave the role at the conclusion of the first school term of 2017. The next Headmaster has not yet been announced. ^[3]

Accept reason:

As you have shown you can write content and add sources, I am happy to unblock you. However, if you make any edits that are not good faith, you will be reblocked immediately. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:06, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

.

Hi. I am reviewing this request with the blocking administrator now and will get back to you soon. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:36, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Sththeychehe. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Joseph2302 (talk) 11:57, 26 June 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Welcome

Hello Sththeychehe and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Gestrid (talk) 05:48, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Trent Alexander-Arnold

The article Trent Alexander-Arnold has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. JamesG5 (talk) 05:46, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am unable to reference it now; without access to a computer, could you please give me 1 day to do it?

As noted above, you have seven days to add references. This isn't a speedy delete, just a reminder. :) JamesG5 (talk) 06:03, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) I saw the notice here, did a quick Google search, found a source that I believe mentions everything the article mentions, and added it. JamesG5 then removed the notice, so I don't believe there's anything you need to do, Sththeychehe. -- Gestrid (talk) 06:11, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If, however, you plan to make more changes to the article and don't want to risk getting it deleted, I suggest you move it to the draft space. If you're not familiar with the process, you can ask someone else (including me) to move it for you. -- Gestrid (talk) 06:17, 12 July 2016 (UTC)thanks mate I had seen it just didn't have time to add it :) thanks again.[reply]

Nomination of Ovie Ejaria for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ovie Ejaria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ovie Ejaria until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 14:32, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Giblee Gorgas

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Giblee Gorgas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AlphaBetaGamma^{DeltaEpsilonZeta} 06:13, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Louis D. Goldsmith

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

The article Louis D. Goldsmith has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article was about a real person or group of people, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or an organized event, but did not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is actually significant enough for an encyclopedia article, you are free to re-create it, but this time you need to demonstrate that, which is best done by citing to reliable, secondary sources that are entirely unconnected to the topic.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Favonian (talk) 10:45, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
YOU MAY NOT LIKE LOUIS DANIEL AHARON GOLDSMITH BUT TO ME HIS NOTABLE (INSERT ANGRY EMOJI!!!) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sththeychehe (talk • contribs) 10:49, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Pyrimethamine, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 10:51, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Noel D'Souza for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Noel D'Souza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noel D'Souza until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:31, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Todd Sampson, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 04:02, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. - LouisAragon (talk) 12:17, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:12, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Connor McLennan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 08:55, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sththeychehe. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Scott Kashket. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 01:10, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Australia national under-17 soccer team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Melbourne City (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:39, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Changing sourced information without changing the source

Hello. In this edit you changed the details of the coaching staff at Hashtag United. However, the previous information was sourced to this article. By changing the information and not updating the source, it can give the appearance of deliberate falsification. Please ensure that you update sources when updating information. Thanks, Number 5 7 14:41, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Trent Ostler

The article Trent Ostler has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY as he hasn't played in a league match.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HawkAussie (talk) 01:57, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFOOTY does not mention a 'league' match. It mentions participating in a match between two fully professional teams, which Ostler did, playing in a match between Perth Glory and Western Sydney Wanderers, two clubs which are undeniably completely professional. I cannot see otherwise how Ostler may fail the requirements. If you find any suitable reason why it fails the requirements, please leave a message here. Sththeychehe (talk) 02:11, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Use of edit summaries/ inclusion of detailed, offesnive and unproven allegations

Pleae note that discussion on article content should be on the talk page of that article, not in edit summaries. Please also note that it is not good practice to include detailed, offensive and unproven allegations in an encyclopaedia. Jontel (talk) 05:08, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jontel, if you are referring to their comments such as "Please stop putting your political bias in the way of preserving Wikipedia's integrity" and "please stop putting propaganda into articles and deleting factual content and sources which are relevant", you are on pretty shaky ground yourself. Several of us have noticed your bias in your edits over a long period of time and several of us have had to revert your edits very recently, as you know, including this most recent reversion by the founder of Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jewish_Labour_Movement&diff=930108183&oldid=930092351 Please spare us the faux grievances/outrage, Jontel. Rodericksilly (talk) 15:55, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish Labour Movement

There appears to be a dispute regarding an edit you (and others) made last year to this page. Two far-left editors want it removed because it portrays Corbyn and company in a bad light, but others have supported its retention. Your contribution to the Talk page would be appreciated. Thanks. Rodericksilly (talk) 11:26, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that this message is in breach of two Wikipedia guidelines. Specifically: 'Campaigning is an attempt to sway the person reading the message, conveyed through the use of tone, wording, or intent. While this may be appropriate as part of a specific individual discussion, it is inappropriate to canvass with such messages.WP:CAN Also, 'Using someone's political affiliations as an ad hominem means of dismissing or discrediting their views, such as accusing them of being left-wing or right-wing, is...forbidden' WP:NPA Jontel (talk) 18:32, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, I'm Nehme1499. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Oday Dabbagh have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 13:04, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Finn Azaz article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. Giant Snowman 12:56, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, I understand. There is no 'reliable' source on the Internet, but it is true nonetheless. Not that it is the source of my knowledge of this, but it is even said on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nehemia_Azaz. Sththeychehe (talk) 02:41, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Eddy Bosnar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 10:34, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.foxsports.com.au/football/premier-league/liverpools-brad-smith-sent-off-against-swansea-as-manager-jurgen-klopp-rages/news-story/df4ad8bc03d8fd9eefd8cb87902995ed

[2] ttp://theworldgame.sbs.com.au/article/2016/04/18/socceroos-smith-starts-liverpools-win-over-bournemouth

[3] ttp://www.smh.com.au/nsw/sydney-grammar-school-headmaster-john-vallance-resigns-20160219-gmyxan.html

[1]

[2]

[3]