User talk:Stewartpalmer

Youngs Seafoods

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Youngs Seafoods, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.youngsbluecrest.co.uk/web/company_section/didyouknow.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), you can comment to that effect on Talk:Youngs Seafoods. Then you should do one of the following:

Make a note on the original website that re-use is permitted under the GFDL and state at Talk:Youngs Seafoods where we can find that note; or
Send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL.

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Garion96 (talk) 16:34, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Youngs_logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Youngs_logo.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:37, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Vacuumbedwithmask.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Vacuumbedwithmask.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —BigDT 00:06, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dsc00448.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Dsc00448.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —BigDT 00:07, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Vacuumbed.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Vacuumbed.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —BigDT 00:08, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added to the page Latex_and_PVC_fetishism do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Stephen Burnett 22:39, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Latex_and_PVC_fetishism. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Stephen Burnett 22:54, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Tesco

Hi. Kindly keep your point(s) of view out of this and all other Wikipedia articles you edit. Thank you. Mark83 21:30, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2007

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Tesco. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:39, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Face of Boe

Please do not add inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as it's considered to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JameiLei 22:11, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Vacbed

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Vacbed, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Vacbed is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Vacbed, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 13:36, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Faceofb02.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Faceofb02.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 05:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Faceofbo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Faceofbo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 05:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tim Mickleburgh

The article Tim Mickleburgh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable author, limited references, no awards.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MBisanz ^talk 05:54, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]