User talk:Stevenbfg

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Stevenbfg, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Moswento ^talky 11:21, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

re:Knuckles the Echidna

Done! « ₣M₣ » 18:39, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

C.S Lewis

While I personally agree with your edit, I had to revert it simply because there was no consensus as to whether Lewis should be called "Irish" or "British" (or a combination of the two, which was my second choice...) on the talk page. And I agree that Colress is not really a rival..hehe. --Τασουλα (talk) 00:18, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

British is non-descriptive. He should be identified as Irish as that what he was regionally. Thats like saying Sean Connery shouldn't be identified as Scottish first because he is British as well. Now if you don't mind i'll revert this. Stevenbfg (talk) 00:25, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm afraid you shouldn't revert this because you'll be breaking WP:BRD. Take it to the talk-page. And I didn't say I disagreed with you in the first place, but I still have to abide by the rules... --Τασουλα (talk) 00:28, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See the talk page in C.S. Lewis. Stevenbfg (talk) 00:33, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for making a thread there. There's something you need to know: There was an extensive debate that raged on for a very long time about this, there were people blocked, topic-banned I believe and a lot of grumbling...it was a war. I have no intention in getting involved with one again. Maybe I'll go edit some Pokemon articles...good luck anyway. --Τασουλα (talk) 00:36, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your edits to C. S. Lewis to the page's previous state. You must get consensus on the article's Talk page before making such a change. As mentioned above, there is a long history here, which you should review before re-opening this can of worms. -- Elphion (talk) 02:14, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please Help

Actor Jack O'Connell Himself Said That He Is "Half Irish" So That Makes Him Irish-english But Someone Locked Him As english So Please Could You Change His Nationality To Irish-english Or Help Me Get Some Irish wiki editor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.163.250.93 (talk) 13:21, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I can't do that. He may very well be Half Irish ethnically but he was born and raised in England and does not hold Irish citizenship. So I can't call him "Irish-English". Chris de Burgh would be someone who's technically "Irish-English". Stevenbfg (talk) 07:59, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Photogallery

I have opened a discussion on the talkpage of Irish people to avoid an editwar. But I have to say the the wide infobox is created on 26 June 2013. Perhaps you know this editor. The Banner talk 22:50, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It was a joint effort. I know Ken and asked him to make another png because he is a more experienced editor but he placed individual pictures instead which is where I came in. Stevenbfg (talk) 23:06, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You mean: he started and you made the infobox excessively wide.

The Banner talk 23:08, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't make it wide. It looked fine but then later on the image box became really wide and that white line appeared. That's why I changed it. You weren't even there so you don't know anything. Stevenbfg (talk) 23:10, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, okay. You deny every involvement.

BTW: Wellesley was born in Dublin. The Banner talk 23:20, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are being very childish here. I am only being honest. I didn't have to change the image box until it started going all funny. Why do you find that so hard to believe? Stevenbfg (talk) 23:27, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Duke of Wellington

"And Arthur Wellesly is not ethnically Irish at all." - how is the Duke of Wellington not ethnically Irish? He was born in Ireland, his parents where born in Ireland, and they also are of Irish parents. If you are requiring Irishmen as needing to be of Gaelic ancestry or purity then you are severely mistaken and know nothing about the complexities of ethnicity. Mabuska ^(talk) 00:04, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're right I guess. But who should we kick out to put him in? Stevenbfg (talk) 00:06, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm right full stop. No-one needs kicked out unfortunately as The Banner or someone simply made accommodation for them all. Simple solution. Mabuska ^(talk) 00:33, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not...

... make the infobox at Irish people so ridiculously wide. That serves no purpose. Do no start that edit war again, like you did last year. The Banner talk 23:44, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was simply doing it the same way as other ethnic groups like Scottish people. I think the pictures look all over the place on the current one and having their names under them makes it easier, but whatever. Stevenbfg (talk) 18:14, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RfD on Commons

Hello, maybe you want to have a say here. Are you the author of the photograph? -- SERGIO aka the Black Cat 13:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Stevenbfg. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Stevenbfg. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Stevenbfg. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Complaint about your edits of Antim Cup

Please see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive398#User%3AStevenbfg_reported_by_User%3A_Lado85_%28Result%3A_Filer_warned%29. You can respond there if you wish. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 14:20, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of History of rugby union matches between Fiji and Ireland for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article History of rugby union matches between Fiji and Ireland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of rugby union matches between Fiji and Ireland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 10:25, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Wiffen

A third opinion has been sought Billsmith60 (talk) 18:09, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What third option? You just reverted to your edit again. Stevenbfg (talk) 02:07, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]