User talk:Steven Crossin/Archive 42

Mediation Cabal: Case update

Dear Steven Crossin/Archive 42: Hello, this is to let you know that a Mediation Cabal case that you are involved in, or have some connection with:

Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/02 October 2011/Holodomor

is currently inactive as it has not been edited in at least a week. If the issues in the case have been resolved, please let us know on our talk page so we can close the case. If there are still issues that need to be addressed, let us know. If your mediator has become inactive, also let us know. The case will be closed in one month if it remains inactive. You can let us know what's going on by sending a message through to your mediator, Steven Crossin, on their talk page. Thanks! MedcabBot (talk) 12:19, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ouch!

	I've alerted the experts
	They tell me it doesn't look lethal. But just in case, a crack team of lab-coated specialists is heading your way to make sure you get the best ~~alcohol~~ medical care in the world. Get better soon. Cloveapple (talk) 06:29, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RFA thanks

Thank you for your support at my recent successful RFA. Being now the new fellow in the fraternity of administrators, I will do my best to live up to the confidence shown in me by others, will move slowly and carefully when using the mop, will seek input from others before any action of which I might be unsure, and will try not to break anything beyond repair. Best, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:08, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

24: Redemption

I have reviewed the article, please see the talk page for my comments. Malinaccier (talk) 03:48, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ta, will take a look on my break. Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 04:07, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Landeryou at BLPN

I have posted the Andrew Landeryou issues on the BLP noticeboard. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:52, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration motion regarding Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abortion

Resolved by motion at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification that: The Abortion case is supplemented as follows:

Remedy 1 of Abortion is amended to the following:
Any uninvolved administrator may semi-protect articles relating to Abortion and their corresponding talk pages, at his or her discretion, for a period of up to three years from 7 December 2011. Pages semi-protected under this provision are to be logged.

For the Arbitration Committee, Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 12:13, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this

24 DVD covers

Hey, I just noticed all the covers for the 24 DVD images have been changed, with the previous versions being deleted. Now don't take any offense to this, but why did you change them? Since 24 is an American show, it's most logical and best practice to use region 1 covers (they also don't feature all those ugly logos on them). The color scheme for the infobox and episode list are also derived from the region 1 covers. I understand the region 4 covers do feature other cast members besides Bauer, but there is already cast images present in the article to display that season's cast. I was wondering if this could be switched back? Thanks. Drovethrughosts (talk) 01:51, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. I uploaded over the other versions of the DVD covers for a few reasons, the other images were too large and looked a bit odd (they seemed three-dimensional) and not flat. I agree with you about the logos though, so perhaps we could use the DVD covers from Region 2 instead (same image but without the massive classification logo)? They're shown here. We can always update the infoboxes. I was actually thinking about rewriting the season articles at some point either way. I have to say that stuff like this is way too long. Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 02:02, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still in favor of using the region 1 covers (for the reasons I listed above and that's what was originally there). I can't remember how large they were, but they should be 250px in the infobox, as currently they're like 192px which is too small. If you don't object, I'd like to upload the region 1 covers. I'll have them be 250px and will use flat images. Drovethrughosts (talk) 14:15, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, I am afraid I'm going to have to disagree here. It's true that it's an American TV show, yes, but it is distributed worldwide, and if possible our articles should demonstrate that. Region 1 (which has the cover art you suggest) is USA and Canada only, where regions 2 and 4 (which have the alternative cover art I suggested encompasses (from the DVD region article) Europe (except Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus), Middle East, Egypt, Japan, South Africa, Swaziland, Lesotho, Greenland, French Overseas departments and territories for region 2, and Mexico, South America, Central America, Caribbean, New Zealand, Australia, Papua New Guinea and most of Oceania for region 4. I also note that originally, the articles had no DVD covers at all, instead the cast photo was used in the info box. We have a few options here. A composite image in the info box (displaying the two alternate covers side by side) won't work with our non-free content policies, so that's out. I noticed the season articles for the TV series House uses alternate region covers (season 1 uses region 2, season 2 uses region 4, season 3 uses region 1 etc) but that's a bit inconsistent. We could also use a screenshot from a major event or plot within the season, and use that in the info box, or we could try and locate a promotional poster for each season and use that in the info box, or we could revert back to the cast photo in the info box (which represents the season much better than a DVD cover anyways. As for the resolution of the pictures, we've been standardizing portrait images to 200px for a while (see the info boxes of Allison Taylor, Jack Bauer and Bill Buchanan as a few examples) so we could always bump the resolution up to 200px. If we revert back to the cast image, 300px was the norm, so we could always do that instead. Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 21:16, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Then I guess I'm in favor in reinstating the cast images. The cast images were actually used in those articles for as long as I can remember until just a few months ago. Agree on using the cast images for infobox instead? Drovethrughosts (talk) 13:39, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, that sounds good to me. Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 23:26, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Any chance you would be opposed to using this image instead as the promo poster for the season 7 article? It was main promo poster for that season (used in both region DVD covers), and well, looks better. Opinion? Drovethrughosts (talk) 16:00, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, not to be anal, but "better" is of course subjective. Indeed, I picked the alternative poster because I thought it looked better, with the reflecting image of the Washington Monument and all. He's also in the attire that he appeared in for quite a few promo images (such as the one in the Jack Bauer infobox). I suppose my answer is, not opposed, but I prefer this image. Which I realise is not much of an answer, but it's the best I can do in my caffeine deprived state :) Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 20:29, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, no big deal, was just wondering. It can be left as is. Season articles do look nice though with those posters. Drovethrughosts (talk) 23:18, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah they do. They'd look a lot better with a [{WP:FL|little golden star]] in the top right corner :). I feel it's a shame something like an infobox image kicked up such a storm, that time could've been used actually improving the article itself. Well, what can we do. Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 23:21, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

24 Redemption poster

Hello again, I found a source for the film poster: http://www.impawards.com/tv/twenty_four_redemption.html. In the film project, we try to use the original poster as they showcase how a film was promoted on it's release opposed to later on it's career. Using a film poster also eliminates arguments over which Region DVD cover should be used as this poster focuses on the original release date. As for that website you gave me with genres, it also refers to "TV Series" as a genre so I wouldn't call it appropriate. Rotten Tomatoes also calls some films as "Foreign" as a genre which is inappropriate as well. Can we keep it action for now? Andrzejbanas (talk) 04:04, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I personally tend to favour DVD covers, but I see the guideline does recommend film posters instead. As for the genre, it doesn't bother me that much. Action fits well, and while I feel major aspects of the film qualify as drama as well and aren't really covered by the Action genre, am happy to concede on that. The film poster should be below 250 x 375 px though. I'll poke an admin to get the details sorted out. Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 04:24, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cool! Thank you. Andrzejbanas (talk) 04:58, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Plant sources

Steven,

Happened to see your query on Casliber's talk page and thought I'd let you know about the Biodiversity Heritage Library and Botanicus. Both have full text of a number of botanical journals. They have a taxonomic search function, so it can be a great way to find a journal article with a description of a particular species and get a short article started. Choess (talk) 06:33, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. Thanks for those links, most appreciated :) Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 21:19, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non free reduce

Fastily has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

For your troubles. Thanks again! Best, FASTILY ^(TALK) 21:14, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 06:16, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MisMove

Steven, can you either undo this move, or else tell me how to get it undone? I had good reasons for it, but now I realize it wasn't the right way to address a problem that was bugging me. I thought about just moving it again myself, but I'm worried I'll screw something up. HuskyHuskie (talk) 05:31, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. As requested I've reverted the move. Regards, Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 06:16, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. Your help is always appreciated. (Have you ever considered standing for the mop?) HuskyHuskie (talk) 00:05, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, You are very funny. Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 00:21, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mentorship

GoodDay is asking abour mentorship. He or she posted this on your user page and probably meant it to go on your talk page. Cloveapple (talk) 07:01, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I didn't notice it. I've posted it here. Cheers, Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 07:17, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mentorship info

Howdy Steve. It's been suggested at my Rfc/U, that I could use a mentor, around British & Irish political articles. How does one go about acquiring one? GoodDay (talk) 02:35, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, well one would generally approach a user who they wish to be their mentor and ask them directly. It's only generally in cases where ArbCom imposes mentors on users that the mentoree has no real say in who their mentors is. I have a program that I use to teach users the ropes on Wikipedia, so I'm not sure if this will be of any help to you, but let me know either way. I'm reasonably free at the moment. Regards, Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 07:17, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Howabout you? as a mentor? GoodDay (talk) 07:28, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm....in theory I could. I'm not overly familiar with you at all, the areas you edit or the concerns that were raised at the RFC/U. I think the first thing I need to know is how you think mentorship will help you, that it's something you'd take seriously and be willing to have conditions imposed, if necessary. While I haven't read over the RFC carefully yet, I do note that many were in favour of a mentorship option, but others advocated blocking or outright topic bans. It'd be helpful if you could provide me a brief summary of the issues that got you to this point, as well as what you plan to do in future to prevent these issues from happening again. That's the main purpose of mentorship, guiding you along and ultimately keeping you out of trouble, but you need to help yourself at the same time. If you could answer these few questions while I read over the RFC that would be good. Cheers, Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 08:13, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I basically need help in formulating my concerns on those articles, whenever such concerns come up. My past presentations have met with 'negative' responses. GoodDay (talk) 08:19, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A mentor can't really help you formulate your arguments for you. They can, however, better help you understand policy so you are able to make proper, reasonable comments that are within policy. I am hoping you can answer the rest of my questions, however. Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 08:23, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My major 'shortcoming' is that I've no empathy for the political sensivities of British & Irish editors, at those articles. I have (since Nov 21, 2011) been practicing restraint, by keeping myself out of the current varies squabbles on those articles (an example: Wales). -- GoodDay (talk) 08:47, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can see from the RFC you have had some issues with these articles. What I'm not really seeing is an understanding for the need to change. Mentorship should not be taken lightly, it's generally a lesser sanction as opposed to say, an outright topic ban or blocking. What I want to know is how you think I can help you? Do you want me to guide you through policy, do you want to use me as a sounding board before you engage in discussions or is it something else. I cannot help you change the minds of others, that is what discussion is for. But I can help guide you where possible. I noticed on your RFC you stated you didn't want your mentor to tell you not to contribute to these articles. While I agree in the long term, I think that taking a break for a little while (say a month) may help us turn things around. Tempers are still hot, and while it's not just you in the wrong, often taking the high road is best. We will spend that month working on other things. If that doesn't work for you, then I'm afraid I can't really help much. Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 22:07, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Taking a month off, is reasonable. I would like to use ya as a sounding board. If I have any future concerns about those articles, I'd like to get your opinon on how to approach those articles with those concerns. Guide me on how to post those concerns in a way that won't get heated responses. GoodDay (talk) 22:13, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alrighty, sounds good. Take a look at this page, and let me know if anything there you think you could learn something from. Steve Public (talk) 22:24, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I'll look through it. GoodDay (talk) 22:45, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TBH, there's nothing there, that applies to me. GoodDay (talk) 23:02, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No matter. I'm sure we can come up with something to help show that you can change, and give you ways to express your views on these articles without creating conflict. It's not that hard. I've been doing it for years. Let's see what DBD says and go from there. Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 22:50, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm willing to accpet 2 mentors (if that's aloud). GoodDay (talk) 22:52, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi both – I happy to mentor alone, in tandem, or not at all. The choice is GD's D B D 23:17, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We're from different areas of the world, and have different areas of expertise. I think us working in tandem would be beneficial. If you're happy, I'll write up something and post it at the RFC to be ratified by those who are commenting there, and then we can work on other issues. But let's get the RFC settled first, shall we? Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 23:25, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It seems we 3 are agreed. I'd appreciate if you could write up as you suggest. I agree we should get the RFC settled. D B D 23:39, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Steven Crossin. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television.
Message added 11:59, 10 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

This discussion concerns the DVD covers that were added to the 24 season articles in August AussieLegend (talk) 11:59, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied there, and will continue to participate in the discussion. Regards, Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 21:08, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Latest mentorship candidate

Can you please both have a word with him re: this. Thanks. Daicaregos (talk) 15:27, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All sorted out now. Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 21:08, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zoophilia again

User:Someone963852 is continuing to revert my edits and the edits of another user. Since the WP:DRN didn't help at all, I am requesting that you look into this matter again. Plateau99 (talk) 23:57, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The comments that I made at DRN stand, the article title is Zoophillia, so changing every reference to Zoophilia to Zoosexuality is inappropriate. If the issue is still persisting, let me know (as I've been inactive fot a few days. Regards, Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 21:08, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MedCab

Do you mind helpign me mediate the case of Omnedon and Nyttend which I referred to the MedCabal - I had a look at the Wikiquette dispute, but there wre content issues mixed in with the conduct issues. I separated the content issues from the conduct issues, and the referral only focusses on the content issues.

Here's a heads-up on the case: [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thehistorian10 (talk • contribs)

Sorry about the delay in my reply, been rather busy. I see in the meantime another mediator has signed on to help you out, so all seems good. Poke me if things get stuck, but I've got the case on my watchlist. Regards, Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 21:08, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh bugger, that was a different case entirely!!!! Do you mind restoring the case to its original state? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thehistorian10 (talk • contribs)

Hmm, I do hope you will re-add the comment I left. There was no text alteration apart from my comment in this edit by me, so I hope you will undo your edit. I'd also encourage you to read our recommendations for mediators, as well as what MedCab is not for. I've poked your co-mediator to help you get this case back on track. Don't be discouraged. Mediation is tough and can take years to become skilled in. Let your co-mediator guide you and you will learn a lot. Regards, Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 21:23, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CUendorse -> endorse ?

Hi, I suppose this edit should be "endorse" (like here) instead of "CUendorse", shouldn't it? Now it appears "status unknown"... Thanks, Xtv - (my talk) - (que dius que què?) 22:30, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, you're correct of course. Bit of a brain fart on my part. Thanks for picking that up. Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 22:32, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad images arbitration case

An arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Muhammad images. Evidence that you wish the Arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence sub-page, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Muhammad images/Evidence. Please add your evidence by December 4, 2011, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can contribute to the case workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Muhammad images/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Alexandr Dmitri (talk) 15:14, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yay!

We needed that. Poor Sko had to run double duty on the Arb report and ITN sections ;) ResMar 05:36, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't hold your hopes too high :-) I'm kinda in the deep end here, so it will probably be a pretty shabby first report, but I'll do my best. Regards, Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 05:42, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Steven Crossin. You have new messages at TransporterMan's talk page.
Message added 22:47, 22 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

TransporterMan (TALK) 22:47, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tis the season...

		Happy holidays.
		Best wishes for joy and happiness. Guerillero \| My Talk 23:39, 22 December 2011 (UTC) [reply]

arb report

Nice work indeed. Some people are wondering what the h... this Privy Council thing is and hoping it will be quietly dropped as a slow-motion car accident in the making. :-) $Tony (talk)$ 08:42, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I can see from your copy-editing that I am still very rough around the edges, but I am still pleased thatI didn't make a complete idiot of myself. Gave up on those line graphs Jorgenev made, so I just went for pie charts. After all, everyone loves pie. Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 08:56, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

	Merry Christmas!
	Best wishes, Fleet Command (talk) 18:01, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

National emblem

Myself & Daicaregos are continuing are disagreement on that article. I may need your monitoring of my conduct, there. GoodDay (talk) 17:21, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, it might be wise to take a break from editing in the same area as Daicaregos for a while. A self-imposed interaction ban, so to speak. I think it might be for the best for the time being. Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 23:01, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sound advice. Best, he & I continue to avoid each other. GoodDay (talk) 03:04, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mandy

Hmm, yes, it's all blank now! :) What are your thoughts? Penny Lane's America (talk) 05:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, good-o. Just wanted to have a bit of a chat (as I wasn't sure if you were noticing the new messages notice (When someone edits your talk page). I see you are interested in 24 (as am I) and you seem rather well-versed in the style of Wikipedia. Have you edited here before? I may be able to show you a few things on how WP works. There were a few issues I wanted to bring up but I wasn't sure if you were getting the notices. Free for a chat? Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 05:15, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, absolutely. Penny Lane's America (talk) 05:20, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good-o. Maybe you could tell me a little bit about yourself (a little about your background, your interests, what led you to start editing Wikipedia) and I can show you a few basic things? Probably one of the biggest is the use of edit summaries. I've provided a short description here, but basically for every edit you make, provide a brief description of what you did in the edit. For example, I put "reply" each time I reply to a talk page message. Just a little tip. But tell me a bit about yourself and what you plan to do here, and I'll tell you about myself. It also might come in handy to add this page to your watchlist, which allows you to keep an eye on a variety of Wikipedia pages. Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 05:28, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, sorry about the edit summary, I was trying to get the critical reaction sections up quick so as to not leave the pages incomplete for too long, and I made a few oversights. My bad. Thanks, though. I'm a fiction writer and pretty big fan of 24 with computer experience, so I decided to help out with the pages for fun and to help the show out. Penny Lane's America (talk) 05:55, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A big fan, eh? I somewhat doubt you're a bigger fan than me :p. Are you very familiar with Wikipedia? I'm sure I could show you a thing or two, but it all depends on your purpose here :-) Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 05:59, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm somewhat familiar, but I'm no expert. I pick up pretty easily, though.Penny Lane's America (talk) 06:03, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hm...perhaps a few things to get you started. Martha Logan is what we call a good article, which means its basically well written and has been reviewed, but is not as good as a featured article. I suppose that shows the balance between plot and real world info that we look for in articles. I noticed with references you were adding, they were generally URLs only, so I've got a script that will should help you with adding references. Go to this page and add this line of code to it: importScript('User:Steven Crossin/reftools.js');, then clear your cache. When you have done that, you should see a new button in the edit toolbar (curly brackets). It is a way to add references that are better formatted. Give it a go? Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 06:14, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DBD

As one of GoodDays mentors I would like to inform you that I have reservations about the suitability of his other mentor DBD. I have left him a message on his talk page and would appreciate it if you could take a look at it. talk:DBD#Goodday.27s mentor. Thanks. Carson101 (talk) 16:04, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, would I have edited the article myself? No, I tend to offer guidance, observe and discuss more than anything. But I don't disagree with his actions. Simply undoing an edit with the equivalent of "I disagree" when an edit has been made with reasoning isn't really following BRD at all. Nevertheless, I've added the page to my watchlist and will keep my eyes peeled. Regards, Steven Crossin ^{Join the DR army!} 21:36, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation Cabal: Case update

Dear Steven Crossin/Archive 42: Hello, this is to let you know that a Mediation Cabal case that you are involved in, or have some connection with:

Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/02 October 2011/Holodomor

is currently inactive as it has not been edited in at least a week. If the issues in the case have been resolved, please let us know on our talk page so we can close the case. If there are still issues that need to be addressed, let us know. If your mediator has become inactive, also let us know. The case will be closed in one month if it remains inactive. You can let us know what's going on by sending a message through to your mediator, Steven Crossin, on their talk page. Thanks! MedcabBot (talk) 06:18, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

	Happy New Year!
	Happy new year and we will see you contributing in 2012 of the new year. We are hoping to see and help to make Wikipedia better! Katarighe (Talk · Contributions · E-mail) 22:51, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	PRETTY RAINBOW STAR I didn't even know this one existed Gurch (talk) 23:00, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]