User talk:Steve.Slilaty

Welcome!

Hi Steve.Slilaty! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:00, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft

Your draft article appears to be a verbatim copy of the Pfizer article, simply replacing the name of the company throughout. I'm not sure why you've done this, but it's not a great idea. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:00, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. I have to start somewhere. I did not publish it now, it is a draft. And I got rate limited and captcha blocked.

Steve.Slilaty (talk) 21:44, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 21:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since you admit here that you only wish to edit about your own company, I have blocked you as WP:NOTHERE. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 21:48, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Steve.Slilaty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a contributor, and going off of public filings, public disclosure, public information with cited sources. I am building an encyclopedia, and I am learning how to do so as we speak, however, you have now prevented me from doing so. I have not even published anything, I was working on compiling a list of cited sources and public information. I took a template and was working off that. I did not try to publish it. What you have stated is misleading, I am not here for one reason, I stated simply I was working on a draft and that was what I am doing at this time. There were some steps I followed, and they were not supposed to lead to a indefinite ban. The sources of citations I plan to use are legitimate, confirmed, and published and go back to the 1990s. The information I found said to do the following Create an account, Get promoted to an autoconfirmed user, Create the page, Provide citations. Submit the page for review, Update it regularly. While these may not be your guidelines, my intentions are sincere and information is factual.

Steve.Slilaty (talk) 22:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm afraid the rules aren't so simple when you have a conflict of interest, or are being WP:PAID for your edits. You'll need to show you understand our rules on corporate editing if you wish to get unblocked. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 07:19, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sunshine Biopharma

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Sunshine Biopharma. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:22, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sunshine Biopharma has been accepted

Sunshine Biopharma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 02:47, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sunshine Biopharma

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Sunshine Biopharma. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Sumanuil (talk) 03:06, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]