User talk:Stephenhague

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page to follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons' policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring and sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, doing so will result your account or IP being blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Worm 11:59, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Faith Theological Seminary

Hi Stephen. I'm sure you've noticed that the article at Faith Theological Seminary has been changed back to it's old form again. I didn't actually create the entry myself, indeed my first change was to remove your edit. Let me explain why I've done this, I've linked to the relevant policies and guidelines for your convenience.

Text should not be copied directly from websites. Setting aside the copyright violations, the information does not conform to a neutral point of view. Neutrality is one of the fundamental values that the encyclopedia is based upon and promotional material will always show a clear bias. This means that anything copied across would have to be re-written in any case.
There is an issue with you editing the article in any case. Whilst it is not dis-allowed, any edits will be under further scrutiny due to your conflict of interest. I'm not saying it's necessarily a problem, but please be aware that you will have an automatic bias, which goes against the neutrality we aim to achieve.
Information on Wikipedia should be reliably sourced and verifiable. This means that Wikipedia should not contain any original content, it should all be accessible from third party sources which can be checked at any time.

I hope you can see that Wikipedia cannot and should not be used as a means of promotion or advertising. It is a collaborative environment and as such anyone can add or remove information from any article depending on the guidelines. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to leave me a message. Worm 10:28, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The edits constitute information about the history of the institution which I have followed and studied for many years. It is NOT advertisement, nor is there anything in the article that is biased. It is only factual information of people, dates, and places related to the formation and evolution of the institution. No one's personal opinions on that history are found here in the entry. Stephenhague (talk) 03:05, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Connection to Faith Theological Seminary?

Do you have a connection to Faith Theological Seminary? ElKevbo (talk) 00:33, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Stephenhague. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Stephenhague. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Stephenhague|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. ElKevbo (talk) 22:47, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have no financial gain to be made from the edits I made to this entry. They were made on my own initiative independently. It is of historical interest only to have an accurate account of the institution where I have taught. The information was confirmed by others who also know the history of the school and care about accuracy. This in itself does not constitute a conflict of interest, but rather demonstrates the greatest interest in preserving the historical record as accurately as possible. Stephenhague (talk) 02:59, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your username strongly suggests that you have a clear conflict of interest with this subject. Are you denying that you have a connection to the seminary?

Additionally, do you have a reliable source that supports the edit? I didn't see one referenced in your edit... ElKevbo (talk) 03:05, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you are employed by Faith Theological Seminary, then you are considered to be a paid editor by Wikipedia's definition. You do not have to be paid specifically to edit Wikipedia for this policy to apply. Therefore your disclosure of this information is mandatory, or you risk sanctions. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. ElKevbo (talk) 02:58, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since you continue to blatantly ignore multiple Wikipedia policies and our Terms of Service - namely WP:PAID, WP:COI, and WP:NPOV - I have opened another discussion at the noticeboard asking that you be blocked. ElKevbo (talk) 22:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ElKevbo (talk) 13:46, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Faith Theological Seminary) for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 14:16, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to edit the talk page, but if you are disruptive there you will face a broader block. Star Mississippi 14:19, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]