Jump to content

User talk:StellarHalo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Debate-style reference desk questions

[edit]

Hi StellarHalo. Many of your recent posts at the reference desks have bent or broken the rule against "requests for opinions, predictions or debate". Could you exert some additional care in filtering out questions that are more likely to results in opinion and debate than fact-based answers? Thanks, Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 02:23, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To add to the above, if you persist in spamming reference desks with more nonsense like this [1] I will be calling for you to be topic-banned from the reference desks. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:46, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@AndyTheGrump Ok then. Please try to enlighten me on how was that in any way nonsensical? Don't tell me you are triggered by a mere list of questions and background info? StellarHalo (talk) 20:05, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
My warning stands. I am not going to engage in debate with you. AndyTheGrump (talk) 20:21, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@AndyTheGrump So no evidence then. You are basically just casting aspersion on me. StellarHalo (talk) 20:45, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I would support a topic ban.-gadfium 19:57, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And I'll add to this that I'll happily impose a partial block from those pages if that pattern continues. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:42, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I was going to say the same thing, Fut. A topic ban would have to go via WP:AN or WP:ANI, thus wasting more of the time of editors who could be doing something better (added to the time StellarHalo is already wasting with point-making rhetorical questions). A simpler action would be to page-block SH from the Reference desk pages, which I am also prepared to do if the "debating" questions or other disruption continue. Bishonen | tålk 21:19, 29 October 2022 (UTC).[reply]
Hi StellarHalo. Since I last commented here, two of your reference desk questions have been at least borderline rule violations. There was this question, about the Israel-Palestine conflict and then this question, about both the I-P conflict (later struck) and ongoing sanctions against Russians. It's not impossible to ask a legitimate ref desk question about these sensitive topics, but I believe your questions were open-ended ones that naturally invite opinion and debate. The first did result in some acrimonious back-and-forth, and the second has users questioning the POV of your assumptions. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:23, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Which part of the first question was "acrimonious back-and-forth"? I asked about the legal basis and reasons for why the international community including the allies of Israel would choose to view the Israeli occupation of the West Bank as illegal, specifically if they have ever explained their reasoning and justification in any official declaration or if they have ever engaged with or debunked the position of Israel on the issue. Then, people tried to give answers, albeit none of which successfully answered my question. There was no debate on any of the facts I used as a context to the question.
For the most recent one, I was expecting people to know why "human rights" are called that and what they entail. It is not my fault if I specifically indicated the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and someone did not at least skim it before second guessing me. StellarHalo (talk) 20:52, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't say that any "part of the first question was 'acrimonious back-and-forth'", but that it was a result of the question. I don't think it's unreasonable to expect that a debate-style question about one of the most sensitive geopolitical topics of our time would lead to debate, some of it impolite. On the recent question, I don't care to engage in the debate with you. Are you taking no responsibility for the resulting debate? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 21:11, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
For the first question, what debate are you talking about? Which part of that conversation was acrimonious or impolite? I asked for info on the reasoning behind a long-held legal position of the international community and everyone else gave their two cents on what that might be. If you are referring to Mathglot's initial response, he just pointed out the obvious and then missed the fact that my questions were narrow and only concern a specific aspect of the topic. My response to AnonMoos' initial answer was due to the fact that it only addressed the positions of Arab states rather than the wider international community.
For the recent question, I should have realized that other people would have their own presumptions about human rights and privileges. I should have made more effort to assuage and mitigate any possible concern they might have. I take full responsibility for being inconsiderate and not sufficiently concise. StellarHalo (talk) 21:56, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
For the first question, I'm referring to AnonMoos's comments and the replies by Of 19 and Lambiam. Of 19's comment was then removed by Mathglot in this edit. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 22:03, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Green Line

[edit]

I don't know much about international relations but I suspect a big part of it is slippery slope. Like how they spent a lot of resources keeping His Royal Highness Napoleon I from escaping again instead of painlessly executing him. Never mind the implausibility of a similar thing happening to their country/head of state or the amount of deaths and trouble Napoleon/Palestinians caused, the idea of a people ~90-99% evicted from X in the past (no matter how severe, endless and un-karmic their persecution) evicting one that lives there now (no matter how uncompromising, asshole-y, and wiping out-y to the group above) makes countries nervous. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 05:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chaitanya Raj Singh (February 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Many of the sources used are not reliable and interviews are not independent.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 16:35, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, StellarHalo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 16:35, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 July 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Other British monarch requested move discussions currently taking place

[edit]

Since you recently participated in the Charles III requested move discussion, I thought you might like to know that there are two other discussions currently going on about other British monarch article titles here and here. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 22:27, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 August 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:39, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 August 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:18, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 August 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 September 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:37, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move discussion

[edit]

There is currently a Request Move discussion about William IV. Since you participated in the previous move discussion involving William IV, I thought you might want to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 19:29, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

article title

[edit]

Hi. I saw your move. I think it was first moved to exodus here without discussion. Do you think the original title should be restored? - Kevo327 (talk) 06:40, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Restore it to the "Flight" title if you want but the move to "Exodus" was not exactly controversial. Any controversial move has to be discussed in a move request and someone contested it in the talk page. StellarHalo (talk) 06:43, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 3 October 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:31, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 October 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:02, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 6 November 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:45, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 November 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:44, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 December 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:10, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 December 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:59, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 January 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 January 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:14, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Selfstudier (talk) 13:27, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 13 February 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:36, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 2 March 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:02, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 March 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:41, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1992 Buenos Aires Israeli embassy bombing - Edit Request

[edit]

I wonder if you might be able to review the Extended-confirmed-protected edit request I have made regarding your recent change to 1992 Buenos Aires Israeli embassy bombing#Responsibility? 2A00:23C6:EE8E:1:8475:7B78:39:629E (talk) 02:08, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 April 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 May 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:59, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 8 June 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:27, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 July 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 July 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 August 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:49, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 September 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:28, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 September 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:11, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 19 October 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:16, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 6 November 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 November 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:44, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:StellarHalo&oldid=1258296928"