User talk:Steelbird1967

This is Steelbird1967's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome

Hello, Steelbird1967, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 13:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siddharth Singh (Politician) (February 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Siddharth Singh (Politician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Steelbird1967! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 13:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Siddharth Singh (Politician)

Hello, Steelbird1967. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Siddharth Singh (Politician), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:04, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Siddharth Singh (Politician)

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Siddharth Singh (Politician) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:45, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Steelbird1967. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:45, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Steelbird1967, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:45, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yohan Poonawalla (September 6)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by TipsyElephant were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: The last AfD was this year and the consensus was to delete and salt: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yohan Poonawalla (2nd nomination)

TipsyElephant (talk) 21:07, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vaibhav Palhade (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Looking at the dates on the references, the similarities in tone and writing style, they fall under WP:NEWSORGINDIA and cannot be used to establish notability. If there is coverage out there that covers him more in-depth (I could not find any in a quick search), feel free to ping me here or leave a message on my talk page and I will come back to review. Given the history of the page creation, I would ask that you also review WP:COI and WP:PAID and make the appropriate disclosure if applicable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vaibhav Palhade and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 08:09, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vaibhav Palhade (April 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vaibhav Palhade and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:10, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Draft:Vaibhav Palhade, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 12:57, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok @Theroadislong can you guide me more where im wrong ? i read help to publish first article page according to that i did it. can you guide me is there any other way to understand the sources ? like which to keep and which to ignore ? or can i add tag {{connected contributor}}

im looking forward for your help in Guiding me to Start my wikipedia editing journey & can you help me to understand what mistakes i have done in Draft:Vaibhav Palhade Steelbird1967 (talk) 13:03, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislongplease reply me about above asked question Steelbird1967 (talk) 06:27, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Vaibhav Palhade has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vaibhav Palhade. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 06:31, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong Can you please explain what that means ? Steelbird1967 (talk) 07:27, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In order to qualify for an article Palhade needs to be notable, the relevant criteria can be found at WP:NWRITER, please read and then suggest how they pass. Theroadislong (talk) 07:32, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong I have added sources to early life as per your comment please check Draft:Vaibhav Palhade & let me know how to submit it again for review or already its in reviewing Steelbird1967 (talk) 10:03, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vaibhav Palhade (May 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Maliner was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vaibhav Palhade and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Maliner (talk) 14:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sir i dont feel they are just passing mentions,attached sources are all from Reputed Indian Media & Regional Indian Media i think it have to be review again by an Indian Editor who know all this medias and Understand Indian Language Steelbird1967 (talk) 16:18, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I saw where you were asking on IRC channel #wikipedia-en-help for more explanation about why reviewers are not agreeing with you about the sources you've used for the Palhade draft. I looked at each of them and I have to agree that they more resemble paid placements than independent reporting and in fact seem to stem from possibly just two publicity efforts, given the overlap in the topics and language used.

How do you overcome this problem? One possibility is to find news articles that can back up some of the claims made in these publicity pieces. Is there a professional review of his book Sajna Re? How about news articles that cover one or more of the many awards he has said to have received? Maybe this gives you an idea about other places to look for sources. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:02, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response.Im just Giving Up now,i have added COI tag as well.But no one is Discussing about it.Everyone is taking forward old mistakes like moving articles and that time i added small media sources.Anyway thank you for help @Jmcgnh@Maliner Steelbird1967 (talk) 05:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]