User talk:Stazzim
July 2017
[edit]
Your recent editing history at View, Inc. shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 18:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- You are on revert no.3, FYI. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 18:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Stazzim, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Stazzim! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC) |
No edit war
[edit]You and Bercawl must stop the edit war and try to reach an agreement with each other. Do not make too many changes for no reason and without specific references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jessehr (talk • contribs) 20:47, 20 July 2017 (UTC)