User talk:StattoSteven

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 (talk) 18:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing pattern is highly suspicious and your edits have been disruptive. Graham87 (talk) 18:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

StattoSteven (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please explain in detail why I have been blocked, and refer to guidelines I have broken. All I have done is add links to other wikipedia pages that interest me. I have read over all of the Wikipedia Guides eg. WP:DE ad have not found anything i did that was 'disruptive' or an 'abuse of editing privileges'. Thank you StattoSteven (talk) 15:32, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your link additions are dubious at best, and almost seem as if you are gaming the system to obtain advanced permissions. I also find the timing of your request curious; if I felt I had been wrongly blocked, I would have requested unblocking minutes after discovering it, not a few months later. 331dot (talk) 08:36, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

CU technical data is not helpful in this case. --Yamla (talk) 22:26, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

StattoSteven (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been busy during the summer and did not see that I had been blocked, not that it has any relevance to the basic edits I started making as I was learning how to use wikipedia. On what belief do you have that I was trying to game the system, surely I wouldn't wait this long to appeal the decision if that were the truth. StattoSteven (talk) 23:02, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you'd like to seek clarification on the block, it doesn't need to be in the form of an unblock request. I cannot unblock you at this time because you haven't addressed the primary issues with your editing, namely: highly suspicious editing pattern and disruptive edits. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 09:11, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblocked

You know, let's see what happens if I unblock you. Your earlier edits violated the overlinking guideline and I'm curious how you came to join WikiProjects and create a user page as your first edits (or even the veracity of what you wrote on your user page, but ... I'll give you one more chance. Graham87 (talk) 13:05, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't you think another admin should handle this user if there is further disruption? The community has lost a lot of trust in your blocking calls. 107.115.5.113 (talk) 00:56, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi StattoSteven! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

I noticed that you got in trouble before anybody could greet you here. Please read a bit before editing. As for linking to current countries: we don't do that, per WP:OVERLINK. I may have reverted one of your attempts. When you get reverted, please don't revert back or do the same thing again, - better try to find out why and find something better to do. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:37, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies and welcome

Hi StattoSteven and a belated welcome to Wikipedia. I want to apologise that you were treated so harshly and I hope you aren't too discouraged. Your block was imposed by an administrator who has unfortunately made several improper blocks and has now been reversed. If you have any questions about editing or Wikipedia in general please feel free to reach out at Wikipedia:Teahouse or my talkpage. AusLondonder (talk) 23:22, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]