User talk:Stash85

This user is a student editor in Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_California,_Los_Angeles_(UCLA)/Psychology_220A_(Fall,_2017).
Student assignments should always be carried out using a course page set up by the instructor. It is usually best to develop assignments in your sandbox. After evaluation, the additions may go on to become a Wikipedia article or be published in an existing article.

Welcome!

Hello, Stash85, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. ←} 22:10, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Stash85, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:30, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Dual Systems Model

Hello! Your submission of Dual Systems Model at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 01:17, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Dual systems model

On 31 December 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dual systems model, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the dual systems model seeks to explain why young people do stupid things? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Dual systems model), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review: Dual systems model

Hi, I left a message at the article's talkpage that may concern you. Please let me know if you're around or know of anyone who can help in the GA review. I'll be reviewing the article and the issues that may arise from the nomination will need to be addressed before it passes/fails. Thanks, MX (✉ • ✎) 20:32, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dual systems model

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dual systems model you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MX -- MX (talk) 21:41, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dual systems model

The article Dual systems model you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Dual systems model for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MX -- MX (talk) 20:42, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]