User talk:Starship9000/Archive (October 2012 - January 2013)

Welcome

Hello, Starship9000, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Astros4477 (talk) 23:20, 20 October 2012 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Space Spiral edits

Hello, I have noticed you keep changing some things in the Space Spiral article that I keep reverting. Please look at the page history to see why your edits have been reverted or changed. If you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page!--Astros4477 (talk) 01:59, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Starship9000, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Starship9000! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 02:16, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Phoenix (Busch Gardens Tampa Bay)

The article The Phoenix (Busch Gardens Tampa Bay) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The ride isn't notable enough for its own article. It is also unreferenced.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Astros4477 (talk) 02:20, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Abiah Jones

The article Abiah Jones has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Deceased subject notable for WP:ONEEVENT only. A tragedy, but lots of tragedies occur daily. Insufficient coverage outside the event newspaper stories.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BusterD (talk) 12:45, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Category:Places affected by Hurricane Sandy

Category:Places affected by Hurricane Sandy, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Dough4872 20:57, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

November 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to SpinSpider, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 04:40, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gator Bait (Six Flags New Orleans)

The article Gator Bait (Six Flags New Orleans) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability. Permanent stub. Unsourced.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 01:55, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Abiah Jones

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Abiah Jones requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Anbu121 (talk me) 14:07, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Ride notability

Please read WP:Notability. Rides such as Enterprises aren't notable because they're almost all the same and very few sources are available about them. If you ever have any questions, please leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, --Astros4477 (talk) 01:21, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Wheelie (ride) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wheelie (ride) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wheelie (ride) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Astros4477 (talk) 01:24, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Amusement rides introduced in 2013

A tag has been placed on Category:Amusement rides introduced in 2013, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• The category has been empty for four days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories. (See section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Themeparkgc  Talk  01:29, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Apple Turnover (Kings Dominion)

The article has been nominated for deletion, so the tag should not be removed, and the content of the article should not be removed unless it's being improved. You can participate in the deletion discussion that is ongoing here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apple Turnover (Kings Dominion). ... discospinster _talk 18:05, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

As an addendum I cannot delete this article for you. As it was nominated for deletion rather than speedy deletion it is up to the community to decide on its fate. They seem to think it is a good article! Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 19:12, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Apple Turnover

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Template:Apple Turnover, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Themeparkgc  Talk  08:22, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Abiah Jones

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Abiah Jones requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Vacation^nine 02:04, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

December 2012

Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, SpinSpider, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 01:50, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Merry Christmas to you too!

Astros4477 (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

--Astros4477 (talk) 18:43, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gretchen Banks

Hello Starship9000,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gretchen Banks for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Cdtew (talk) 23:28, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to SpinSpider, without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 04:41, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from SpinSpider. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 04:42, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rui (Colosseum)

Hello Starship9000,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Rui (Colosseum) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Mabalu (talk) 01:39, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion

Hi, and merry Christmas! Regarding speedy deletion, this can be done via Wikipedia:Twinkle, or via the Special:NewPagesFeed using WP:CURATE. Make sure you understand how the processes work before jumping in, as inappropriate use of these tools may lead to editing privileges being limited. hope this helps, all best, Mabalu (talk) 03:35, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

PROD-related categories

Hi, Category:All articles proposed for deletion is automatically included if a PROD template is placed on an article and should not be added by hand, because that screws up things if an article is de-PRODded. Also, I saw that you created Category:Proposed deletion as of 28 December 2012. That is not necessary either, because these cats are created automatically by bots. Happy editing! --Randykitty (talk) 11:58, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

• it is already speedy deleted from Wikipedia.

--Starship9000 (talk) 17:18, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of SpinSpider

The article SpinSpider has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, no independent sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 12:11, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

• Hi, I'm not sure I understand your message. If you want this article to stay on Wikipedia, then the way to do that is not letting the PROD message stay (or remove it, because I'll take it to AfD then), but to add reliable sources to the article that have an in-depth discussion of the subject. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 16:24, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Category:Former statues

Category:Former statues, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 12:20, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Please do not empty categories out of process. If you want the category deleted, please respond in the discussion. Mangoe (talk) 17:40, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

About Rosemary Sorensen

Hi Starship9000! I would suggest you reconsider the WP:BLPPROD: The Australian is quite a reliable reference. --Shirt58 (talk) 23:40, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Deleting talk pages

Hi, usually a talk page is deleted along with a deleted main article page. Sometimes the talk page gets left behind by accident, in which case you can nominate it for speedy deletion as a talk page without an associated article. Hope this helps. Mabalu (talk) 00:20, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Not signing posts

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. I know you're putting your name at the end of messages, but do what it says above so the time and date is added too. Astros4477 (talk) 00:31, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Headley Whitney Museum

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Headley Whitney Museum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Astros4477 (talk) 00:34, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Headley Whitney Museum

If an article is up for Speedy Deletion, there's no point in putting a PROD template because it'll be deleted very fast.--Astros4477 (talk) 04:30, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Stars

Just to let you know, I removed two of your prods, on 7 Piscium and 48 Persei. As stars visible to the naked eye, both pass WP:NASTRO #1 (and probably #4), and in addition there have been several research papers published specifically about 48 Persei, so it also passes #3. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:44, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Phenac City

The article Phenac City has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable fictitious city. No independent sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 10:00, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Black out (pokemon)

The article Black out (pokemon) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a how-to guide

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheLongTone (talk) 16:17, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gorigan

Hello Starship9000,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gorigan for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Mabalu (talk) 16:24, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:55, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Moonwalker (ride)

Hello Starship9000,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Moonwalker (ride) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks,  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 20:22, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mud Slap (pokemon move)

Hello, Starship9000. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Mud Slap (pokemon move), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks,  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 20:25, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Starship9000. You have new messages at Astros4477's talk page.
Message added 20:25, 26 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Astros4477 (talk) 20:25, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Berserker (Kings Dominion)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Berserker (Kings Dominion) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Randykitty (talk) 16:29, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dr. Kaminko

The article Dr. Kaminko has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Apparently a minor character in a video game; not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PKT(alk) 19:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Notable Rides

(talk page stalker)I was leaving a message on Astros4477 talk page and I saw your message that I thought that I might as well reply to. Yes there is, such as WindSeeker that doesn't work yet are at several Cedar Fair parks that have them which makes in notable. The trouble that Cedar Fair has been going through with the ride over the past 2 years also makes it notabel.

p.s When leaving a message on someone's talk page, at the end of it, click the signature button beside the italics button so a bot doesn't have to make an ugly one for you.--Dom497 (talk) 20:44, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Starship9000. You have new messages at Dom497's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I created the article Shake (ride) so do you think this fairground ride is notable enough or do you think I should put PROD on it. Please look at it. --74.131.177.233 (talk) 20:27, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 2 level 2 goals

The article List of Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 2 level 2 goals has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stub article that lacks notability and references.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Astros4477 (talk) 21:58, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Starship9000. You have new messages at Astros4477's talk page.
Message added 21:59, 28 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Astros4477 (talk) 21:59, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

I left one more message.--Astros4477 (talk) 22:13, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gretchen G Bank

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gretchen G Bank requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 17:03, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I'm CherryX. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Standing but not operating, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, CherryX (talk) 00:08, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. Kaminko

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dr. Kaminko requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Starship9000 (talk) 00:38, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Apple Turnover (Kings Dominion) speedy deletion nomination

Please stop nominating this redirect for speedy deletion. The redirect is a valid search term and needs to stay in place to provide attribution for the merged content. If you really think the redirect needs to be deleted, there is only one venue that it can be deleted through, WP:Redirects for discussion. GB fan 15:11, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sky Slide

The article Sky Slide has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable amusement ride. It could be seen in the Defunct rides section of the Former Cedar Point attractions. Unintelligible. Stub and no reference.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Starship9000 (talk) 15:13, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

how to remove the orphan tag

Hi. You already correctly removed the tag in your edit. --Meno25 (talk) 20:13, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Happy New Year

File:Happy New Year 2013.jpg		Have an enjoyable New Year!
		Hello, Starship9000. Thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, — ξxplicit 23:08, 31 December 2012 (UTC) Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2013}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:37, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 59 Persei

The article 59 Persei has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Starship9000 (talk) 00:30, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Manimala Girls High School

This article has now been prodded three times, twice by you. Please read WP:PROD. Once deprodded, an article should not be prodded again. Take to WP:AfD if you want it deleted (although I suspect I know what the result will be!). -- Necrothesp (talk) 22:41, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

And please read WP:BLPPROD before wasting everyone's time. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 10:37, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Yukon Yahoo

The article Yukon Yahoo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stub article that lacks references and notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Astros4477 (talk) 23:00, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Apple Turnover (Kings Dominion)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Apple Turnover (Kings Dominion) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Starship9000 (talk) 23:34, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

I will not tell you again, if you want Apple Turnover (Kings Dominion) deleted you have to take it to WP:RFD. If you nominate it again using any other process I will block you. GB fan 00:06, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

• I took it to RFD.

--Starship9000 (talk) 20:21, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Apple Turnover (Kings Dominion) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Apple Turnover (Kings Dominion). Since you had some involvement with the Apple Turnover (Kings Dominion) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Starship9000 (talk) 00:44, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Wacky Wheel listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wacky Wheel. Since you had some involvement with the Wacky Wheel redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Starship9000 (talk) 00:47, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Yukon Yahoo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yukon Yahoo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yukon Yahoo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Astros4477 (talk) 05:01, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tiger (Dolphin)

The article Tiger (Dolphin) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable dolphin.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Starship9000 (talk) 00:54, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Tiger (Dolphin) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tiger (Dolphin) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiger (Dolphin) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TBrandley ^{(what's up)} 00:56, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Gator Bait (Six Flags New Orleans) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gator Bait (Six Flags New Orleans). Since you had some involvement with the Gator Bait (Six Flags New Orleans) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Starship9000 (talk) 01:04, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tiger (Dolphin)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tiger (Dolphin) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Intelligentsium 01:14, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Recent deletions

Hi. I noticed a lot of articles you've recently created qualified for speedy deletion. You might want to review the page I linked (as well as the notability page) because it seems you might not understand what exactly is admissible as a Wikipedia page and what is not - generally only things that exhibit significant coverage in secondary sources (meaning a lot of reliable sources about the topic) can become articles. If you have any questions, feel free to let me know on my talk page. Cheers, Intelligentsium 01:20, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zyklon (roller coaster)

The article Zyklon (roller coaster) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough information for defunct roller coaster.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Astros4477 (talk) 17:38, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

If this article is about a specific Zyklon then it should be titled Zyklon (Morey's Piers). Pinfari made at least 50 Zyklons in various sizes and at least 19 of them kept them name Zyklon at their respective park. This entry, as it is titled now, could refer to any one of them.JlACEer (talk) 16:55, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Arthur Looff

The article Arthur Looff has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable roller coaster manufacturer.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Starship9000 (talk) 19:54, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

• Why did you create this article and then on your 5th edit to the article propose it be deleted? You are wasting people's time by creating articles and then immediately asking that they be deleted. GB fan 01:20, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

AfCs and speedy

You tagged Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bluegrass Fair for speedy as the talk p. of a non-existent page. Actually, all AfC articles are created in WP talk space. I know it's weird; it's a limitation of the crude way that function was programmed. (That particular article is of course not yet acceptable, but it seems just incomplete--I will advise the author) DGG ( talk ) 20:04, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

• The author is 74.131.177.233.

--Starship9000 (talk) 20:11, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Morey's Piers, without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 94.196.0.103 (talk) 21:51, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Looping Starship. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SummerPhD (talk) 23:57, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

• Okay. I will stop doing it. --Starship9000 (talk) 02:29, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vertigorama (roller coaster)

The article Vertigorama (roller coaster) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable SBNO roller coaster.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Starship9000 (talk) 17:55, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zyklon (Morey's Piers)

The article Zyklon (Morey's Piers) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable: Lacks substantial coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 18:19, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shake (ride)

The article Shake (ride) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable: Lacks substantial coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 18:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Zyklon (Morey's Piers) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zyklon (Morey's Piers) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zyklon (Morey's Piers) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GB fan 22:53, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Willy Blok Hanson

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Willy Blok Hanson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. PKT(alk) 23:29, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

your question

Please not ask me questions on my main talk p.; the archive p. for January is where i will move questions and comments I get asked about during january after dealing with them.

You ask me how to delete a afc page. I assume you mean how to delete a page you created, and then decided not to work on further, because the reviewer's comments convinced you that it was not going to be accepted despite further editing, or because you realized that yourself, or because you just made an error in starting it.

the way to do it is to add at the top of the page the line

{{db-author}}

It will then be deleted in a few hours. This is also true for any article you start in mainspace. DGG ( talk ) 22:19, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

WP:PROD tagging

Hi Starship9000!
I can see you've recently adding WP:PROD tags to a few articles. It's great that you want to clean up Wikipedia by removing articles that shouldn't be there. But... Chestnut Mound, Tennessee is a populated place, Saccharomyces mikatae is a living organism... those aren't articles that are going to be deleted. Would you like some help with this?
--Shirt58 (talk) 02:45, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

but i dont know about them. --Starship9000 (talk) 03:24, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

What has whether you've heard about them have to do with anything? Please, stop tagging articles for deletion until you've had a chance to work with Shirt or another editor to learn more about our policies. What you are doing is problematic. LadyofShalott 04:10, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tallahatchie Bridge

The article Tallahatchie Bridge has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable bridge.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Starship9000 (talk) 03:32, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

PROD of 55 Pegasi

Hey there, I saw that you PRODded this article. Well, the article meets our set of guidelines at WP:NASTRO, and there's no ambiguity whatsoever. In the future, when PRODing articles related to astronomy, please check our notability guidelines first to see if the meets then. In short, if it is visible to the naked eye, such as 55 Pegasi, it is inherently notable. StringTheory11 (t • c) 03:39, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

• Starship, here's the deal--I'm placing it in this section since I just had a look at that star, with my naked eye. You make one more such proposal for deletion, a proposal so absurd at first glance already, and you'll be blocked: your actions could conceivably be well-intentioned, but they are seriously disruptive. In fact, taking the whole of your talk page and contributions into account, your creation of articles on non-notable subjects and your prodding on obviously notable ones, I have serious doubts whether you are competent to edit this project in the first place. Drmies (talk) 05:39, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ten question marks

The article Ten question marks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Ten question marks – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:32, 12 January 2013 (UTC)w

Proposed deletion of Mach 5 (water slide)

The article Mach 5 (water slide) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stub article that lacks references. A water slide complex is not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Astros4477 (talk) 05:05, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Jean Martianay, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage newer editors. Please read Wikipedia:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. And this is another example of what I can only call incompetence. Of course these edits a. were not vandalism and b. improved the article. Drmies (talk) 05:42, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

STOP

Okay, Starship, you need to take a break in general. I've deleted the page you made about the glitch Pokemon, as it was a copyright violation of Bulbapedia. Bulbapedia's license is incompatible with ours, so we can't take material directly copied from there, and we certainly can't take material copied from anywhere if you don't say where you're copying it from. The PROD tags are a problem as well, as others have told you. Seriously, take a break; I don't want to block you, but I will if that's what it takes. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 05:43, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Starship9000: please read what Writ Keeper wrote. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia on the internet. It's a "reference work", something you could look up for facts, like a dictionary or an atlas.
Think about what might be in your school books in Junior High? Is a glitch Pokemon species going to be there? --Shirt58 (talk) 13:50, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

I will stop writing about that glitch pokemon. And no that pokemon is not going on wikipedia. --Starship9000 (talk) 15:36, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

• Having seen the sheer number of things you've created that have been deleted, issues with your PRODing, and various other issues, I suggest you either take Writ Keeper's advice about a break, or at the very least, read the relevant guidelines before you make any further edits. Lukeno94 (talk) 19:48, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which Starship9000 is involved. Thank you.

• OK--that discussion, I will close it imminently. And I am going to block you for 24 hours since after you made the above comment (which doesn't even begin to address the many problems pointed out by a multitude of editors), you made this edit], in which, on a Wikipedia project page, you removed a bridge article needing attention from a list of bridge articles needing attention. I'm blocking you to a. prevent further damage in the next 24 hours and b. to give you some time to ponder over these many comments on your talk page and read up on Wikipedia's guidelines. Sorry, but that's the way it is: you are not helping the cause. Drmies (talk) 20:12, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Drmies (talk) 20:15, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sock puppetry. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Starship9000 for details and instructions on how to respond. (If you wish to respond during your block, please post your response here and it will be copied to the sock investigation as needed.) - SummerPhD (talk) 05:54, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

This case has been closed. While you do not need to do anything, you can still look at the discussion if you would like. Please see my comments for you at User_talk:Starship9000#Suggestions. Thanks. - SummerPhD (talk) 17:31, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Shake (ride) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shake (ride) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shake (ride) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SummerPhD (talk) 05:56, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Central Park Carousel

The article Central Park Carousel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced with no indication of notabilty.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 06:01, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

This was a very bad prod. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:58, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or sock puppetry.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Andrew³²⁷ 06:54, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Suggestions

Editing while logged out at some times and logged in at others makes it look like you are more than one person. Please try not to do this accidentally. Doing this on purpose or trying to look like more than one person during a content dispute is not allowed. Please be sure to log in every time you edit. (Using the "stay logged in" feature may be helpful.)

To avoid some of the problems you have been having, you might want to sign up for help at Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user. Thanks! - SummerPhD (talk) 17:26, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Please remember to log in with your user name when you want to edit. You continue to edit with an IP. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:22, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Giving your IP number (74.131.177.233) falafel is deceptive, since these are not two people, they are both you. Please stop. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:26, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Another friendly reminder to log in when you edit so you make sure that you don't make edits from your IP address, as you did here. Andrew³²⁷ 01:30, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Deletion discussion for Ukrainians in Italy

You previously nominated Ukrainians in Italy for speedy deletion, which was rejected. I created an entry for the article at Articles for Deletion and you are invited to give your feedback. Generally speaking, Articles for Deletion is a good place to learn the ins and outs of Wikipedia, and there is no seniority requirement for joining. Andrew³²⁷ 01:50, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Drmies (talk) 05:35, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

• And you did it again. Your PROD of Neven filipović grčić was incorrect: we don't PROD if something isn't in English (a BLP PROD, since it's an unverified BLP, is valid, but that's not what you did), and your PROD of 1776 in philosophy clearly didn't have a leg to stand on. Blocked for 72 hours; the next block will probably be indefinite. Time to start conversing with other editors on your talk page. Drmies (talk) 05:37, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

• Starship, I have been reviewing your contributions and see that you have only made around 300 edits to articles. I'm sure you believe you are helping Wikipedia in the best of intentions, but unfortunately you are getting things wrong too often and causing us a lot more work. We don't really want to have to block you again for anything, so when your current block expires, please be sure to read WP:Guidance for younger editors and consider applying for mentorship at WP:Adopt.

Please create any new articles in your sandbox first before moving them to article space. Please also stop patrolling any more pages and listing them for deletion until you have significantly more experience (over 1,000 mainspace edits) and read and thoroughly understood the instructions at WP:NPP and WP:Deletion.

If you need help with anything, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:16, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

{{Unblock on hold | 1=Drmies | 2=I will remember that if I see a page not written in english, i will request speedy deletion and I stop doing disruptive editing.[[User:Starship9000|Starship9000]] ([[User talk:Starship9000#top|talk]]) 8:03 am, Today (UTC+7) | 3=You must agree to the conditions of your unblock.: Stop patrolling and tagging new pages until you have 1,000 mainspace edits, and create all new articles in your user space first. [[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 05:50, 15 January 2013 (UTC)}}

• Starship, those are not the conditions Kudpung set for an unblock. These conditions are quite clear, and they are a minimum before I would agree to an unblock. In fact, what you're saying is exactly incorrect: if you see a page not written in English, you will not request speedy deletion. That's part of the unblock conditions, not the whole of it. And I continue to doubt that you know how your contributions were disruptive--not just the deletion requests, but some other edits as well. Drmies (talk) 17:38, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

• What should I do if I see a page written in a different language but not english? ==Starship9000 (talk) 21:37, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Well, there's a place on Wikipedia to request translation into English here. If and only if the foreign-language article is identical to an existing article on a foreign language Wikipedia (the German Wikipedia, for example), you can tag it for speedy deletion under A2, but again, that's only if it's in a foreign language and identical to another article on another Wikipedia. Otherwise, follow the instructions at Pages needing translation that I linked earlier to request a translation into English. If the request goes unanswered for two weeks or more, then you can nominate it for deletion, but not before. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 21:51, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Starship9000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I will not do disruptive editing. Starship9000 (talk) 21:39, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

(Mostly) procedural decline; your first unblock is still active (although it's on hold) above, and it's best to stick with only one unblock active at a time. As an aside, you still haven't made a very convincing argument that you understand why your editing is disruptive; in other words, you haven't described what things you're going to now avoid that will keep your editing from becoming disruptive. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 21:43, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Grzegorz Skawiński

Is now a good ? Pleonazm9082 (talk) 08:46, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

It looks perfect then it used to look when I proposed it for deletion for a unsourced BLP but now it looks perfect. ==Starship9000 (talk) 21:41, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Do you have any ideas for new articles?

If you do, let me know by responding below this message. I've created a number of articles and I'd be happy to help you develop your ideas and find good sources before publishing them on Wikipedia. Andrew³²⁷ 17:07, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Unblock requests

Hi Starship. You have still not understood the conditions for your unblock. This leads me to think that either English is not your main language, or that you are still in Primary/Elementary school and your reading skills are not yet perfect, but I apologise if I'm wrong on either count - I can only guess.

Just so you know what you must and must not do when your current block expires, here it is again:

1. You will not patrol or tag any new pages or other pages until you have made at least 1,000 edits to articles.
2. You will create any new articles in your Sandbox first and ask an established user to review it before it is moved to Mainspace.

Additionally you are strongly advised to go on a mentoring programme at WP:Adopt where you will learn all the ins and outs of editing. Please understand that if you don't follow these conditions, to prevent you from disrupting the Wikipedia any admin can block you again without warning and for a much longer time. I hope you understand, and if not, you are welcome to ask me any questions on my talk page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:03, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) If you are interested in being adopted (which is highly recommended), simply copy and past the following text onto your user page and an experienced editor will stop by and help you: {{Adoptme}}

Andrew³²⁷ 06:18, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Kudpung, I got what I need to do when I am unblocked and I made 816 edits so is that good enough or I need more edits? Starship9000 (talk) 01:18, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Kudpung was referring to article edits, of which you have only 300+ right now. He's saying that if he unblocks you, you can't patrol new pages etc. until after you have at least 1,000 article edits. I presume he's making this condition so that you will concentrate on article edits and by doing that learn more about what goes into making an article, and what is and isn't acceptable - so you don't continue to make the same kinds of mistakes you've been making up to now. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:26, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Does that mean I can not propose articles for deletion? And once my block expires, am I allowed to create a article then put it on the sandbox or only create it on the sandbox?--Starship9000 (talk) 13:21, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Yes, now that your block has expired, please do not propose articles for deletion, and please only create articles in the sandbox. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 14:10, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Writ Keeper, do I only propose articles for deletion when I make it to 1,000 edits? My block expired today. --Starship9000 (talk) 22:42, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Recap

Starship, although it's been explained to you several times, you seem to be having difficulty understanding. I appreciate that it is probably because you are still only in 7th Grade, so because we want to encourgage very young users to contribute - and get it right - I'll repeat again what we have asked you to do:

1. Do not patrol and tag any new pages for anything until you have made at least 1,000 edits to Wikipedia articles. This does not include minor spelling or punctuation corrections, etc. It does not include edits to your user pages, dab pages, redirects, or other discussion pages or AfD.
2. Create any new articles in your sandbox first, then ask an admin to review it before it is moved to article space.

I'm sure you will understand why we have had to impose these conditions - all we're doing is trying to help you, so if you're not sure of anything, drop in at the the Teahouse (see above) where a bunch of experienced editors are always ready to help newcomers and you are also welcome to ask me for advice on my talk page. To know how many edits you have made to different parts of the Wikipedia, click here. Good luck, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:07, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Kudpong, does that means that I can't particapate in articles for deletion? --Starship9000 (talk) 02:42, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

I think it's best that you stay away from all management areas util you have 1,000 edits constructively improving and expanding articles. That means that you do not place 'orphan' tags on articles - in fact you don't put any tags on any articles at all. This shouldn't be so difficult to understand. It's a condition of you staying unblocked. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:19, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Disruptive edits?

Starship, please stop making disruptive edits to pages. You are back to the same old nonsense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julser1 (talk • contribs) 03:53, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Julser: Can you please provide diffs? I've looked through S9000's recent edits and I'm not sure what you're referring to. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:01, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

I've also collapsed your AN/I report as being premature. Please wait for a response from S9000, and please provide specifics about what you consider to be "disruptive". Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:22, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Well, as far as I can see, Julser undid one "vandalism" edit that was actually anything but[1] and another thing that was also not vandalism[2]. Julser, you are too inexperienced to be making these sorts of calls - especially with your limited history being not so rosy. Lukeno94 (talk) 10:07, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Alright, I will stop disruptive edits. --Starship9000 (talk) 14:11, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Adoption offer

Starship9000, I see that above some of Wikipedia's most respected administrators as well as some other great users have strongly suggested you seek adoption. I am here to offer to admit you to my adoption school, where you complete a series of lessons and tests before a final exam that will give you a working knowledge of the encyclopedia as a whole as well as its policy. If you would be interested in taking me up on this offer, please reply here, and I will set up a personal classroom for you. Respectfully, Go Phightins! 16:53, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Bridges

Just go there and add yourself to the list of project members. You don't really need an invite. Daniel Case (talk) 17:13, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Ok, I will do that. --Starship9000 (talk) 17:21, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Your sandbox draft of Flint Covered Bridge

Hi Starship, I see you've submitted this article at AfC. It really is not ready. You hav not said where the bridge is (you list road names with no context at all), and have put it in a Vermont category, but without any text saying it is in Vermont). You also cite no sources at all. More minor issues include that you have not bolded the article name the first time it's used in the text, and you don't have any wikilinks to other articles. I'm pretty sure there is an infobox for brdiges you could also include to help both the reader and to guide you in what else to add to the article. LadyofShalott 17:45, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Should a editor request the sandbox page about the Flint Covered Bridge in Vermont for deletion or should we improve it more? --Starship9000 (talk) 21:06, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

I think you should improve it more, starting with LadyofShalott's suggestions. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:14, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

LadyofShalott, I actually improved the article User:Starship9000/sandbox that has information about the Flint Covered Bridge which does not have a article yet. I added vermont related category's as well as infoboxes on the bridge and NHRP for the bridge. Please do check the sandbox to see if its good or not. If it is, then should I resend it to Articles for Creation. If its not, then I will improve it. (AFC)?--Starship9000 (talk) 01:22, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Do you have a source for the information? You can check out Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for information on how to add it to the article or ask help from any of us here. Ryan Vesey 01:28, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

No, I do not have a reference on it. I am getting ready to add one to the article then we need to check if it actually is more improved. If yes, then we should resend it to articles for creation. If no, tehn I will improve it more until it meets the wikipedia notability. --Starship9000 (talk) 01:31, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

I made some improvements to the article, and although it would benefit greatly from being expanded, it will be ready for the mainspace as soon as we can get citations for the content. Ryan Vesey 01:33, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Ryan Vesey. I think you should go resend it to articles for creation that way we should create the article Flint Covered Bridge. I think it should be requested again for AFC. Thanks. --Starship9000 (talk) 01:36, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

I'll recreate it as soon as you can get a source for the information. I'm looking for a free image right now. Question, did you get any information from this site? Your text was very close to the text of the site. We need to be very careful not to write anything on Wikipedia that is too much like the sources, otherwise you can get in trouble for copyright infringement. It's good now, and it's possible that it was a coincidence, but I'm just letting you know. Ryan Vesey 01:40, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

I putted a reference for it. And how I got the information about the bridge is that I looked up facts about the Flint Cvoered Bridge on

www.Bridgehunter.com|Flint Covered Bridge.com. I might put a picture of the bridge on the page today. And I will be careful about the part were you told me about the copyright infringement. What do you think I should do after I put the image for the bridge? Thanks.

Hey Starship, I found an image somebody had uploaded and I found a good NRHP source that gave some information on the bridge and the date it was listed and I added that to the article. I moved it to Flint Covered Bridge for you. Ryan Vesey 02:01, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Ryan Vesey. --Starship9000 (talk) 02:16, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

The article as is stands is good. Starship, if you can aim for at least that quality as you create your articles, you'll be in good shape. Remember that providing references for your material is a key component of creating a decent article. :) LadyofShalott 06:27, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I might create a amusement park ride or roller coaster article in the sandbox. I might create the page List of Drievliet attractions and List of Kings Island attractions. --Starship9000 (talk) 14:19, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Notable rides

As a friendly talk-page stalker of Astros4477, I wanted to offer some assistance in response to your question on his talk page. A very good example of a notable ride is the Windseeker's rival attraction, the SkyScreamer at Six Flags theme parks around the country. Then there's flat rides like the Enterprise, Frisbee, Top Spin and Scrambler. Are you wanting to prepare an article about a particular model of ride, or about a specific installation of one? If it's the former, be bold and have at it. If it's the latter (for example, an article about the Windseeker found at Cedar Point), you would need to provide information from reliable sources indicating why that particular installation is notable enough for its own article. If you have other questions or comments, please feel free to leave them here or on my talk page. Good luck! --McDoobAU93 18:30, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

I don't think having 6 WindSeeker articles is a good idea. They're all at Cedar Fair and are fine in one nice article.--Dom497 (talk) 21:20, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013 edits

I know you mean well, but unfortunately, a number of your recent edits, including this one and this one, have added uncited information into the articles. More specifically, it appears to be original analysis on your part, something that Wikipedia also discourages. We cannot make deductions or statements based on our own interpretations of what is already out there. Put another way, instead of one of us saying that Flight Deck is the only suspended coaster at Kings Island, we would need a reliable source making that same statement; then it would be allowed. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to ask. --McDoobAU93 20:31, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Starship9000. You have new messages at Dom497's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Dom497 (talk) 00:42, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Roller Coaster GA's

There is no simple way to describe how to get a roller coaster article to Good Article status so please don't get intimidated by how long this message is.

For the sake of explaining, I am going to use Intimidator (roller coaster) which is one of my GA's. Though this article is complete it's easier to explain how I got to a state rather then how to get there. The first thing you should ask yourself is what the article must have:

• A history section
• A ride experience section
• Depending if the ride has won any awards, an award section
• A lead

History: This section should obviously have some history about the coaster. The first thing should be what happened before the roller coaster was announced. Where any attractions removed/moved to make room for the coaster? Did the park launch teaser's to build hype for the announcement? If this info is available, then it should be included. However, if there is a coaster that you know the park had teasers but you can't find any sources, LEAVE IT OUT! Next comes the announcement. This only has to be one sentence but if you can find sources that describe how the ride was announced, who announced it, etc then include it. To find when the ride was announced, you can go to the coaster's RCDB page. For Intimidator, its page is here. At the top of the page there are 3 tabs. One of them say press releases which will lead to the press release with a date. In the article, a basic sentence would say something along the lines of, "Intimidator was announced to the public on August 26, 2009. Next comes construction. When did construction begin/end? When was the lift hill completed? When was the layout completed? These are all the things that you should try to find. Typically, this may require you to search quite a bit. If you are working on an older roller coaster it will be likely that you can't find any reliable construction sources which will mean you will have to leave it out. However, you can probably go to the parks website, copy the url, and go to [Way Back Machine] and see if you find anything in the archives (sometimes this will work and sometimes is won't). After construction, the final sentence should be when the attraction opened, "After construction and testing was completed, Intimidator opened on March 27, 2010". If you find a source that mentiones that ride soft-opened (opening for a limited time before officially opening), then you should put, "...Intimidator soft-opened on ____ before officially opening on March 27, 2010". Now, if there is any additional info that doesn't fall under construction, announcement, or opening, in a new paragraph or sub-section, you should put that info. For example, in the Intimidator article there was a first rider auction. I'm not going to explain what to put in that section as it is right in the Intimidator article.

Ride experience: This section should be divided into 3 parts; a description on what riding the coaster is like (pretty much searching a POV of the coaster on youtube and translating the video into words), Trains (How many trains does the coaster have? How many cars does one train have? How many seats does one car have? How many riders can one train hold? Also, if there is any other info you think should be included and can be sourced about the trains such as if the trains are themed as anything you may wish to add it), and Track (How long is the track? How high is the lift? What is the angle of the first drop? What type of braking does the coaster use (only include if you can find at least one reliable source)? What colour is the track/rails/supports?).

Awards: This will take some time to do. The Golden Ticket Awards and Mitch Hawker's Best Roller Coaster Poll are the best places to look. For the GTA, you will have to manually search through the magazine to find if the coaster won anything. Links to the magazine can be found here (ref numbers 18 - 30). In that article, ref #31 leads to results for the Mitch Hawker's awards. If the roller coaster indeed has won awards, it should be included in the article in a form of a table.

Lead: Leads will vary from article to article so just take a look at other articles to get an idea of what to write for that part (The lead is like the intro to the article, it can be found in every article at the very top (first paragraph)).

Pictures: Photos are great to have, but optional. You should first look at Wikipedia Commons for any pictures and Flickr as those are good places to find photos (be careful with flickr as only a few pictures can be used on Wikipedia because of licensing).

This is a basic guideline and in no way guarantees that the article will be promoted

If you have any other questions please leave a message on my talkpage.--Dom497 (talk) 19:40, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Unblock conditions

Hi Starship. You still only hvae 370 edits to articles and it will take time to make more, so please do not be in a hurry - you still have a lot to learn. From questions you are asking on my talk page and the talk pages of other users, I'm still not sure that you have fully understood the conditions for remaining unblocked. So here they are again: You do not patrol or tag pages for anything at all until you have made at least 1,000 edits to articles. This 1,000 is a minimum and may be more depending on the circumstances. The 1,000 edits will not include edits of yours that have been reverted or that are problematic such as needing references. Please also consider GoPhiting's offer to teach you how to edit Wikipedia because now that someone has offered to mentor you, there is no excuse for you to make any mistakes. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:27, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

I understand now. I did not propose any articles for deletion. I will go remove twinkle of my gadgets right now. Thanks for telling me.that. I understand Kudpung so thanks for telling me the goals to stay unblocked. I have also been creating articles in my sandbox page as well as creating draft articles that looks like this: User:Starship9000/Flint Covered Bridge. I might create more amusement park and bridge related draft articles. Thanks. --Starship9000 (talk) 23:34, 26 January 2013 (UTC)