User talk:Starship.paint/Archive 9

Archive 5

←

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

Archive 11

→

Archive 15

User:Miss X-Factor/Veda Scott

Hi. I managed to get the recently deleted version of Veda Scott transferred to my original version of Veda Scott. So if you would like to edit or add any information, please feel free to anytime! I look forward to making this page become a fantastic article. --Miss X-Factor (talk) 22:40, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Miss X-Factor - I'm not planning to edit that in the near future, sorry. Firstly my editing levels will drop very soon and I have other projects to do. Secondly, I won't edit unless she passes WP:GNG, in the sense that she needs to have a level of success, I established some criteria in my post on 08:18, 7 August 2014 (UTC) at the deletion page. Or, as the deleting admin said, once there is a single article addressing Scott directly from a reliable source. Otherwise, when the article is recreated, it will just be deleted again. I hope you understand. starship.paint ~ regal 06:28, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Starship.paint. You have new messages at LM2000's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Money in the Bank (2011)

Thanks for taking up the offer Baffle gab1978. I'll take a look at all the changes once you're done. starship.paint ~ regal 04:51, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks again Baffle gab1978. Unfortunately I'm quite busy at this time. I'll give you a shout out to discuss the changes when I get back! starship.paint ~ regal 13:52, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Gamergate controversy

Do not falsify the content of sources. Your most recent edit to the page completely and intentionally misconstrues a statement made by the author in the source cited. The Forbes page says, and I quote, "#GamerGate isn’t about conspiracies. It isn’t about scandal and corruption. It isn’t about feminists or misogynists. It isn’t about any of these things, and it’s about all of them all at once." You completely changed the meaning of his statement, a final sentence in a massive article he wrote, to promote the exact opposite of what he's describing. If I catch you doing this again, I will report you.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 23:14, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

• Ryulong - please assume good faith. I am not an IP or a new editor. Your combativeness is off-putting. Report me if you wish, my conscience is clean. Also, I don't appreciate being lumped as part of you three, this is not a "US VS THEM" battleground. starship.paint ~ regal 02:12, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

IPBE

Hi Starship.paint, just to let you know, I've removed IP Block Exemption as none of your underlying IP addresses are blocked. PhilKnight (talk) 21:02, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

PhilKnight - that's fine, just hoping nobody with my IP is blocked in the future! starship.paint ~ regal 08:03, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notification - BLP

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

• Referring specifically to Gamergate controversy and related articles and edits, but note this this alert applies to all edits related to the area identified above. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:01, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification, Callanecc. May I check for the correct link for the above -> The Committee's decision is [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Footnoted quotes|here]]? starship.paint ~ regal 03:38, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi Starship.paint, it is on that page, you just need to scroll down to the section titled May 2014. Regards, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:18, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Ah. So it's referring to every BLP. Okay then. starship.paint ~ regal 04:38, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Yeah it does, I was just mentioning that topic area specifically. Regards, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:04, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

OVW and IPs

Hi. I have a problem. User KikeFolan was blocked due vandalism. Later, he returned as DamianFolan and he was blocked. Now, IP 200.42.244.88 makes the same editions. He edits OVW titles and Miss Republica Dominicana. Also, he constantly changes the date when Melvin Maximus won the title. Where do I ask for a block? (He is an IP doging a block)--HHH Pedrigree (talk) 14:31, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

HHH Pedrigree - start a new Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KikeFolan/Archive reporting the IP address. Or, if it's clearly vandalism, there's also Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. starship.paint ~ regal 03:02, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of WrestleMania XXX

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article WrestleMania XXX you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 21:02, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of WrestleMania XXX

The article WrestleMania XXX you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:WrestleMania XXX for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 04:22, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Wrestlemania XXX

Since I am currently competing in the GA Cup, I will not be able to review nominations for articles I previously failed during the cup when renominated. Not sure who's gonna review after you renominate, but I wish you well. Snuggums (talk / edits) 07:24, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Gamergate notice

Please read this notification carefully:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Gamergate controversy.
The details of these sanctions are described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Acroterion (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Watch Out

They might send a crony admin at you! --DSA510 Pls No H8 21:22, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

@DungeonSiegeAddict510: - thanks for your concern. I've had a very clean record on Wikipedia (no edit restrictions whatsoever) and I don't intend to sully that. starship.paint ~ regal 23:03, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Source

Hey Starship, I just wanted to let you know that your recent edits on CM Punk have a ref named "Insidecabana" that wasn't defined.LM2000 (talk) 05:51, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

@LM2000: LOL the real ref was at "InsideCabana" starship.paint ~ regal 07:25, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

LOL, I thought that was a bizarre title. It also explains why ctrl + f found nothing, I probably should've been able to fix that myself but I wasn't sure what you were going for.LM2000 (talk) 07:31, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

@LM2000: - in hindsight that title was terrible, yeah. STOOPID. starship.paint ~ regal 07:35, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Arbcom Evidence

MarkBernstein has been topic banned [1]; You will need to update that Statement. Best regards Avono (talk) 17:49, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

@Avono: - thank you very much for notifying. I have hidden the statement since the current situation seems fine to me. starship.paint ~ regal 01:27, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Your FAC

Hey there! I just saw your nomination over at FAC. I've been waiting for an FAC to come along to review and have the nominator hopefully review an article of mine in exchange. I'd absolutely love to review yours, if you have any interest in reviewing mine (Josh Hutcherson)! I got The Great American Bash (2005) to FA while I was part of the PW project back in 2008 or something, so I do have some history with wrestling articles :) let me know if you have any interest! Gloss 03:43, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

@Gloss: - I'll do my best, but you have to note that I haven't reviewed FAs before, and I am not knowledgeable in film. Thanks for considering me. I might not be very active so I'd need a little time to gather my initial comments. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 06:35, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

It's no rush and if you don't think you want to, don't be afraid to say no! Gloss 06:37, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Patrolled?

Howdy, I'm not exactly sure what "being patrolled" means ><. Care to enlighten me? Ries42 (talk) 06:08, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

• @Ries42: - see Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Your newly created pages are not defamatory nor copyright violations, thus are appropriate for Wikipedia so I marked it as patrolled. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 06:17, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Ah. Cheers :) Ries42 (talk) 06:23, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Your latest bit of evidence

This says it was posted yesterday, at least 24 hours ago from the time I'm writing this (hover your mouse over the "1 day ago"), and the content in the screencap is from before that. And I've repeated this multiple times across the project that Brianna Wu never got in contact with me. I was alerted to that same image as it got spread around Twitter and someone went "@Ryulong" on it. Stop spreading these lies and accusations FFS.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 07:14, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

• @Ryulong:, I have no idea if Brianna Wu contacted you or not, so I don't think I said she did. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 07:22, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

  Well then why bother submitting that speculation as evidence? Why repeat the things said by people actually harassing me?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 07:24, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

@Ryulong: - it's just one of many details which I believe add up to you being detrimental to the project regarding GamerGate / video game related articles. No matter your intentions, I'm afraid your name is sullying the project. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 07:29, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

And kowtowing to the intimidation of MRAs, white supremacists, anti-semites, and homophobes is better? I'm sorry, but your interpretation of what brings the project into disrepute is skewed. A bunch of people angry that I don't share their opinion is setting the bar extremely low.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 07:44, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Being harassed by all these people, it's sucks and it's very unfortunate, but it's not a "get out of jail free" card either. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 08:17, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Source for pre-Steam Depression Quest

New user here so I can't edit anything GamerGate, but I saw you were looking for a source about DQ being available prior to steam. Hope this helps: http://www.pcgamer.com/new-batch-of-steam-greenlight-approvals-contains-depression-quest-tangiers-and-x-plane-10/ Kodra22 (talk) 12:56, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

@Kodra22: - thank you very much! It's not perfect but it will help. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 13:00, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Seasonal Greets!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015 !!!

Hello Starship.paint, May you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New year 2015. Happy editing, Vjmlhds 16:07, 19 December 2014 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Merry Merry

To you and yours

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 14:38, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

• @Bzuk: - thank you and have a good time too! :) starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 02:03, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy New Year Starship.paint!

Happy New Year!

Starship.paint,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Avono (talk) 21:10, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2015}} to user talk pages.