User talk:Starmiffy
This user is a student editor in Department_of_History,_University_of_California,_Los_Angeles/Global_Feminisms,_1850_to_Present_(Fall_2023_term) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Starmiffy, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Brianda and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
---|
|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:34, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Peer Review Complete
[edit]Hi! I completed the peer review of your group's article rough draft. Ok4ytqum (talk) 04:59, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Family name hatnotes
[edit]Hi Starmiffy! I notice you recently reverted my addition of {{family name hatnote}} on the article Zhang Hanying, where you're a primary contributor, and also changed / corrected all instances of "Hanying" in the article to "Zhang".
I guess you were previously unclear on Chinese name order, but I wanted to let you know that the Chinese family name hatnote wasn't a note to you or other contributors on the article that it was using a different style of referring to the subject (forename instead of surname, as is typical in Chinese language sources). It's a standard bit of clarification for readers of the article, recommended in Wikipedia:Manual of Style/China- and Chinese-related articles § Chinese language (you can read about the two recommended practices at Template:Family name explanation/doc § Footnotes vs. hatnotes). Almost all our Chinese biography articles have this template, and I would recommend you put it back in the article in one of the two ways described at the guidance pages just linked.
Thanks and happy editing! Folly Mox (talk) 13:18, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
"1872-1915" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]The redirect 1872-1915 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 24 § 1872-1915 until a consensus is reached. 94rain Talk 01:51, 24 January 2024 (UTC)