User talk:StarFish2022

This is StarFish2022's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Star Investors (November 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Star Investors and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 16:19, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, StarFish2022! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 16:19, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

StarFish2022 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know why my IP address is blocked Please Unblock it StarFish2022 (talk) 10:02, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

To help you, we need to know your IP address. If you do not wish to post it publicly, you may use WP:UTRS to provide it privately. 331dot (talk) 10:58, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please place new posts at the bottom, for proper discussion flow. 331dot (talk) 10:58, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Sangram champion.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sangram champion.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:30, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Star Investors

Hello, StarFish2022. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Star Investors, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:46, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Citing sources

Hi this (Wikipedia:Citing sources) is the generally accepted standard that editors should attempt while citing a source. Regards. Sid95Q (talk) 05:51, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Your recent edit have been revert in Sangram Singh because you didn't add reference properly, please add reference properly from the next time. Someonewhoisusinginternet (talk) 03:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:31, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sangram Singh

Given that your recent editing history seems to consist entirely of adding material (which might well be regarded as poorly sourced and unduly promotional) to the Sangram Singh article, I think it reasonable to ask you whether (a) you are familiar with the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guideline, and (b) whether you have any connection (personal or professional) with Singh? AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:36, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning.

The next time you make an edit like this one, [1] I am going to report the matter at WP:ANI, asking that you be blocked from editing. The sourcing is abysmal, and the tone ridiculously promotional, in clear violation of the Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy. You have already been warned regarding the applicability of contentious topics procedures to this article, and thus are unlikely to get much leniency. The article has a talk page, where you are free to discuss the content, but I'd strongly advise you to familiarise yourself with relevant policy first. In particular, read the following:

Wikipedia:Reliable sources (and see WP:NEWSORGINDIA too)

Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons

Wikipedia:Neutral point of view

I will also expect a clear answer to the question I asked above regarding the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guidelines. AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:08, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Sangram Singh

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sangram Singh, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:35, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:14, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Because you have been repeatedly adding poorly referenced promotional content to Sangram Singh for over a year, despite being warned, you have been indefinitely blocked from editing the article. You can make neutral well-referenced edit requests at Talk:Sangram Singh. Please read the Guide to appealing blocks. Cullen328 (talk) 05:27, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/StarFish2022. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 13:52, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]