User talk:StarAthlete04

SPIRE Institute moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, SPIRE Institute, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bensci54 (talk) 16:45, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SPIRE Institute (April 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All coverage is press releases, WP:ROUTINE or not secondary.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SPIRE Institute and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:SPIRE Institute, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 06:13, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, StarAthlete04! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 06:13, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SPIRE Institute and Academy moved to draftspace

It appears that you may have a conflict of interest with the subject of SPIRE Institute and Academy, and as such you should submit this article to be published through the Articles for Creation process. Before editing the article further, please first disclose on your user page and on the article's Talk page whether you have received money to write this or other articles on Wikipedia, or if you have any other kind of conflict of interest concerning the subject. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. Before submitting, you should make sure that the article is fully compliant with Wikipedia’s neutrality and verifiability policies, as well as our notability guidelines. When you’re ready, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. This process is encouraged, but optional. If you choose not to participate in it, you can remove the AfC template and move the article back to mainspace. You should also consider reaching out to the Teahouse for additional feedback and aid from experienced editors. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:26, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to SPIRE Institute and Academy, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:StarAthlete04, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=StarAthlete04|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:54, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, there is no financial compensation, I just find it rediculous that my first article I created has not been approved even when it is very notable, and very credible. StarAthlete04 (talk) 21:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC) Rosguill[reply]

We've seen paid promotional editing on the article in the past, hence the heightened scrutiny. Please also note that notability on Wikipedia has a specific meaning and is a measurement of the amount of coverage in reliable, independent sources; it is not a synonym for important or significant, and arguments that are predicated on its importance rather than on the existence of coverage are unlikely to sway other editors. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It meets significant coverage from reliable sources, and i am not getting compensated in any fashion. No original research is needed to see that this company has a very rare distinction and has employed/has significant alum such as lamelo ball. As such, this company is similar to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMG_Academy IMG academy has fewer reliable sources and lacks notability. The redirect should be removed. StarAthlete04 (talk) 21:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC) Rosguill[reply]

Given the past disruption involving the article (not by you), you should submit a draft through the articles for creation process. I would also recommend identifying the three best notability-establishing sources on the talk page, as the last version of the article that I saw was suffering from a case of WP:CITEBOMB. As a side note, if you want to attract my attention, writing {{ping|Rosguill}} is more effective than copying my user name. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you move it to a draft with the content before the redirect? I can't figure out how {{ping|Rosguill}} StarAthlete04 (talk) 21:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

StarAthlete04, done, and don't include the nowiki tags when using the ping template. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Celestina007 (talk) 20:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SPIRE Institute and Academy (February 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Blablubbs were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The three sources given on the talk page to establish notability are far from sufficient (in order: press release, not RS, not in-depth coverage). I also have WP:COI concerns; any conflicts of interest should be disclosed before resubmission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SPIRE Institute and Academy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:SPIRE Institute and Academy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Blablubbs|talk 21:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 13:35, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SPIRE Institute and Academy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, SPIRE Institute and Academy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 01:05, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Spire Institute and Academy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spire Institute and Academy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spire Institute and Academy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Salimfadhley (talk) 00:21, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]