User talk:Stapmoshun

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Stapmoshun, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains^(talk) 01:07, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Benny Hill Saluting.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Benny Hill Saluting.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:43, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stapmoshun. You seem to have tagged the above file with {{db-author}} which you can do. FWIW, I believe my tagging of the file as replaceable fair use was appropriate. Since I did so, however, another editor has nominated the Commons photo of Hill for deletion per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Benny Hill.JPG. If the Commons file is deleted, then a non-free of Hill might be possible per item 10 of WP:NFCI as long as there's no reasonable expectation that another free equivalent cannot be created or found. Hill was a quite popular TV personality which means probably lots of photos were taken of him. As I posted at c:COM:VPC#Benny Hill Image, there may be other free images of him somewhere. I look and ask someone else to look as well, but perhaps you can try too. Ebay and similar sites are often a good place to check for old publicity photos which either never were marked with a copyright notice or whose copyright was not renewed. A non-free should be the final option, but it's OK when a free equivalent cannot be expected to be found. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:25, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Marchjuly, the photo I had put up was being disputed because I was told the image that was on display before was a free equivalent that did the job of showing Benny Hill's face well enough. However, the fact that a wax statue instead of an actual photograph is being used to showcase a person's image somehow bothers me. Nonetheless, I don't want to cause any copyright issues, so I deleted my picture and reverted the Benny Hill article back to the way it was before. Before uploading my image, I had searched Google far and wide for a free Benny Hill photo, but couldn't find any. I had emailed BBC asking if I could use a picture they had on an article, which was a brilliant photo really, a black and white photo of him in a kitchen when he was young. However, I haven't gotten a response from them. I put the image up and there was a warning underneath stating it would be taken down in two days, and I figured waiting was just delaying the inevitable. But I'm reading from you that the Commons photo might be taken down so I can put mine back up, is that correct? If so, I'd like to find a better picture; mine was a bit low quality. Thanks for your help. Stapmoshun (talk) 01:55, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It might be best to see what happens with the Commons image first before uploading a new non-free images. While I kind of undersand your point about the wax statue, WP:NFCC#1 encourages us to use free equivalents whenever they can serve the same encyclopedic purpose, and the wax statue photo seems fine for primary identification; especially since the non-free you uploaded was basically the same pose of Hill in character. In some cases there might be better non-free photo which can possibly be used, but Wikipedia goes with the free equivalent if available if it suffices for identification. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:04, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, thank you. Keep me posted on the picture you found here https://www.celebrity8x10s.com/benny-hill-photo-b79675.html I would definitely like to use this one if we can, and if it's free. Stapmoshun (talk) 02:09, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Benny Hill Smiling.jpg

Your license won't work - it's not pre 1923, nor is it suitable for PD-no-renewal, as the date is likely to be in the automatic renewal era, and it will be in copyright (in UK) at URAA, so US copyright gets renewed to 95 years after publication.... Only way is fair use - I've changed the page for you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 18:29, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Stapmoshun (talk) 19:40, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Stapmoshun! You created a thread called Purpose of editing at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Stapmoshun! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Copyright for a Google Maps photo?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Stapmoshun! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Use of the pronoun "we" on Wikipedia, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hako Yamasaki (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hako Yamasaki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hako Yamasaki, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 04:24, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stapmoshun! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SL93 (talk) 04:24, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Stapmoshun! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How can I see who added a particular citation?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:06, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]