User talk:Srinimisha

Welcome

Hello, Srinimisha, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Raj Reddy have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Muhandes (talk) 05:17, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Raj Reddy. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 05:05, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Srinimisha. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Raj Reddy, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 05:48, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As you specifically said here, that you "work under Prof Raj Reddy, for editing his Wikipedia page", there is no question that a conflict of interest exists. Per the guideline above, I ask you to completely avoid editing the article directly. Any change that you want to make, please put on the talk page, and another editor will check it and verify its neutrality before making the change. --Muhandes (talk) 05:52, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, are you in any way related to Priyanka chinnapareddy? --Muhandes (talk) 05:52, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am warning you for the last time. Please STOP EDITING IMMEDIATELY. You clearly have a conflict of interest and should not edit the article. --Muhandes (talk) 06:20, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:DrRajReddy.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:DrRajReddy.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since the copyright of this image obviously belongs to Dr. Reddy, you will need him to personally send his consent to release the image to the public. You might find some more relevant information here and here. --Muhandes (talk) 11:01, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

3rd Warning

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Raj Reddy. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Muhandes (talk) 13:28, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I explained this to you multiple times now.

You are introducing unsourced material
You have a very clear conflict of interes
Let me add that your edit is also against the Manual of Style and other guidelines in so many points I would not even bother to list them all. Just have a look at WP:CREDENTIAL and WP:EL to get you started.

Continue to go against the rules and guidelines of Wikipedia and you might get blocked. --Muhandes (talk) 13:32, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Noticeboard notification

I reported the issue to the Conflict of interest noticeboard. --Muhandes (talk) 13:44, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Raj Reddy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This is your last warning. Stop Edit Warring. Stop introducing material which is unsourced. Stop removing maintenance templates without handling the issue. Stop adding content against MOS and guidelines. Stop editing when you are in such a clear conflict of interest, and you are introducing promotional material. Muhandes (talk) 15:58, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Raj Reddy. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Muhandes (talk) 16:22, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. When the block expires please make sure that you discuss any potentially controversial edits on the article's talk page, rather than repeatedly trying to force your preferred changes through by persistently repeating them. In addition, please refrain from editing in a promotional way, which is contrary to Wikipedia policy, and bear in mind that you should not be making substantial changes to any article for which you have a conflict of interest, as is clearly the case for Raj Reddy . Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:58, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The block has been reset to 48 hours due to attempted evasion of the block by using another account. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:29, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for resuming your relentless edit warring to promote the subject in spite of warnings and a previous block, as you did at Raj Reddy. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 09:57, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]