Jump to content

User talk:Spudleyspuds

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

HI! Wikipedia is not a soapbox!

I thought I should let you know this, if you wonder why i revert your edits on BNP. It has nothing to do with differences in opinion! Greswik 17:13, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Enough vandalism

[edit]

Is racist the only word you know to use in condemning someone with whom you don't agree? You're advised to stop vandalising the BNP page. If you disagree with something, please see the discussion page 128.194.5.139 07:37, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Smear campaign on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Anti Vandal Spy 03:43, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


April 2007

[edit]

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Oxford Clay. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mysdaao 14:12, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

British National Party

[edit]

Please stop vandalising the page. While you may not agree with the subject of the article, defacing it (as you have seen) only results in your changes being reverted and may, in future, lead to your account being banned. -- JediLofty User | Talk 18:25, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

stop last warning about vandalising this article, go somewhere else if you want to rant--Speed Air Man 17:42, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NPA

[edit]

Go read WP:NPA. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 17:49, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point, you will be blocked from editing. Veinor (talk to me) 17:57, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your persistent vandalism

[edit]

you have been reported for your continual disruptive editing. If you have a problem with an article, discuss it in a civilised manner on the talk page, I guarantee you will not get your own way on wikipedia just to prove your point. Plenty of websites out there that will cater for your pointless drama and attention seeking. --Speed Air Man 16:29, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


May 2007

[edit]

All contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Lucy-marie may be offensive or unwelcome. In case you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do, particularly to userpages. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. DebateKid 22:14, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy by persistently vandalising Wikipedia articles, despite warnings. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. J Milburn 22:26, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]