User talk:Springfield 4ever

February 2023

Your recent editing history at Roman Shukhevych shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
See this GizzyCatBella🍁 13:14, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mayve stop removing sourced content, and I will stop bringing it back? -Springfield 4ever (talk) 13:21, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Springfield_4ever reported by User:GizzyCatBella (Result: ). Thank you. GizzyCatBella🍁 13:44, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information. -Springfield 4ever (talk) 13:51, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023 1

You have been blocked temporarily from editing from certain pages (Roman Shukhevych) for persistent edit-warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 14:14, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have made only useful contributions. You are the one that should be considering making useful contributions. -Springfield 4ever (talk) 14:15, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Whether your contributions are useful or not is irrelevant. You are edit-warring on a page that you shouldn't be editing at all. Black Kite (talk) 14:17, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It’s very relevant per ignore all rules. But if you care about the stupid general sanctions so much you can add it yourself. -Springfield 4ever (talk) 14:19, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest that using IAR as the reason to break a general sanction is not a spectacularly good idea. Black Kite (talk) 14:43, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See below - this isn't the only rule they have been ignoring. Girth Summit _(blether) 15:15, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Slava Ukraini Heroyam Slava 123 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Slava Ukraini Heroyam Slava 123. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 15:00, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]