User talk:Sportyguy03

Images

Hi and welcome. It looks like you need help. Check out: WP:IMAGES. Also look at WP:TAGS. ccwaters 18:15, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Oilers.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Oilers.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:52, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Touchdown Atlantic

I noticed you removed the proposed deletion template from the above titled article. It is your right to do that whether or not you intend to make any other changes to the article. As the article is, I think it likely that someone will nominate the article for deletion persuant to WP:AFD. If you would like to make sure this article finds its place in this project permanently, I would suggest that you clearly establish what is notable about it and back that up with verifiable sources you cite in the article. Good luck. Erechtheus 01:21, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Halifax sports teams

Yours was the one I found. If you tell me what other cities' articles have sports logos on them, I'm perfectly willing to correct those as well. _└ ^OzLawyer / _talk ^┐ 19:49, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Montreal ABA HAS been renamed the Montreal Royal

Here's the source: [1]. Tom Danson 11:04, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Darmouth MD.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Darmouth MD.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 00:48, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About Halifax Rainmen

I got that new logo from the owner via e-mail. He says the website is coming soon! Tom Danson 01:55, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Thunder_logohfx.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Thunder_logohfx.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:27, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:ABAAllstar2007.jpg

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:ABAAllstar2007.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:59, 6 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 18:59, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Nova Scotia

Hi! I notice you have made some recent changes to Halifax Regional Municipality, a Nova Scotia related article, and I am inviting you to join Wikiproject Nova Scotia, a collaboration of editors who are interested in improving the quality of Nova Scotia related articles. If you are interested, just add your name to the list! Andrew⁶⁴⁷ 02:14, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dartmouth Destroyers

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Dartmouth Destroyers, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 20:29, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Destroyers-dtmth.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Destroyers-dtmth.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:15, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Citadels.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Citadels.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:TDA.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:TDA.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 03:49, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Oilers.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Oilers.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:29, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Modelhfx.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Modelhfx.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 17:39, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Towers from Citadel.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Towers from Citadel.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:30, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Phi Kappa Pi Sorority.

I'm not interested in edit warring (Move warring?), but I've gone searching for Phi Kappa Pi as a sorority and the primary mentions that I have found is for a Sorority that New York based that a) was shattered by the SUNY decision to not allow Nationals, b) has no article and c) if it *had* an article, appears to be more appropriate to list under its primary name Clionian. I don't think Disambiguation terms are needed until multiple articles exist. I'm just not sure we need to go the Delta Phi Epsilon route. Naraht (talk) 20:28, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Fraternities and Sororities

Also, you may be interested in Wikipedia:WikiProject Fraternities and Sororities.Naraht (talk) 20:38, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to the NBL Canada WikiProject

Please accept this invite to join the WikiProject National Basketball League of Canada, a WikiProject dedicated to improving National Basketball League of Canada related articles. Simply click here to accept!

TempleM (talk) 18:39, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 Halifax Hurricanes season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forward. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NBL Canada tasks

Hello. With the 2015–16 NBL Canada season under a week away, there are some things that members of the NBLC WikiProject need to take a look at. Please consider making the following the edits:

Create 2015–16 season articles for every team.
Edit every team's schedule on these articles with each game.
Update the league season article as Player of the Week honors are awarded. Also, update this article with statistics.

Thank you for all the work you have put into the Hurricanes articles so far. TempleM (talk) 00:16, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 NBL Canada season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Martin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Green Bay Packers

An article in the New Yorker states that the Packers are "the only publicly owned, not-for-profit, major professional team in the United States". ESPN confirms this. Please revert your edit, adding these references to the article. Thank you. 32.218.43.242 (talk) 17:48, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I already corrected the issue. If you want the source changed, you can go change it. Sportyguy03 (talk) 20:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't correct the issue; you created one. I can't change the article because it's protected. I thought we were here to create an encyclopedia... 32.218.43.242 (talk) 03:23, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sportyguy03. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HalifaxHurricanes.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HalifaxHurricanes.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sportyguy03. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sportyguy03. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Halifax Hurricanes

Template:Halifax Hurricanes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 11:33, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Halifax Thunder

The article Halifax Thunder has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication or evidence of notability. Appears to have been a short-lived, low-level junior franchise.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PK T(alk) 01:38, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Thunder logohfx.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thunder logohfx.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2015–16 NBL Canada Atlantic standings

Template:2015–16 NBL Canada Atlantic standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:31, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2015–16 NBL Canada Central standings

Template:2015–16 NBL Canada Central standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:38, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]