User talk:Spiritualism1234
| This is Spiritualism1234's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Arthur Underhill has been accepted
[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Theroadislong (talk) 02:54, 19 October 2022 (UTC)October 2022
[edit]
Hi Spiritualism1234! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Arthur Underhill that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 18:12, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for this welcome clarification. Spiritualism1234 (talk) 22:09, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Pretious Heslop has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Dan arndt (talk) 05:48, 3 November 2022 (UTC)- Thanks Dan arndt, I will look into developing this over time as you suggest. I am curious, another article that I submitted for review weeks ago has not been reviewed. This review in comparison was remarkably swift! I notice that I can also create new articles myself without posting a request - can I change the submission process on this other article? Or if you are interested see: Draft:Joseph Butterworth Owen? Spiritualism1234 (talk) 06:24, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- Unfortunately its just the luck of the draw. I regularly review recent articles for creation - generally a rough triage, declining those drafts which clearly don't met Wikipedia's notability requirements or are copyright infringements. Occasionally I might find a draft that I feel is worthy of moving to the main space, which I will do so. However real life often interferes with my editing on Wikipedia so there's no way that I see every new draft. I'll have a look at Joe Owen if I get the time - in the meantime happy and successful editing. Dan arndt (talk) 06:36, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Butterworth Owen has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Cabrils (talk) 00:40, 4 November 2022 (UTC)ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)