User talk:Spinnerex01

March 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Derek Carr, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Justarandomamerican (talk) Have a good day! 01:51, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Curtis Jordan. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Adakiko (talk) 11:53, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! AdmiralAckbar1977 (talk) 15:53, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Which edit are talking about? if it's the one about Devin McCourty, then that's because he announced yesterday that he was retiring. I was looking at a news article detailing his retirement. Spinnerex01 (talk) 16:23, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Spinnerex01, I was really talking about all of your edits. Please make sure to leave an edit summary so other editors know explicitly what you’re doing when you’re doing it. Thank you - AdmiralAckbar1977 (talk) 16:42, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Spinnerex01 see here AdmiralAckbar1977 (talk) 23:30, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Derek Carr, you may be blocked from editing. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 04:54, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to 2022–23 Boston Bruins season, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. AdmiralAckbar1977 ^talk ^contribs 19:43, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Much of what you're adding has been unnecessary, biased commentary and original research. Reign it in, we're not trying to tell stories. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:45, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Derek Carr. gobonobo ⁺ ^c 19:15, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jasen Isom moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jasen Isom, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 04:32, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Spinnerex01 (talk) 19:17, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism, as you did at Derek_Carr.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:24, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Courcelles (talk) 22:34, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jasen Isom

Hello, Spinnerex01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jasen Isom, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jasen Isom

Hello, Spinnerex01. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jasen Isom".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:44, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]