Jump to content

User talk:Spinerod

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposed deletion of Shoot To Kill (DS Mixtape)

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Shoot To Kill (DS Mixtape), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable mixtape with little or nothing in the way of substantial media coverage. Fails WP:MUSIC#Albums.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.

The Lovely Bones (film)

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Alientraveller (talk) 00:10, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Preview button

[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edit(s) to Mean Girls, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 21:22, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

There is no need to link the same name three times in an infobox. Chris Nolan is one person three bluelinks are of no use. Stop the overlinking. Darrenhusted (talk) 20:58, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re: Chicago Tribune Building

[edit]

Thank you for your comment on the Tribune Tower. Your story is interesting and plausible — however, "what a security guard told me" is original research, and is not a verifiable statement published in a reliable source. If you could review those policies and find such a source, I would gladly leave this item in the article; but as it is, we have no way of knowing that you're not (unwittingly or otherwise) propagating an urban myth. Kevin Forsyth (talk) 11:55, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Tribune Tower, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kevin Forsyth (talk) 17:23, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that by continuing to insert this information without responding to my multiple requests for a reliable source, you are at risk of violating Wikipedia policy regarding edit warring. As I cannot revert your edit at this time without violating WP:3RR myself, it will stand for now, but in the meantime I will move this discussion to the Tribune Tower talk page for consensus-building. Please respond there. Kevin Forsyth (talk) 17:50, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


LOL

[edit]

That is funny man. I checked your page for a while to see if you fixed it, and I guess it snuck past you. I saw your page after an edit we made on the same article and I couldn't resist the temptation. On a more serious note though, the Phillies are who scares me the most about playing my Cards in the playoffs. No hard feelings though. Just goofin. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Backvoods (talk • contribs) 21:57, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jerry Seinfeld influenced Rosie O'Donnell

[edit]

I am curious about this edit. I assume it is based on reliable sources. Could you point kindly point me to those sources so that I may read them for myself? Dlabtot (talk) 03:40, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Philadelphia Union

[edit]

Is there a reason that you are edit-warring over the location of an image? I've provided a rationale as to why I moved the image and you moved it back without discussing on the talk or providing an edit summary. The image's location looks horrible because the text looks discontinuous if you put an left-aligned image right under the level-2 header with very little text under it. MOS:IMAGE might help here. — KV5 • Talk • 20:18, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, just because you added the images doesn't give you never-ending rights to say where they go. We are all here to build an encyclopedia, and I made improvements to the locations of the images with an edit summary explaining why. You didn't seem to have any response other than undoing my revisions. Please assume good faith when others are trying to make improvements rather than simply reverting. Thanks. — KV5 • Talk • 23:34, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You still have not provided a rationale for moving those pictures besides "it looks better". I've directed you to sitewide guidelines that explain my moves. I'm not going to move them again because you obviously don't care about my rationale, but you should know that your edits can be construed as tendentious, since you refuse to discuss and instead just continue to revert without rationale. Simply because "adding pictures takes time": that does not, under any circumstances, give you absolute authority over where the images should be placed. Besides assuming good faith (linked above), you should read WP:OWN; you do not own your image contributions, especially if you've released them into the public domain. I suggest you reconsider this pattern.
The alterations that I did make this morning should not be reverted. Per MOS:CAP, you absolutely cannot have a period/full stop at the end of an incomplete sentence. Obviously you didn't bother to see that I had made those corrections in line with the Manual of Style before blindly reverting. — KV5 • Talk • 11:35, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The changes you made to the pictures, which you reverted back in contravention of guidelines, don't have any defensible rationale. There is no guideline that says pictures cannot be extended into the reference section, as you claimed. However, there is a guideline that says: "Avoid sandwiching text between two images that face each other" (MOS:IMAGES). There is absolutely no claim on which you can base "images shouldn't extend into the reference section". You need to discuss going forward on the article talk page. This means do not use edit summaries to discuss. If you have something to say, use the talk page before making any changes. Wait for discussion to occur and then make changes once a policy-based consensus is reached. Please see also WP:BRD. If you continue to refuse to use talk pages for discussion, you may be blocked. — KV5 • Talk • 01:01, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding your proposed compromise, see the article talk page. I'm not reverting you further, but I expect that you would participate in discussion. If you refuse to discuss and just continue to make edits against policy, you might get blocked for it. Fair warning. — KV5 • Talk • 11:37, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I started a discussion on the article's talk page. Please comment there so the discussion is not fragmented. — KV5 • Talk • 15:40, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Talk:PPL Park. All articles have a talk page accessible by clicking the "discussion" tag at the top of the page. You should use this page for discussion when making controversial changes to an article, especially when they have previously been reverted. — KV5 • Talk • 15:46, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:PPL_Park3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:38, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:PPL_Park3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:10, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mls-philadelphia-logo.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mls-philadelphia-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:47, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Great Work

[edit]
Football (soccer) barnstar
For you diligent efforts on articles related to the Philadelphia Union and Major League Soccer I award you this barnstar. Keep up the good work! SkotyWATC 03:51, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:2010NYCosmos.png

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2010NYCosmos.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --MGA73 (talk) 07:51, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Brad-Knighton1.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Brad-Knighton1.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:06, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010 Philadelphia Phillies season

[edit]

Hi. If you're going to update the game log on 2010 Philadelphia Phillies season and the like, please update the "record vs. opponents" table as well so that the article is in sync. If it's not, it makes the article incorrect. Thanks. — KV5 • Talk • 13:22, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{Philadelphia Union}}

[edit]

This is a template. Somehow the information for 2011 Philadelphia Union season has been put in it and all the documentation for the template has been deleted. As you seem to be the last editor of this page, would you take care of this and have the maker of the template fix it so that it does not generate DEFAULTSORT conflicts? Thank you. JimCubb (talk) 01:55, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

[edit]

Hey, just FYI; I don't want to get into an edit war about something as stupid as photo placement, but so you know: I didn't right-justify it because it looks better than on the left (or vice-versa) - it has nothing to do with aesthetics, and it's not an WP:ILIKEIT issue. Having the photo justified to the left actually causes paragraph alignment and row alignment errors on my screen, which means that it likely causes paragraph alignment and row alignment errors for other readers too. Maybe you don't see them with whatever screen resolution you have, but I assure you they ARE there, and the photo needs to be on the right in order to cure this. --JonBroxton (talk) 05:54, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Sheanon Williams.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.philadelphiaunion.com/content/union-1-fire-0. As a copyright violation, File:Sheanon Williams.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Sheanon Williams.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. ccwaters (talk) 20:17, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Union

[edit]

Are you affiliated with the Union in anyway? ccwaters (talk) 20:25, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Keon Daniel Union.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://sports.yahoo.com/mls/games/2011061129/gallery/im:urn:newsml:sports.yahoo,getty:20050301:mls,photo,dfa70894ac9027c5d2a097642a770f1c-getty-109261557hm014_salt_lake_union:1. As a copyright violation, File:Keon Daniel Union.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Keon Daniel Union.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. TerminalPreppie (talk) 18:16, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Faryd Mondragón Union.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Faryd Mondragón Union.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 21:36, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your images are up for deletion in Commons

[edit]

Hi, the images you uploaded here and were moved by other users to Commons are now listed for deletion. Your input would be greatly appreciated at commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Uploads by User:Spinerod. Thanks. --Mosmof (talk) 11:32, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Alejandro Bedoya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
was linked to United States national soccer team
Herculez Gomez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
was linked to United States national soccer team
Maurice Edu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
was linked to United States national soccer team
Michael Orozco Fiscal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
was linked to United States national soccer team
Sacha Kljestan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
was linked to United States national soccer team

Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:19, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MOSFLAG

[edit]

Please remove the flags you added to MLS franchise articles without having read WP:MOSFLAG --Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:04, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

never mind I did it myself. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:08, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop adding the flags. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:10, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jimmy McLaughlin (soccer)

[edit]

The article Jimmy McLaughlin (soccer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has not satisfied the requirements of WP:NFOOTBALL. Specifically, "A player who signs for a domestic team but has not played in any games is not deemed to have participated in a competition, and is therefore not generally regarded as being notable". Recreate article when he has played a match for the union.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 07:46, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jimmy McLaughlin (soccer) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jimmy McLaughlin (soccer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy McLaughlin (soccer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bgwhite (talk) 20:42, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited 2012 Philadelphia Union season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chicago Fire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chandler Hoffman

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chandler Hoffman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:34, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Levi Houapeu

[edit]

The article Levi Houapeu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:41, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ray Gaddis

[edit]

The article Ray Gaddis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:41, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Greg Jordan

[edit]

The article Greg Jordan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:41, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PROD protocols

[edit]

When contesting the proposed deletion of an article, as you did with Ray Gaddis and Greg Jordan, please explain your reason for doing so in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:10, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kasey Keller

[edit]

Hi. I noticed you changed Kasey Keller's international cap total from 101 to 102 without any revision summary notes. I'm not sure where you got the 102 cap total from.

FIFA.com explicitly lists him as having 101 caps as to 2 December 2011 and I'm 10000000% sure he didn't make any international appearances after that date.

I am reverting the total back to 101 as per the official international cap list from FIFA. See here: http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/fifafacts/stats-centclub/52/00/59/fifacenturyclubmen.pdf

Acmilan10italia (talk) 12:52, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2012 Philadelphia Union Reserves season

[edit]

The article 2012 Philadelphia Union Reserves season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, as this reserve team season has not received significant coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 08:47, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: 2012 Philadelphia Union Reserves season

[edit]

Seasons of reserve and amateur teams are not considered notable enough to merit standalone articles.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with 2011 Philadelphia Union Reserves season. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:17, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Greg Jordan

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Greg Jordan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:05, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ray Gaddis

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ray Gaddis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:05, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Ray Gaddis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited 2012 Philadelphia Union season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dan Kennedy and Carlos Valdés (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Bakary Soumaré, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2. Bundesliga (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012 Philadelphia Union season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danny O'Rourke (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Conor Casey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oberliga Südwest (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Voice (Seinfeld), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Butt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 21:32, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 Philadelphia Union season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Magee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Spinerod. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Spinerod. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Spinerod. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Spinerod&oldid=869724478"