User talk:Spidy30

Spidy30, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Spidy30! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

Hello, I'm Sjö. Your recent edit(s) appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sjö (talk) 20:12, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ferrara Candy Company, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sjö (talk) 08:11, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Malaco. Sjö (talk) 04:58, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding false information. A company doesn't become e.g. Italian just because it's owned by an Italian company. Jaguar and Land Rover are very much British cars even if the owner is Tata Motors from India. Sjö (talk) 17:22, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ballerup Municipality, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prag (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:36, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Iceland, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —DIYeditor (talk) 15:37, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Will be forced to request administrator intervention

Please pay attention to Wikipedia rules and why you are being reverted or I (and others) may be forced to seek administrator intervention. Also please use edit summaries. Please reply on your talk page to address these concerns. —DIYeditor (talk) 15:49, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Some tips

I'd like to give you some tips on how to be a more productive editor. First, please find reliable sources and add them to the article. It's not enough that you know something to be true, and note that Wikipedia can't be used as a source to itself. Finding good sources has the added benefit that you can find more information in the source that you can use to further improve the article.

Second, check what information is already in the article. If the information you want to add is already in the article, don't add it again. This means that, for example, if Denmark is included in a list of countries, then you shouldn't add Denmark a second time. And if you want to point out the nationality of some company it's enough to mention it once, maybe twice, but you don't have to add it every time the company is mentioned.

Third, before you save your edit you can use Show preview to check your edits for style, grammar and functioning links to other articles. Happy editing.Sjö (talk) 08:12, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Chocolate, you may be blocked from editing. Please don't practice using English on the encyclopedia. Work in your sandbox first or find somewhere else to enter useless information. Zefr (talk) 17:27, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Chocolate. Zefr (talk) 23:17, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:29, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

North Jutland Railways moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, North Jutland Railways, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:21, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article about Nordjyske Jernbaner already exists: Nordjyske Jernbaner. As far as I can see no reliable source uses North Jutland Railways. Sjö (talk) 10:48, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

As you are not an administrator I strongly suggest that you remove the infoboxes stating that you are an administrator on several language versions. Claiming to be an administrator is disruptive, in my opinion. Sjö (talk) 06:50, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Eat-More, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Re-warning for introduction of unsourced information and falsities contradicted by sources in the articles. Sjö (talk) 06:47, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ferrero SpA, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Europa and Kinder (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:32, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Hello, I'm Rhinopias. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Chocolate, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rhinopias (talk) 02:59, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Sjö (talk) 07:27, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:19, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your disruptive editing has been so pervasive I am in doubt as to whether or not you are WP:HERE to build an encyclopedia. If this continues after the current block expires you are likely to be blocked indefinitely. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:21, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:North Jutland Railways concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:North Jutland Railways, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Spidy30, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Sjö (talk) 09:12, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Spidy30. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:00, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:North Jutland Railways

Hello, Spidy30. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "North Jutland Railways".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! ~riley (talk) 08:25, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Spidy30, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Sjö (talk) 20:51, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]