User talk:SpeedRunnerOfPersia

Welcome!

Hello, SpeedRunnerOfPersia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 00:10, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SpeedRunnerOfPersia (talk) 16:14, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anarcho-communism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agrarian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Anarcho-capitalism. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 20:51, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert for articles and content relating to post-1932 American politics and articles

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 16:56, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Nazi Germany, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) 22:55, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. You've been warned repeatedly for your disruptive editing. I just undid some more disruptive edits.

Also, stop marking all your edits as minor. They are not minor edits. EvergreenFir (talk) 23:00, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. EvergreenFir (talk) 22:28, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for refusal to discuss your edits, and repeatedly editing against consensus.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Floquenbeam (talk) 23:54, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You simply cannot delete warnings, ignore them, and then do the same contested edits. Any admin can lift this block without consulting me, as long as you agree to gain consensus before making further changes. --Floquenbeam (talk) 23:55, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(unblock|Been blocked for too long. Far too long. Need to regain access to this account, for the sake of contributing positively to Wikipedia. Mistakes were made, admittedly. No damage remains, however)