User talk:Spaceteez

This is Spaceteez's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Damo K (October 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CoconutOctopus were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Damo K and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CoconutOctopus talk 22:01, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Spaceteez! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CoconutOctopus talk 22:01, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Spaceteez This was declined as the singer does not meet WP:NSINGER notability requirements. Qcne (talk) 21:29, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne this day live and Vanguardngr is a notable newspaper in Nigeria Spaceteez (talk) 21:32, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Spaceteez We usually require at least three sources that are independent of each other, are independent of the subject, and provide significant coverage. Qcne (talk) 21:37, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne okay, lemme continue to work on the article then send it for review again if I've added 1 more references to the one's that are there right? Spaceteez (talk) 22:01, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I only see a single reference on the draft at the moment. We need at least three. Qcne (talk) 22:10, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne I've added more references and citations. the discography reference is a reliable source that has been reviewed by premium times, a big newspaper news site in Nigeria Spaceteez (talk) 08:16, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne I've resubmitted my draft again for proper review Spaceteez (talk) 08:16, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Damo K (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:MUSICBIO - thehistory.co.za is not a reliable or acceptable source. The Vanguard and This Day references are both primary sources and therefore not independent or reliable either.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Damo K and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:25, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Hi - I'm Girth Summit, an administrator here. I've come here to warn you that comments like this are not acceptable. I recognised that you were not profane or particularly egregious, but it is still a personal attack, which is prohibited here. The person you were speaking to is a massively experienced and knowledgeable editor who was voluntarily spending their time to help you improve your draft; you might not like the advice you were given, and you might not like our guidelines or the way that our editorial review process works, but that does not give you licence to insult the person who is giving up their time to help you. Please don't do anything like that again. Thank you Girth Summit _(blether) 13:11, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]