Jump to content

User talk:Soris80

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

unblock me please

[edit]
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Soris80 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
Soris80 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Theodorosyiorkas". The reason given for Theodorosyiorkas's block is: "Undisclosed paid editing in violation of the WMF Terms of Use".


Decline reason: Obviously the same person: el:Χρήστης:Soris80/πρόχειρο. Now blocked directly. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:11, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Soris80 (talk) 02:18, 18 September 2022 (UTC) [reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Soris80 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm not a sockpuppet of that account.Soris80 (talk) 15:54, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A simple denial is not considered sufficient to overturn a block. PhilKnight (talk) 16:16, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Soris80 (talk) 15:54, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Soris80 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi admin, this block happens because i log in from an IP address that is blocked for Undisclosed paid editing in violation of the WMF Terms of Use of the user Theodorosyiorkas. I really believe and be focus of the Terms of Use of wikipedia and i didnt and dont want to break any rule. Im not a sockpuppet of that user and if you reverse the block of my account you will see that. I think that you should give me a chance because at first i get autoblock about logging in to my account in the same IP address of the other user and then you call me like a sockpuppet of him/her and the only thing i did, was to create a draft page in my sandbox and because my subject was the same with the other user you blocked me. I repeat that i dont want to break eny rule of Wikipedia and if you give me the chance i will be under any rule. Thank you for your time and i believe that you will give me that opportunity because we are humans after all. Wrong situations are in our life and we have to forgive each other. Soris80 (talk) 05:10, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's quite obvious you are the same person so you don't need to insult our intelligence- but if you are a different person, you will need to explain why you are editing about the same person on the same IP as a blocked user. 331dot (talk) 05:28, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request for unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Soris80 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I edit that person because i want to help the article to be more accurate. If i can help with this. What is the real problem? i dont know anything about IP so i dont understand how i use the same IP address with the other account. I think you are too aggressive on me without any reason. I told you only the truth. Soris80 (talk) 05:35, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Alright, that's it. You've now slipped below the minimum level of competence we expect, and it's clear that further discussions here will be unproductive. So, that we won't be wasting our time, nor you yours, talk page access will be revoked. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:19, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Soris80 (talk) 05:35, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Daniel Case (talk) 06:21, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]