User talk:Theodorosyiorkas

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Theodorosyiorkas, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains^(talk) 14:22, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Theodorosyiorkas, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Theodorosyiorkas! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Loukas Giorkas category deletion

Please stop deleting the categories, etc from the Loukas Giorkas article. --Bamyers99 (talk) 19:58, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Loukas Yorkas, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Epistulae ad Familiares (talk) 06:12, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Loukas Yorkas, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop deleting categories and sources on the page. This is indirect contravention with Wikipedia's policies on WP:VERIFIABILITY requiring all content to be properly attributed by reliable sources. The deletion of categories also hampers proper categorisation of the article. Epistulae ad Familiares (talk) 06:17, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Epistulae ad Familiares. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Loukas Yorkas have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Please note that social media links are not appropriate external links per WP:LINKSTOAVOID, and certainly not a substitute for proper references. Epistulae ad Familiares (talk) 06:18, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Loukas Yorkas. Jeb³ _{Talk at me here} 12:12, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Theodorosyiorkas, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Loukas Giorkas, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Epistulae ad Familiares (talk) 12:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Hello Theodorosyiorkas. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Loukas Yorkas, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Theodorosyiorkas. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Theodorosyiorkas|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Hello! Even if you are not being paid, you are clearly very close to the subject, so you need to make necessary disclosures before you continue to edit, and you need to use the article's talk page to request edits, instead of making them directly. Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 13:03, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: theoyiork (September 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Theodorosyiorkas/sandbox/theoyiork and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Theodorosyiorkas/sandbox/theoyiork, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 13:17, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Wikipedia:Teahouse, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:12, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Other wikis

Since you have been editing actively on other versions of Wikipedia, you should review of their conflict of interest policies:

French - fr:Wikipédia:Conflit d'intérêts
German - de:Wikipedia:Interessenkonflikt
Greek - el:Βικιπαίδεια:Σύγκρουση κινήτρων
Spanish - es:Wikipedia:Conflicto de interés

--Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:48, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Theodorosyiorkas! You created a thread called I need help at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Theodorosyiorkas/sandbox/theoyiork

Hello, Theodorosyiorkas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox/theoyiork".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 04:39, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Discussioni utente:Nungalpiriggal

Hello Theodorosyiorkas,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Discussioni utente:Nungalpiriggal for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 23:01, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Hughesdarren okay thank you Dzek (talk) 00:15, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Theodorosyiorkas, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:43, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Loukas Yorkas, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Theodorosyiorkas, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Theodorosyiorkas|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 09:02, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Im not promoting any topic in wikipedia and i dont get paid for this. I just try to reorganize the page of Loukas Yorkas with news and verified information about him and nothing more. How can i show you that im trying to help? Dzek (talk) 09:05, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have a connection with Mr. Yorkas, and other evidence which I am not allowed to disclose publicly suggests to me you are a paid editor. How did you come to edit about him? If you have any sort of paid relationship with Mr. Yorkas(and "paid relationship" is not limited to specific payment for edits) the Terms of Use require that to be disclosed. 331dot (talk) 09:11, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Im start to get angry with this. I dont have any paid relationship with mr. Yiorkas and i dont try to promote anything about him! Im trying to fill his page with reliable content. Prove me wrong. Show me something which i did and it shows that i am promoting Loukas Yorkas!! I will wait an answer. Dzek (talk) 09:15, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Promotion" has a much broader meaning on Wikipedia than you seem to use yourself. You don't have to be actively selling someting or soliciting customers or talking someone up to be promoting them here, or to have an interest in promoting them. You have edited primarily about Mr. Yorkas in the course of your editing career and as I noted previously you seem to have a connection with him(in order to know what he wants). I am not trying to make you angry, but the questions I have posed need to be answered. As I said, the Terms of Use require that any paid relationship with a topic needs to be disclosed, and while not in the Terms of Use, conflict of interest should be disclosed. These things do not mean that you cannot contribute, only that certain procedures need to be followed. 331dot (talk) 09:21, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want an answer about how i come and start editing, I was surfing in wikipedia in other pages and then i see Loukas Yorkas page and i said to change some things which need to change. some minors things, some typo etc. Also i added 2 references about his work which there are many links and especially in iMdB etc. Im trying to help and also if i can i will help others pages too. Dzek (talk) 09:26, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are you in communication with him? You made an edit to remove something from the article and said it was what he wanted. 331dot (talk) 09:28, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot i said that because everything i changed was rejected. Everything i do its on my own and im trying to find references for everything. Dzek (talk) 09:31, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

331dot (talk) 09:46, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot i created my request but it seems that im not blocked. Can u check that and tell me? Dzek (talk) 10:17, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are indeed blocked. 331dot (talk) 12:52, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot okay Theodorosyiorkas (talk) 16:05, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Theodorosyiorkas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

To start with, I want to confirm that I understand the terms of use and the notification requirements of the paid edits

I have not, do not and will not receive any remuneration from anyone for any edits I have done, am doing or will do in the future because I do not do it as a profession or generally do not do it for payment. I have no relationship or communication with Loukas Yorkas. Clear. Just due to the fact that I was and still am new to Wikipedia I don't know how the whole system works and I am slowly learning. I just happened to be involved with this particular page and can help as much as I can with information and references.

In the future if I am allowed to edit on Wikipedia again I will speak up and ask in the talk tab of each page for any changes I suggest to be made.

I hope I have made myself understood.

Thank you very much! Dzek (talk) 10:13, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In this edit, you say that you are the subject's brother. That gives you a conflict of interest. Please read through that guideline and tell us what you would do differently if we unblocked you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:58, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not autoblocked, you are blocked directly, so I have removed the second request(furthermore only one open request is needed). 331dot (talk) 12:49, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Dzek (talk) 18:21, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I missed that comment, which means that you were dishonest with me when I asked you if you were in communication with him. 331dot (talk) 19:23, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@331dot Which comment? I told you anytime that i speak with him and i make changes in communication with him?? Theodorosyiorkas (talk) 16:08, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am referring to where you said he was your brother. 331dot (talk) 05:29, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate who is him/her? Theodorosyiorkas (talk) 16:09, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock 2

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Theodorosyiorkas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have already said that Loukas Yorkas and I dont have any relationship. In this edit i was angry because whatever i change in the article someone reverts my changes. I didnt read the terms of use and how to contribute and i didnt give references on my changes. Thats all! Theodorosyiorkas (talk) 19:44, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per below, especially after declining and revoking talk page access on the Soris80 sock. Will do same here. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:23, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So you were lying then, but not now? You're not helping yourself here. 331dot (talk) 19:48, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To any reviewing admin, I'm willing to email you what I know upon request. 331dot (talk) 19:49, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
My friend its so simple! Because i was new in Wikipedia and i didnt know how it goes here I start make changes without any references so i tell you that im his brother to leave me and accept my changes. It was a big fault from me and i said in my previous unblock request that i will not do it again! Theodorosyiorkas (talk) 20:02, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So again, you were lying then, but not now? 331dot (talk) 05:29, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@331dot What exactly are you trying to do? Theodorosyiorkas (talk) 05:37, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not "trying to do" anything other than ask a question. Either you were lying then, or you are lying now, which is it? If you don't wish to answer, that is your choice, but it doesn't help you with this unblock request(which someone else will review). If you want to start to rebuild trust, only full honesty will do that. 331dot (talk) 05:46, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@331dot I was full honest with this situation. I will tell another time the whole story and i will try to be simple. When I created my wikipedia user account i didnt read any terms of use etc and i start editing Loukas Yorkas article's page. The most changes i made werent with references so some editors revert my changes. I got angry and I tell them that I am his brother so to believe that i said the truth but as someone says wikipedia is not about truth instead is about prove your changes with references. So now i understand how wikipedia works and i will try again to help with Loukas Yorkas article but this time with any rule involved. I mean that i will ask before do anything and I will give references about anything. I think this is clear! I dont have anything more to say. Just this. Thank you! Theodorosyiorkas (talk) 06:01, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So you lied when you said he was your brother. Got it. Once you lie, it becomes more difficult to believe what you say. I have nothing more to say either. Good day; someone will review your request. 331dot (talk) 06:04, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@331dot Oh my friend... You act like you are a robot. This happen before 3 years. I'm a human and I react very wrong and it was my fault and so what now? I have to suicide about this? I was wrong and I promise that i will not do it again. Its simple and we go on. If you want to treat human as a human you know what you have to do. Have a good day!! Theodorosyiorkas (talk) 06:13, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Happy to forgive once we have full honesty and accountability. Haven't seen that yet. But it's not up to me any longer. I'm out now- good day. 331dot (talk) 06:20, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Daniel Case (talk) 06:25, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #68639

is declined. Confirmed block evasion, so the soonest they'd be eligible for unblock consideration would be 2023-07-25. At that point, they need to account for the problems that lead to the block as well as their demonstrated continued dishonesty. -- Yamla (talk) 00:49, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, please don't email me. You are free to make a new UTRS request, though it's all but certainly going to be declined if you make it prior to 2023-07-25. --Yamla (talk) 10:06, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]