User talk:Sorbonneparis

Welcome!

Hello, Sorbonneparis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Doug Weller talk 07:11, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Doug Weller talk 07:25, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My response to WARNING

The warning was NOT JUSTIFIED (see my discussion at your TALK)and I would appreciate if you would remove it. Thanks very much indeed.Sorbonneparis (talk) 15:00, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've suggested moving the discussion on my talk page to WP:BLPN to get a wider input. Doug Weller talk 16:15, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AGAIN (this is now my WARNING to DOUG WELLER: Would you PLEASE remove this unjustified WARNING.Sorbonneparis (talk) 15:44, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I can't do that as I'm not convinced I was wrong. And you wording definitely violated WP:NPOV. You can delete it yourself of course, we allow that and take it as meaning you've read it. Doug Weller talk 16:41, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

UK lecturers are the equivalent of professors elsewhere

Senior lecturers are the equivalent of full professors with other grades being the equivalent of junior professors. To suggest on Wikipedia that this was misrepresentation is a violation of WP:BLP. Note that discussion on Research.gate fails WP:RS. Doug Weller talk 07:36, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation

Sorry, you misunderstood the correction and were probably not informed about the regulations. Equivalent means just "equivalent" but it does not mean to have a power to be used in a foreign country without original qualification. Would you please examine my comment below, consider putting back my changes and remove your warning addressed to me. One of the "Professors" was senior lecturer in UK. Radeljic was Senior lecturer in UK. The other were not, but they also claimed to be "Professors". Yet even if some title may be equivalent, this does not mean it could be used publically in other country and the law forbids to use the titles that are not recognised by some official body (University or similar) of the country where they are used. For example, in Germany:

Using foreign university degrees, titles, or positions in Berlin is regulated in Sec. 34a of the Berlin Higher Education Act (Berliner Hochschulgesetz, BerlHG). It is prohibited to use a degree, title, or position in a way that deviates from the provisions in Sec. 34a BerlHG and can even have criminal consequences (Sec. 132a German Criminal Code, StGB). University degrees and titles that were purchased may not be used. According to Sec. 34a(1) BerlHG, a foreign university degree, title, or position may be used regularly • only in the original form, that is, precisely the form in which it was awarded, • with the inclusion of the university that awarded the degree (known as the “origin information”). Reference: Senatskanzlei Berlin, Berliner Rathaus, Jüdenstr. 1, 10178 Berlin: https://www.berlin.de/sen/wissenschaft/en/university-studies/artikel.711552.en.php

In EU the rules are similar: "If your profession is regulated in the EU country where you want to practice, you may need to apply to get your professional qualification recognized there." (reference: https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/work/professional-qualifications/regulated-professions/index_en.htm)Sorbonneparis (talk) 17:02, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 19:21, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I should have told you about these particular "rules" that we have for BLPs. We take biographies of living people extremely seriously. I've replied on my talk page and will get back to you tomorrow. Doug Weller talk 19:23, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved this to

WP:BLPN Doug Weller talk 20:20, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Sorbonneparis", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username, by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:21, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is no "name" that denotes just one single exclusive concept or thing. Connotations also always overlap. The rules that you mention must, to be effective, be very well defined. Apparently they are not clear enough. Your name contains a fragment "genije" that is in wide use for number of other things and implies something that is not possessed only by you. I would greatly appreciate if you would SPECIFICALLY state how, in what exact respect, by matching the explicit rule and the fragments of my username, violate the mentioned rules. Thank you very much indeed.Sorbonneparis (talk) 09:54, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]